• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂疗效的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

作者信息

Xu Hongge, Ding Hongyan, Shi Can, Ge Qianqian

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223300, China.

Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223300, China.

出版信息

J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023 Dec;52(10):102634. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102634. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102634
PMID:37500012
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using a meta-analysis method.

METHODS

All articles about LUSLS published in English from Jan. 2010 to Jan. 2020 were retrieved using a computer from search engines, including PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese Medical Journals. Meta-analysis was performed by two evaluators using RevMan 5.3 software according to the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of five studies were finally included, with 361 LUSLS cases and 361 control cases. LUSLS group showed a shorter operation duration (SMD-1.96; 95% CI = -3.90- -0.03; P = 0.05), more POP-quantification system (Q) (I) (SMD1.64; 95% CI = 1.05-2.56; P = 0.03), than the control group, with significant differences. There was no difference in the complication incidence, hospital stay, POP-Q>=II between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LUSLS was a safe and effective treatment for POP. Patients had higher postoperative satisfaction, shorter operation duration and satisfactory outcome. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are required in the future to make the results of the meta-analysis more accurate.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在采用荟萃分析方法评估腹腔镜子宫骶韧带悬吊术(LUSLS)治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的疗效。

方法

通过计算机检索2010年1月至2020年1月期间以英文发表的所有关于LUSLS的文章,检索引擎包括PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、万方、维普和中国生物医学文献数据库。由两名评估者根据纳入标准使用RevMan 5.3软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

最终共纳入5项研究,LUSLS组361例,对照组361例。LUSLS组手术时间短于对照组(标准化均数差[SMD]为-1.96;95%可信区间[CI]=-3.90至-0.03;P=0.05),盆腔器官脱垂定量系统(POP-Q)分期改善更明显(SMD为1.64;95%CI=1.05至2.56;P=0.03),差异有统计学意义。两组并发症发生率、住院时间、POP-Q≥Ⅱ期情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

LUSLS是一种治疗POP安全有效的方法。患者术后满意度较高,手术时间短,效果满意。未来需要更多高质量的随机对照试验,以使荟萃分析结果更准确。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.腹腔镜子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂疗效的Meta分析
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023 Dec;52(10):102634. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102634. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2023 Dec;130(13):1568-1578. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17565. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
3
Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带固定术与经阴道全子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗前位和前顶脱垂:手术结果和患者满意度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
Anatomical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction After Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy for Anterior and Apical Prolapse.腹腔镜子宫骶韧带阴道骶骨固定术治疗前位和顶端脱垂后的解剖学结果及患者满意度
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep/Oct;24(5):352-355. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000446.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature.腹腔镜技术治疗顶端器官脱垂修复的比较-文献系统综述。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Nov;38(8):2031-2050. doi: 10.1002/nau.24115. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
6
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术:全面、系统的文献综述。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Oct;277:57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction.腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术与 Uphold Lite™ 网片阴道穹隆悬吊术治疗压力性尿失禁的临床疗效和患者满意度比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1513-1518. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04563-3. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
8
[Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].经阴道高位骶子宫韧带悬吊术的长期疗效
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;52(6):363-368. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.06.002.
9
[A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].[对有或无自体组织修复的经阴道高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗中盆腔缺陷效果的五年分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 25;54(7):445-451. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.07.003.
10
Transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension: An alternative to McCall culdoplasty in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.经阴道高位子宫骶韧带悬吊术:治疗盆腔器官脱垂中麦克考尔氏子宫骶韧带悬吊术的替代方法。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:278-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 21.