Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 27;13(7):e066298. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066298.
Strong primary care leaders are needed to assure high quality services for patient populations. This study analysed general practitioners' (GP) leadership skills comparing practice-level self and staff assessments based on the full range of leadership model and the leader-member exchange (LMX).
The questionnaire survey was conducted among German general practice leaders and their staff participating in the IMPROVE trial.
The study population comprised 60 German general practices with 366 participants: 84 GP practice leaders and 282 employees (28 physicians and 254 practice assistants).
Leadership skills of the practice leaders were measured using the Integrative Leadership Questionnaire (German Fragebogen für integrative Führung) and the LMX-7 questionnaire. Leaders rated themselves and practice staff rated their leaders. The data was analysed by paired mean comparisons on the practice level.
For most leadership dimensions, practice leaders rated themselves higher than their employees rated them. Differences were found for transformational leadership (p<0.001, d=0.41), especially for the dimensions 'innovation' (p<0.001, d=0.69) and 'individuality focus' (p<0.001, d=0.50). For transactional leadership, the dimension 'goal setting' differed significantly (p<0.01, d=0.30) but not the other dimensions. Scores for negative leadership were low and showed no differences between leaders and employees. Interestingly, employed physicians' rated their practice leaders higher on the two transformational ('performance development', 'providing a vision') and all transactional dimensions. The LMX-7 scale showed high quality relationships between leaders and employees.
This 180° analysis of GPs' leadership skills with self and employee ratings indicated good relationships. There is a potential to improve leadership regarding goal-setting, innovation and focusing on individual team members. These results allow for the development of targeted interventions.
German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012677. Registered 16 October 2019.
需要强有力的初级保健领导者来确保为患者群体提供高质量的服务。本研究通过全范围领导力模型和领导-成员交换(LMX)分析了全科医生的领导技能,并比较了基于自我和员工评估的实践水平。
问卷调查在参与 IMPROVE 试验的德国全科医学领导者及其员工中进行。
研究人群包括 60 家德国全科诊所,共有 366 名参与者:84 名全科医生实践领导者和 282 名员工(28 名医生和 254 名实习助理)。
使用综合领导力问卷(德国Fragebogen für integrative Führung)和 LMX-7 问卷测量实践领导者的领导技能。领导者对自己进行评分,而实践员工对其领导者进行评分。数据在实践层面上通过配对均值比较进行分析。
对于大多数领导维度,实践领导者对自己的评价高于员工对他们的评价。在变革型领导方面存在差异(p<0.001,d=0.41),特别是在“创新”(p<0.001,d=0.69)和“关注个体”(p<0.001,d=0.50)维度上。在交易型领导方面,“目标设定”维度差异显著(p<0.01,d=0.30),但其他维度没有差异。消极领导的得分较低,领导者和员工之间没有差异。有趣的是,受雇医生对他们的实践领导者在两个变革型领导(“绩效发展”、“提供愿景”)和所有交易型维度上的评价更高。LMX-7 量表显示领导者与员工之间的关系质量很高。
本研究通过自我和员工评价对全科医生的领导技能进行了 180°分析,结果表明关系良好。在目标设定、创新和关注个体团队成员方面,领导力有改进的空间。这些结果为制定有针对性的干预措施提供了依据。
德国临床试验注册处,DRKS00012677。于 2019 年 10 月 16 日注册。