Suppr超能文献

评估 iLead,一种通用的实施领导力干预措施:混合方法的预干预-后干预设计。

Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention-postintervention design.

机构信息

Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 12;10(1):e033227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033227.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to evaluate the iLead intervention and to investigate whether or not transfer of training can be supported by contextualising the intervention (recruiting all managers from one branch of the organisation while focusing on one implementation case, as well as training senior management).

DESIGN

A pre-evaluation-postevaluation design was applied using mixed methods with process and effect surveys and interviews to measure the effects on three levels.

SETTING

Healthcare managers from Stockholm's regional healthcare organisation were invited to the training.

PARTICIPANTS

52 managers participated in the iLead intervention. Group 1 consisted of 21 managers from different organisations and with different implementation cases. Group 2, representing the contextualised group, consisted of 31 managers from the same organisation, working on the same implementation case, where senior management also received training.

INTERVENTION

iLead is an intervention where healthcare managers are trained in implementation leadership based on the full-range leadership model.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Reactions, knowledge and implementation leadership are measured.

RESULTS

Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate that iLead was perceived to be of high quality and capable of increasing participants' knowledge. Mixed effects were found regarding changes in behaviours. The contextualisation did not have a boosting effect on behaviour change. Hence, group 2 did not increase its active implementation leadership in comparison with group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

iLead introduces a new approach to how implementation leadership can be trained when knowledge of effective leadership for implementations is combined with findings on the importance of environmental factors for the transfer of training. Even though managers reported general positive effects, transfer was not facilitated through the contextualisation of the intervention. There is a need to further develop approaches to help participants subsequently apply the learnt skills in their work environment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 iLead 干预措施,并探讨通过情境化干预措施(从组织的一个分支机构招募所有管理人员,同时关注一个实施案例,以及培训高级管理人员)是否可以支持培训转移。

设计

采用混合方法的预评估-后评估设计,使用过程和效果调查以及访谈来衡量三个层面的效果。

设置

斯德哥尔摩地区医疗机构的医疗保健经理受邀参加培训。

参与者

52 名经理参加了 iLead 干预措施。第 1 组由来自不同组织和不同实施案例的 21 名经理组成。第 2 组,代表情境化组,由来自同一组织、从事同一实施案例的 31 名经理组成,其中高级管理人员也接受了培训。

干预措施

iLead 是一项干预措施,培训医疗保健经理在实施领导力方面的培训,基于全范围领导力模型。

主要结果测量

反应、知识和实施领导力。

结果

定量和定性分析表明,iLead 被认为质量很高,能够提高参与者的知识。行为变化方面存在混合效应。情境化干预措施对行为变化没有促进作用。因此,与第 1 组相比,第 2 组并没有增加其积极的实施领导力。

结论

iLead 引入了一种新方法,即在将有效的实施领导力知识与环境因素对培训转移的重要性的研究结果相结合的情况下,如何培训实施领导力。尽管经理们报告了普遍的积极影响,但通过干预措施的情境化并没有促进转移。需要进一步开发方法,帮助参与者随后将所学技能应用于工作环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619c/7045007/f87dd9a8a319/bmjopen-2019-033227f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验