D. Bradley McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1593-1598. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad146.
This article reports on the alignment between the foundational domains and the delineation of practice (DoP) for health informatics, both developed by the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). Whereas the foundational domains guide graduate-level curriculum development and accreditation assessment, providing an educational pathway to the minimum competencies needed as a health informatician, the DoP defines the domains, tasks, knowledge, and skills that a professional needs to competently perform in the discipline of health informatics. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the foundational domains need modification to better reflect applied practice.
Using an iterative process and through individual and collective approaches, the foundational domains and the DoP statements were analyzed for alignment and eventual harmonization. Tables and Sankey plot diagrams were used to detail and illustrate the resulting alignment.
We were able to map all the individual DoP knowledge statements and tasks to the AMIA foundational domains, but the statements within a single DoP domain did not all map to the same foundational domain. Even though the AMIA foundational domains and DoP domains are not in perfect alignment, the DoP provides good examples of specific health informatics competencies for most of the foundational domains. There are, however, limited DoP knowledge statements and tasks mapping to foundational domain 6-Social and Behavioral Aspects of Health.
Both the foundational domains and the DoP were developed independently, several years apart, and for different purposes. The mapping analyses reveal similarities and differences between the practice experience and the curricular needs of health informaticians.
The overall alignment of both domains may be explained by the fact that both describe the current and/or future health informatics professional. One can think of the foundational domains as representing the broad foci for educational programs for health informaticians and, hence, they are appropriately the focus of organizations that accredit these programs.
本文介绍了美国医学信息学协会(AMIA)制定的基础领域和实践领域(DoP)之间的一致性。基础领域指导研究生课程的开发和认证评估,为健康信息学家所需的最低能力提供教育途径,而 DoP 则定义了专业人员在健康信息学领域中胜任的领域、任务、知识和技能。本文的目的是确定基础领域是否需要修改,以更好地反映应用实践。
使用迭代过程并通过个人和集体方法,对基础领域和 DoP 语句进行了分析,以确定一致性并最终实现协调。使用表格和 Sankey 图详细说明和说明由此产生的一致性。
我们能够将所有单个 DoP 知识语句和任务映射到 AMIA 基础领域,但单个 DoP 领域内的语句并未全部映射到相同的基础领域。尽管 AMIA 基础领域和 DoP 领域不完全一致,但 DoP 为大多数基础领域提供了特定健康信息学能力的很好示例。但是,映射到基础领域 6-健康的社会和行为方面的 DoP 知识语句和任务有限。
基础领域和 DoP 都是独立开发的,相隔数年,目的也不同。映射分析揭示了健康信息学家实践经验和课程需求之间的相似之处和差异。
两个领域的总体一致性可以用以下事实来解释:两者都描述了当前和/或未来的健康信息专业人员。可以将基础领域视为代表健康信息学家教育计划的广泛重点,因此它们是为这些计划提供认证的组织的重点。