• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越(几何)均值:随机模型破坏了避险者进化的确定性预测。

Beyond the (geometric) mean: stochastic models undermine deterministic predictions of bet hedger evolution.

作者信息

Weissman Maya Rochelle, Raynes Yevgeniy, Weinreich Daniel M

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 11:2023.07.11.548608. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.11.548608.

DOI:10.1101/2023.07.11.548608
PMID:37503082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10369953/
Abstract

Bet hedging is a ubiquitous strategy for risk reduction in the face of unpredictable environmental change where a lineage lowers its variance in fitness across environments at the expense of also lowering its arithmetic mean fitness. Classically, the benefit of bet hedging has been quantified using geometric mean fitness (GMF); bet hedging is expected to evolve if and only if it has a higher GMF than the wild-type. We build upon previous research on the effect of incorporating stochasticity in phenotypic distribution, environment, and reproduction to investigate the extent to which these sources of stochasticity will impact the evolution of real-world bet hedging traits. We utilize both individual-based simulations and Markov chain numerics to demonstrate that modeling stochasticity can alter the sign of selection for the bet hedger compared to deterministic predictions. We find that bet hedging can be deleterious at small population sizes and beneficial at larger population sizes. This non-monotonic dependence of the sign of selection on population size, known as sign inversion, exists across parameter space for both conservative and diversified bet hedgers. We apply our model to published data of bet hedging strategies to show that sign inversion exists for biologically relevant parameters in two study systems: Papaver dubium, an annual poppy with variable germination phenology, and Salmonella typhimurium, a pathogenic bacteria that exhibits antibiotic persistence. Taken together, our results suggest that GMF is not enough to predict when bet hedging is adaptive.

摘要

在面对不可预测的环境变化时,权衡下注是一种普遍存在的降低风险的策略,即一个谱系以牺牲其算术平均适合度为代价,降低其在不同环境下适合度的方差。传统上,权衡下注的益处是用几何平均适合度(GMF)来量化的;当且仅当权衡下注的几何平均适合度高于野生型时,它才有望进化。我们基于之前关于在表型分布、环境和繁殖中纳入随机性的影响的研究,来探究这些随机性来源在多大程度上会影响现实世界中权衡下注性状的进化。我们利用基于个体的模拟和马尔可夫链数值计算来证明,与确定性预测相比,对随机性进行建模可以改变对权衡下注者选择的符号。我们发现,在种群规模较小时,权衡下注可能是有害的,而在种群规模较大时则是有益的。选择符号对种群规模的这种非单调依赖性,即符号反转,在保守型和多样化权衡下注者的参数空间中均存在。我们将我们的模型应用于已发表的权衡下注策略数据,以表明在两个研究系统中,对于生物学相关参数存在符号反转:一种一年生罂粟——具可变萌发物候的野罂粟,以及一种表现出抗生素耐受性的病原菌——鼠伤寒沙门氏菌。综合来看,我们的结果表明,几何平均适合度不足以预测权衡下注何时具有适应性。

相似文献

1
Beyond the (geometric) mean: stochastic models undermine deterministic predictions of bet hedger evolution.超越(几何)均值:随机模型破坏了避险者进化的确定性预测。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 11:2023.07.11.548608. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.11.548608.
2
Beyond the (Geometric) Mean: Stochastic Models Undermine Deterministic Predictions of Bet Hedger Evolution.超越(几何)均值:随机模型破坏了对避险者进化的确定性预测。
Am Nat. 2025 Jun;205(6):572-589. doi: 10.1086/735690. Epub 2025 May 1.
3
Short-term insurance versus long-term bet-hedging strategies as adaptations to variable environments.短期保险与长期风险对冲策略作为适应多变环境的手段。
Evolution. 2019 Feb;73(2):145-157. doi: 10.1111/evo.13659. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
4
Experimental evolution of bet hedging under manipulated environmental uncertainty in Neurospora crassa.在粗糙脉孢菌中,通过操控环境不确定性进行的赌徒式策略的实验性进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jul 22;281(1787). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0706.
5
Individual reversible plasticity as a genotype-level bet-hedging strategy.个体可逆可塑性作为一种基于基因型的风险缓冲策略。
J Evol Biol. 2021 Jul;34(7):1022-1033. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13788. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Bet Hedging Is Not Sufficient to Explain Germination Patterns of a Winter Annual Plant.贝叶斯套期保值不足以解释一种冬季一年生植物的萌发模式。
Am Nat. 2023 Dec;202(6):767-784. doi: 10.1086/726785. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
Evolutionary bet-hedging in the real world: empirical evidence and challenges revealed by plants.现实世界中的进化博弈论:植物提供的实证证据和挑战
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 22;277(1697):3055-64. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0707. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
8
Multiple-batch spawning as a bet-hedging strategy in highly stochastic environments: An exploratory analysis of Atlantic cod.在高度随机的环境中,多批次产卵作为一种风险对冲策略:对大西洋鳕鱼的探索性分析。
Evol Appl. 2021 Jun 10;14(8):1980-1992. doi: 10.1111/eva.13251. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Shortsighted Evolution Constrains the Efficacy of Long-Term Bet Hedging.近视进化限制了长期押注避险的效果。
Am Nat. 2019 Mar;193(3):409-423. doi: 10.1086/701786. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Bet-hedging in parasitoids: when optimization is not the best strategy to cope with climatic extremes.寄生蜂中的风险对冲:当优化并非应对极端气候的最佳策略时。
Curr Res Insect Sci. 2024 Feb 20;5:100076. doi: 10.1016/j.cris.2024.100076. eCollection 2024.