Thorenz Kristin, Berwinkel Andre, Weigelt Matthias
Department of Sport & Health, University of Paderborn, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (EvKB), University of Bielefeld, 33617 Bielefeld, Germany.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 22;13(7):523. doi: 10.3390/bs13070523.
The aim of the present study is to prove the construct validity of the German versions of the Feeling Scale (FS) and the Felt Arousal Scale (FAS) for a progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) exercise. A total of 228 sport science students conducted the PMR exercise for 45 min and completed the FS, the FAS, and the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) in a pre-test-post-test design. A significant decrease in arousal ((227) = 8.296, < 0.001) and a significant increase in pleasure ((227) = 4.748, < 0.001) were observed. For convergent validity, the correlations between the FS and the subscale SAM-P for the valence dimension ( = 0.67, < 0.001) and between the FAS and the subscale SAM-A for the arousal dimension ( = 0.31, < 0.001) were significant. For discriminant validity, the correlations between different constructs (FS and SAM-A, FAS and SAM-P) were not significant, whereas the discriminant analysis between the FS and the FAS revealed a negative significant correlation ( = -0.15, < 0.001). Together, the pattern of results confirms the use of the German versions of the FS and the FAS to measure the affective response for a PMR exercise.
本研究的目的是验证用于渐进性肌肉松弛(PMR)练习的德语版感觉量表(FS)和感觉唤醒量表(FAS)的结构效度。共有228名体育科学专业学生采用前测-后测设计进行了45分钟的PMR练习,并完成了FS、FAS和自我评估人体模型(SAM)。观察到唤醒水平显著降低((227)= 8.296,< 0.001),愉悦感显著增加((227)= 4.748,< 0.001)。对于收敛效度,FS与效价维度的子量表SAM-P之间的相关性(= 0.67,< 0.001)以及FAS与唤醒维度的子量表SAM-A之间的相关性(= 0.31,< 0.001)均显著。对于区分效度,不同结构(FS与SAM-A、FAS与SAM-P)之间的相关性不显著,而FS与FAS之间的判别分析显示出显著的负相关(= -0.15,< 0.001)。总体而言,结果模式证实了使用德语版的FS和FAS来测量PMR练习的情感反应。