• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工具性调情:决策群体中的魅力探索。

Instrumental Flirting: An Exploration of Charm in Decision-Making Groups.

作者信息

Henningsen David, Henningsen Mary Lynn Miller

机构信息

Department of Communication, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;13(7):603. doi: 10.3390/bs13070603.

DOI:10.3390/bs13070603
PMID:37504050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10376592/
Abstract

The scholarship on flirting as a persuasive tactic in the workplace indicates that flirting can have negative consequences for task groups. The goal of this study was to extend the investigation of instrumental flirting by operationalizing this form of flirting as charm and by examining the consequences of charm in decision-making groups for the individual group members. In the current study, participants (60 women, 60 men) made decisions in four-person, mixed sex groups. The results of the study demonstrate that the use of charm was negatively associated with perceptions of group member task competence. Differences in perceptions of charm were also examined.

摘要

关于在职场中将调情作为一种说服策略的学术研究表明,调情可能会给任务小组带来负面影响。本研究的目的是通过将这种调情形式界定为魅力,并考察在决策小组中魅力对个体小组成员的影响,来扩展对工具性调情的研究。在当前研究中,参与者(60名女性,60名男性)在四人混合性别小组中做出决策。研究结果表明,魅力的运用与对小组成员任务能力的认知呈负相关。同时也考察了对魅力认知的差异。

相似文献

1
Instrumental Flirting: An Exploration of Charm in Decision-Making Groups.工具性调情:决策群体中的魅力探索。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;13(7):603. doi: 10.3390/bs13070603.
2
Google for Sexual Relationships: Mixed-Methods Study on Digital Flirting and Online Dating Among Adolescent Youth and Young Adults.谷歌与性关系:关于青少年和青年数字调情与在线约会的混合方法研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 May 16;5(2):e10695. doi: 10.2196/10695.
3
Playing with gender borders: flirting and alcohol consumption among young adults in Denmark.玩转性别界限:丹麦年轻人中的调情与饮酒行为
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2019 Aug 1;36(4):357-372. doi: 10.1177/1455072518807794. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
4
Interpersonal Communication Motives for Flirting Face to Face and Through Texting.面对面和通过短信进行调情的人际沟通动机。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Apr;21(4):229-233. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0608.
5
In no uncertain terms: Group cohesion did not affect exploration and group decision making under low uncertainty.毫不含糊地说:在低不确定性情况下,群体凝聚力并未影响探索和群体决策。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 25;14:1038262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1038262. eCollection 2023.
6
Does extraversion increase following a three-hour flirt training? Exploring two training routes.外向性在经历三小时的搭讪培训后会增加吗?探索两种培训途径。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Jun;63(3):265-274. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12803. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Can a Gender Equity and Family Planning Intervention for Men Change Their Gender Ideology? Results from the CHARM Intervention in Rural India.男性性别平等和计划生育干预能否改变他们的性别认同?印度农村 CHARM 干预的结果。
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Mar;49(1):41-56. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12047. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
8
Ten years risk assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease using Astro-CHARM and pooled cohort equation in a south Asian sub-population.使用 Astro-CHARM 和 pooled cohort equation 在南亚亚人群中进行的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病 10 年风险评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 27;20(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08472-4.
9
Twelve-month organizational study examining the associations among behavioral healthcare worker's perceptions of autonomy, decision-making power, organizational commitment, and burnout: Reconceptualizing the role of commitment in shaping staff member experiences of the work environment.一项为期 12 个月的组织研究,考察了行为医疗保健工作者对自主权、决策权、组织承诺和倦怠感的认知之间的关联:重新概念化承诺在塑造员工工作环境体验方面的作用。
J Community Psychol. 2022 Mar;50(2):1173-1184. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22711. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
10
Dyadic Perceptions of the Decision Process in Families Living With Lung Cancer.肺癌患者家庭决策过程中的二元认知
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jan 1;44(1):108-115. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.108-115.

引用本文的文献

1
Personal Workplace Relationships: Unifying an Understudied Area of Organizational and Personal Life.个人职场关系:整合组织与个人生活中一个研究不足的领域。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 13;13(9):760. doi: 10.3390/bs13090760.

本文引用的文献

1
Feminine charm: an experimental analysis of its costs and benefits in negotiations.女性魅力:谈判中成本与收益的实验分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Oct;38(10):1343-57. doi: 10.1177/0146167212453074. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
2
QUASI-COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR IN PSYCHOTHERAPY.心理治疗中的准求爱行为。
Psychiatry. 1965 Aug;28:245-57. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1965.11023433.
3
Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: the role of control and choice in selecting partners.作为求爱信号的非言语行为:选择伴侣时控制与选择的作用。
Evol Hum Behav. 2000 Nov;21(6):371-390. doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00053-2.
4
Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading.错误管理理论:跨性别读心偏差的新视角。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):81-91. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.81.