• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于人格障碍的心理健康素养:一项多元文化研究。

Mental Health Literacy about Personality Disorders: A Multicultural Study.

作者信息

Altuncu Kerim Alp, Lomoriello Arianna Schiano, Lo Buglio Gabriele, Martino Ludovica, Yenihayat Asrin, Belfiore Maria Teresa, Boldrini Tommaso

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padua, Italy.

Department of Cognitive System, Denmark Technical University (DTU), 2800 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;13(7):605. doi: 10.3390/bs13070605.

DOI:10.3390/bs13070605
PMID:37504052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10376649/
Abstract

Mental health literacy (MHL) refers to lay people's knowledge and beliefs about the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The current study aimed at investigating MHL regarding personality disorders (PDs) multiculturally, comparing Turkish and Italian populations. In total, 262 participants responded to an online vignette identification task that required them to label the PDs of seven hypothetical subjects and rate various dimensions of their disorders. Narcissistic (25%), obsessive-compulsive (13%), and paranoid (12%) PDs were the most correctly labeled, while the average accuracy values for other PDs were below 0.04%. Compared to Turkish participants, Italian participants were more accurate in labeling narcissistic PD. Additionally, of the seven PDs, narcissistic PD was associated with the most happiness and success at work. Subjects with borderline and avoidant PDs were the most recognized as having psychological problems (>90%), yet their PDs were among the least correctly identified. Overall, participants from both cultures were generally successful at recognizing the presence of a mental illness, but they rarely labeled it correctly. Only limited cultural differences emerged. The present findings may inform the design of outreach programs to promote MHL regarding PDs, thereby facilitating early recognition of PDs and help-seeking behaviors for affected individuals.

摘要

心理健康素养(MHL)是指非专业人士对精神疾病诊断和治疗的知识与信念。当前研究旨在跨文化调查关于人格障碍(PDs)的心理健康素养,比较土耳其和意大利人群。共有262名参与者回应了一项在线案例识别任务,该任务要求他们对七个假设对象的人格障碍进行标注,并对其障碍的各个维度进行评分。自恋型(25%)、强迫型(13%)和偏执型(12%)人格障碍被正确标注的比例最高,而其他人格障碍的平均准确率低于0.04%。与土耳其参与者相比,意大利参与者在标注自恋型人格障碍时更准确。此外,在这七种人格障碍中,自恋型人格障碍与工作中最大的幸福感和成功率相关。边缘型和回避型人格障碍患者被认为存在心理问题的比例最高(>90%),但其人格障碍被正确识别的比例却最低。总体而言,来自两种文化的参与者在识别精神疾病的存在方面总体上是成功的,但他们很少能正确标注。仅出现了有限的文化差异。本研究结果可为促进关于人格障碍的心理健康素养的外展项目设计提供参考,从而促进对人格障碍的早期识别以及为受影响个体提供寻求帮助的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/f61cb6bf3fee/behavsci-13-00605-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/5996be1083e2/behavsci-13-00605-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/fa598101c040/behavsci-13-00605-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/87c5c9383771/behavsci-13-00605-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/99308d7d0106/behavsci-13-00605-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/f61cb6bf3fee/behavsci-13-00605-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/5996be1083e2/behavsci-13-00605-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/fa598101c040/behavsci-13-00605-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/87c5c9383771/behavsci-13-00605-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/99308d7d0106/behavsci-13-00605-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fdf/10376649/f61cb6bf3fee/behavsci-13-00605-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Mental Health Literacy about Personality Disorders: A Multicultural Study.关于人格障碍的心理健康素养:一项多元文化研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;13(7):605. doi: 10.3390/bs13070605.
2
Mental health literacy: a cross-cultural approach to knowledge and beliefs about depression, schizophrenia and generalized anxiety disorder.心理健康素养:一种关于抑郁症、精神分裂症和广泛性焦虑症的知识与信念的跨文化研究方法。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 8;6:1272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01272. eCollection 2015.
3
The Relationships between Personality Disorders and Early Maladaptive Schemas and the Moderating Role of Gender.人格障碍与早期适应不良图式之间的关系以及性别的调节作用。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 19;22(1):12-18. doi: 10.5455/apd.114935. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for DSM-IV personality disorders: a multivariate twin study.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍的遗传和环境风险因素结构:一项多变量双胞胎研究
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;65(12):1438-46. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1438.
5
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
6
Comorbid Personality Disorders in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Its Symptom Dimensions.强迫症及其症状维度中的共病性人格障碍
Psychiatr Q. 2016 Jun;87(2):365-76. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9393-z.
7
Which DSM-IV personality disorders are most strongly associated with indices of psychosocial morbidity in psychiatric outpatients?在精神科门诊患者中,哪些 DSM-IV 人格障碍与心理社会发病率的指标关联最强?
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;53(7):940-5. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
8
The relationship between anxiety disorders and dimensional representations of DSM-IV personality disorders: A co-twin control study.焦虑症与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍维度表征之间的关系:一项双胞胎对照研究。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
9
Personality disorders and physical comorbidities in adults from the United States: data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.美国成年人中的人格障碍与躯体共病:来自酒精及相关状况全国流行病学调查的数据
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 May;50(5):807-20. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0974-1. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
10
Clinician ratings of the five-factor model of personality and the DSM-IV personality disorders.临床医生对人格五因素模型和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》人格障碍的评定。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1997 Jun;185(6):388-93. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199706000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring mental health professionals' emotional responses with individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder or psychopathy: a scoping review.探索心理健康专业人员对被诊断患有反社会人格障碍或精神病态者的情绪反应:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 25;16:1501273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1501273. eCollection 2025.
2
Harmonizing early intervention strategies: scoping review of clinical high risk for psychosis and borderline personality disorder.协调早期干预策略:对精神病和边缘性人格障碍临床高危状态的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 20;15:1381864. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1381864. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Dimensional models of personality disorders: Challenges and opportunities.人格障碍的维度模型:挑战与机遇。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 7;14:1098452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098452. eCollection 2023.
2
Degenerate pathway for processing smile and other emotional expressions in congenital facial palsy: an hdEEG investigation.先天性面瘫处理微笑和其他情绪表达的退化途径:一项高清 EEG 研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Nov 7;377(1863):20210190. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0190. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
3
Homo œconomicus: A Key for Understanding Late Modernity Narcissism?
Clinical utility of the at-risk for psychosis state beyond transition: A multidimensional network analysis.
精神病状态风险超出转变阶段的临床效用:多维网络分析
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;34(1):287-296. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02491-x. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
经济人:理解现代晚期自恋的关键?
Psychopathology. 2023;56(3):173-182. doi: 10.1159/000525678. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
4
Shared Attention Amplifies the Neural Processing of Emotional Faces.共同注意增强了情绪面孔的神经加工。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 May 2;34(6):917-932. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01841.
5
Promotion of Mental Health Literacy in Adolescents: A Scoping Review.促进青少年心理健康素养:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 9;18(18):9500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189500.
6
Altering sensorimotor simulation impacts early stages of facial expression processing depending on individual differences in alexithymic traits.改变感觉运动模拟会根据个体在述情障碍特征上的差异影响面部表情处理的早期阶段。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Mar;148:105678. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105678. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
7
Psychotherapy During COVID-19: How the Clinical Practice of Italian Psychotherapists Changed During the Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的心理治疗:意大利心理治疗师的临床实践在大流行期间如何变化。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:591170. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591170. eCollection 2020.
8
Universal and selective interventions to promote good mental health in young people: Systematic review and meta-analysis.促进青少年良好心理健康的普遍和选择性干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Dec;41:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
Guidelines for Training in Cultural Psychiatry.文化精神病学培训指南。
Can J Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;66(2):195-246. doi: 10.1177/0706743720907505. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
10
What is good mental health? A scoping review.什么是良好的心理健康?范围综述。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Feb;31:33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.105. Epub 2019 Dec 31.