• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘生物制剂的比较影响:一项基于全美索赔数据的分析。

Comparative Impact of Asthma Biologics: A Nationwide US Claim-Based Analysis.

机构信息

Section of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.

Section of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Jun;12(6):1558-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.029. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.029
PMID:38423294
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biologic modifiers targeting type 2 (T2) airway inflammation are effective in reducing asthma exacerbation. However, real-world and comparative effectiveness studies remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

To examine and compare the real-world impact of anti-T2 asthma biologics.

METHODS

In this retrospective, new user cohort study, we used the MarketScan, a Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, to identify adult patients with asthma who began to receive an anti-T2 biologic agent (anti-IL-5s, dupilumab, or omalizumab). We examined the influence of the biologic class on asthma exacerbation by comparing the average number of asthma exacerbation 1 year before and after biologic initiation. We conducted multivariable regression analyses to compare the effectiveness of these asthma biologics on reducing the incidence of asthma exacerbations within 18 months of the initial administration of biologics while controlling for demographic variables, comorbidities, and asthma severity.

RESULTS

We identified 5,538 asthma patients who were new to taking an anti-T2 biologic [mean age [±SD], 45.6 (12.78) years; 65.8% female). Asthma biologics reduced asthma exacerbation by 11% to 47%, particularly among patients with two or more asthma exacerbations in the year preceding biologic initiation (31% to 65% reduction). Biologics were especially effective in reducing asthma-related hospitalizations (44.6% to 60%). After adjusting for baseline demographics, asthma medication, and comorbidities, dupilumab was associated with a lower estimated mean number of asthma exacerbation per year and lower adjusted odds ratio for developing an asthma exacerbation relative to other biologics (50% to 80% less likely).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-T2 asthma biologics reduced asthma exacerbation in real-word settings. Evidence supports growing literature reporting that dupilumab might have a more favorable impact on asthma exacerbation relative to other asthma biologics.

摘要

背景

针对 2 型(T2)气道炎症的生物调节剂可有效减少哮喘恶化。然而,真实世界和比较有效性研究仍然有限。

目的

研究和比较抗 T2 哮喘生物制剂的真实世界影响。

方法

在这项回顾性、新用户队列研究中,我们使用 MarketScan,这是一个商业索赔和遭遇数据库,来识别开始接受抗 T2 生物制剂(抗 IL-5s、度普利尤单抗或奥马珠单抗)的成年哮喘患者。我们通过比较生物制剂起始前 1 年和起始后 1 年哮喘恶化的平均次数,来研究生物制剂类别对哮喘恶化的影响。我们进行了多变量回归分析,以比较这些哮喘生物制剂在控制人口统计学变量、合并症和哮喘严重程度的情况下,在初始使用生物制剂后 18 个月内降低哮喘恶化发生率的效果。

结果

我们确定了 5538 名新开始接受抗 T2 生物制剂的哮喘患者[平均年龄(±标准差),45.6(12.78)岁;65.8%为女性]。哮喘生物制剂可将哮喘恶化减少 11%至 47%,尤其是在生物制剂起始前一年有两次或更多次哮喘恶化的患者中(减少 31%至 65%)。生物制剂尤其能有效减少与哮喘相关的住院治疗(减少 44.6%至 60%)。在调整基线人口统计学、哮喘药物和合并症后,与其他生物制剂相比,度普利尤单抗与每年哮喘恶化的估计平均次数较低以及发生哮喘恶化的调整后比值比较低相关(减少 50%至 80%)。

结论

抗 T2 哮喘生物制剂可减少真实环境中的哮喘恶化。有证据支持越来越多的文献报道,与其他哮喘生物制剂相比,度普利尤单抗可能对哮喘恶化有更有利的影响。

相似文献

1
Comparative Impact of Asthma Biologics: A Nationwide US Claim-Based Analysis.哮喘生物制剂的比较影响:一项基于全美索赔数据的分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Jun;12(6):1558-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.029. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Smaller Differences in the Comparative Effectiveness of Biologics in Reducing Asthma-Related Hospitalizations Compared With Overall Exacerbations.生物制剂在降低哮喘相关住院率方面的疗效比较差异较小,而在总体恶化方面则较大。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Jun;12(6):1568-1574.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.034. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Safety of Biological Therapies for Severe Asthma: An Analysis of Suspected Adverse Reactions Reported in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.重度哮喘生物疗法的安全性:对世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库中报告的疑似不良反应的分析。
BioDrugs. 2024 May;38(3):425-448. doi: 10.1007/s40259-024-00653-6. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
Omalizumab as alternative to chronic use of oral corticosteroids in severe asthma.奥马珠单抗可作为严重哮喘中慢性口服皮质类固醇替代疗法。
Respir Med. 2019 Apr;150:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
Impact of benralizumab on asthma exacerbation-related medical healthcare resource utilization and medical costs: results from the ZEPHYR 2 study.倍利珠单抗对哮喘加重相关医疗保健资源利用和医疗费用的影响:ZEPHYR 2研究结果
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):954-962. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2236867.
6
Pairwise indirect treatment comparison of dupilumab versus other biologics in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma.在未控制的持续性哮喘患者中,度普利尤单抗与其他生物制剂的两两间接治疗比较。
Respir Med. 2022 Jan;191:105991. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105991. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
Efficacy and safety of treatment with biologicals (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab and reslizumab) for severe eosinophilic asthma. A systematic review for the EAACI Guidelines - recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma.生物制剂(贝那利珠单抗、度普利尤单抗、美泊利单抗、奥马珠单抗和瑞利珠单抗)治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的疗效和安全性。EAACI指南的系统评价——关于生物制剂在重度哮喘中应用的建议
Allergy. 2020 May;75(5):1023-1042. doi: 10.1111/all.14221. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Mepolizumab, Benralizumab, and Dupilumab among Patients with Difficult-to-Control Asthma: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity-matched Analysis.美泊利单抗、贝那利珠单抗和度普利尤单抗在难治性哮喘患者中的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向匹配分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Jun;21(6):866-874. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202306-566OC.
9
Mabs for treating asthma: omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab.用于治疗哮喘的单克隆抗体:奥马珠单抗、美泊利单抗、瑞利珠单抗、贝那利珠单抗、度普利尤单抗。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Oct 2;16(10):2349-2356. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1753440. Epub 2020 May 13.
10
Clinical and economic burden of severe asthma among US patients treated with biologic therapies.美国接受生物疗法治疗的重度哮喘患者的临床和经济负担。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Sep;127(3):318-325.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Real world evidence of dupilumab effectiveness in a Colombian cohort of patients diagnosed with severe asthma.度普利尤单抗在哥伦比亚一组重度哮喘确诊患者中的真实世界疗效证据。
Front Allergy. 2025 May 13;6:1564033. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1564033. eCollection 2025.
2
Head-To-Head Comparison of Biologic Efficacy in Asthma: What Have We Learned?哮喘生物疗效的直接比较:我们学到了什么?
Allergy. 2025 May;80(5):1226-1241. doi: 10.1111/all.16537. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
3
Biologics in T2 Severe Asthma: Unveiling Different Effectiveness by Real-World Indirect Comparison.
2型重度哮喘中的生物制剂:通过真实世界间接比较揭示不同疗效
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4750. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164750.