• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在商业航班中过敏反应的发生率有多高?系统评价和荟萃分析。

How Common Are Allergic Reactions During Commercial Flights? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Allergy Department, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Nov;11(11):3400-3406.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.07.025. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.07.025
PMID:37507067
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Global passenger demand for air travel has increased by over 7% annually since 2006, with a strong recovery following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Prior to COVID-19, individuals with food allergies reported significant concern and anxiety over the risk of reactions when travelling by air. However, published data of in-flight medical events (IMEs) due to allergic reactions are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a systematic review with meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of IMEs due to allergic reactions on commercial flights.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and TRANSPORT databases and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies reporting IMEs of allergic etiology, published since 1980. Data were extracted in duplicate for meta-analysis, and risk of bias assessed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022384341.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. At meta-analysis, a pooled estimate of 2.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.6%-3.1%) of IMEs are coded as being due to allergic reactions. This may be higher in children (3.1%; 95% CI 1.5%-6.6%). The incidence of allergic IMEs at meta-analysis was 0.7 events per million passengers (95% CI 0.4-1.1). Reassuringly, the rate of allergic IMEs has been stable over the past 30 years, despite increasing passenger numbers and food allergy prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergic reactions coded as IMEs during commercial air travel are uncommon, occurring at an incidence approximately 10 to 100 times lower than that reported for accidental allergic reactions to food occurring in the community. Despite increasing passenger numbers and food allergy prevalence, the rate of allergic IMEs has not changed over the past 3 decades.

摘要

背景

自 2006 年以来,全球航空旅行的乘客需求每年增长超过 7%,在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行后强劲复苏。在 COVID-19 之前,食物过敏的个人在乘坐飞机旅行时对反应风险表示严重关注和焦虑。然而,由于过敏反应导致的飞行中医疗事件(IME)的已发表数据有限。

目的

进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以估计商业航班因过敏反应引起的 IME 发生率。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO 和 TRANSPORT 数据库以及 Cochrane 对照试验登记处,以查找自 1980 年以来报告过敏病因 IME 的相关研究。对数据进行了双重提取以进行荟萃分析,并评估了偏倚风险。

研究注册

PROSPERO CRD42022384341。

结果

17 项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析得出,2.2%(95%置信区间[95%CI]1.6%-3.1%)的 IME 编码为过敏反应。在儿童中可能更高(3.1%;95%CI 1.5%-6.6%)。荟萃分析中过敏 IME 的发生率为每百万乘客 0.7 例(95%CI 0.4-1.1)。令人欣慰的是,尽管乘客人数和食物过敏患病率增加,但过去 30 年来,过敏 IME 的发生率保持稳定。

结论

在商业航空旅行中编码为 IME 的过敏反应并不常见,其发生率大约比社区中意外食物过敏反应报告的发生率低 10 到 100 倍。尽管乘客人数和食物过敏患病率增加,但过去 30 年来,过敏 IME 的发生率并未发生变化。

相似文献

1
How Common Are Allergic Reactions During Commercial Flights? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在商业航班中过敏反应的发生率有多高?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Nov;11(11):3400-3406.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.07.025. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Incidence of food anaphylaxis in people with food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.食物过敏人群中食物过敏反应的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 Nov;45(11):1621-36. doi: 10.1111/cea.12477.
4
The global incidence of in-flight medical emergencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of approximately 1.5 billion airline passengers.机上医疗紧急情况的全球发病率:对约15亿航空乘客的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
5
Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.婴幼儿皮肤护理干预措施预防特应性皮炎和食物过敏。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 5;2(2):CD013534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013534.pub2.
6
Skin care interventions in infants for preventing eczema and food allergy.婴幼儿皮肤护理干预措施预防特应性皮炎和食物过敏。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 14;11(11):CD013534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013534.pub3.
7
Relationship between perioperative anaphylaxis and history of allergies or allergic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.围手术期过敏反应与过敏史或过敏性疾病的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析及荟萃回归。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 Jun;94:111408. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111408. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
8
Incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis in people with food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.食物过敏人群中致命食物过敏反应的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Dec;43(12):1333-41. doi: 10.1111/cea.12211.
9
10
Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在过敏反应中使用多种肾上腺素剂量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Nov;148(5):1307-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of anaphylaxis on commercial flights.商业航班上发生过敏反应的风险。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Oct 1;25(5):336-342. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000001090. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
2
Flying with nut and other food allergies: unravelling fact from fiction.携带坚果及其他食物过敏乘坐飞机:拨开事实与虚构的迷雾
Arch Dis Child. 2025 Apr 17;110(5):334-340. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327848.