• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电生理证据表明,同时存在的社会威胁会引发敏感化效应。

Electrophysiological evidence for sensitization effects elicited by concurrent social threats.

机构信息

Division of Experimental Psychology and Neuropsychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

Division of Social, Organizational, and Economic Psychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 28;13(1):12285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39456-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-39456-0
PMID:37507440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10382520/
Abstract

Experiencing a social threat, such as social exclusion, is a painful event. In contrast to previous studies providing insight into the processing of a single short-termed threat, we exposed healthy individuals to the simultaneous onset of different social threats. This approach allowed us to track whether these threats are processed independently-or whether they interact in a common system. Using a virtual ball-throwing game (Cyberball), electrophysiological (event-related brain potentials, ERPs) and behavioral (self-reports) responses were collected. We assigned undergraduates to three experimental groups: single threat exclusion (n = 24), single threat loss of control (n = 26), and joint onset of both threats (dual-threat, n = 25). Self-reports indicated an increase in threats (i.e., in perceived exclusion and loss-of-control) in the latter group. The ERPs disentangled the neural responses to each threat: In the dual-threat group, the amplitudes of the P3 responses to exclusionary and intervention events were enhanced. This indicates that individuals are sensitized to each of the threats when the other threat is present simultaneously. Our findings support the theoretical notion of a common cognitive system responding to violations in subjective expectations.

摘要

体验社会威胁,如社会排斥,是一件痛苦的事情。与之前的研究不同,这些研究深入探讨了单一短期威胁的处理过程,我们让健康个体同时面临不同的社会威胁。这种方法使我们能够追踪这些威胁是独立处理的,还是在一个共同的系统中相互作用。我们使用虚拟投球游戏(Cyberball)来收集电生理(事件相关脑电位,ERPs)和行为(自我报告)反应。我们将本科生分配到三个实验组:单一威胁排斥(n=24)、单一威胁失去控制(n=26)和同时出现两种威胁(双重威胁,n=25)。自我报告表明,在后一组中,威胁感(即感知到的排斥和失去控制)增加。ERPs 分离了对每种威胁的神经反应:在双重威胁组中,排斥和干预事件的 P3 反应幅度增强。这表明当另一个威胁同时存在时,个体对每个威胁都变得敏感。我们的发现支持了一个共同认知系统对主观期望违反做出反应的理论观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a356/10382520/1d202739dc40/41598_2023_39456_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a356/10382520/68cc3fd2d898/41598_2023_39456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a356/10382520/1d202739dc40/41598_2023_39456_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a356/10382520/68cc3fd2d898/41598_2023_39456_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a356/10382520/1d202739dc40/41598_2023_39456_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Electrophysiological evidence for sensitization effects elicited by concurrent social threats.电生理证据表明,同时存在的社会威胁会引发敏感化效应。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 28;13(1):12285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39456-0.
2
Preexposure to one social threat alters responses to another social threat: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.先前暴露于一种社会威胁会改变对另一种社会威胁的反应:行为和电生理证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Feb;24(1):126-142. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01151-y. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
3
The effect of the physical presence of co-players on perceived ostracism and event-related brain potentials in the cyberball paradigm.共同玩家的身体存在对网络球范式中被排斥感和事件相关脑电位的影响。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 9;8(8):e71928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071928. eCollection 2013.
4
ERP effects and perceived exclusion in the Cyberball paradigm: Correlates of expectancy violation?在赛博球范式中的事件相关电位效应与感知到的排斥:违背预期的相关因素?
Brain Res. 2015 Oct 22;1624:265-274. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
5
Target and Non-Target Processing during Oddball and Cyberball: A Comparative Event-Related Potential Study.Oddball任务和Cyberball游戏中的目标与非目标处理:一项比较性事件相关电位研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153941. eCollection 2016.
6
From Loss of Control to Social Exclusion: ERP Effects of Preexposure to a Social Threat in the Cyberball Paradigm.从失控到社会排斥:网络投球范式中预先暴露于社会威胁的事件相关电位效应
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 10;12(9):1225. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091225.
7
Being low prepares for being neglected: Verticality affects expectancy of social participation.地位低下会让人做好被忽视的准备:地位高低会影响社会参与的预期。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):574-581. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1115-5.
8
Violated Expectations in the Cyberball Paradigm: Testing the Expectancy Account of Social Participation With ERP.网络投球范式中违背的预期:用事件相关电位测试社会参与的预期账户
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 25;9:1762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01762. eCollection 2018.
9
Under threat of social exclusion, females exclude more than males.在社会排斥的威胁下,女性比男性更具排斥性。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):538-44. doi: 10.1177/0956797611402511. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
10
Holding soft objects increases expectation and disappointment in the Cyberball task.拿柔软的物体增加了在“Cyberball 任务”中的期望和失望感。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 23;14(4):e0215772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215772. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses to Overinclusion Following Preexposure to Social Threat.社会威胁预暴露后对过度包含的电生理和行为反应。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Jul;62(7):e70107. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70107.
2
Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals.直接注视和回避注视会调节与事件相关的大脑对社会排斥信号的反应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97840-4.
3
Preexposure to one social threat alters responses to another social threat: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

本文引用的文献

1
From Loss of Control to Social Exclusion: ERP Effects of Preexposure to a Social Threat in the Cyberball Paradigm.从失控到社会排斥:网络投球范式中预先暴露于社会威胁的事件相关电位效应
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 10;12(9):1225. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091225.
2
Resting (Tonic) Blood Pressure Is Associated With Sensitivity to Imagined and Acute Experiences of Social Pain: Evidence From Three Studies.静息(基础)血压与对想象和急性社会疼痛体验的敏感性相关:来自三项研究的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Jun;33(6):984-998. doi: 10.1177/09567976211061107. Epub 2022 May 25.
3
A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model.
先前暴露于一种社会威胁会改变对另一种社会威胁的反应:行为和电生理证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Feb;24(1):126-142. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01151-y. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
期望违背情境下期望更新与维持的调查修订框架:ViolEx 2.0模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 11;12:726432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726432. eCollection 2021.
4
Processing of increased frequency of social interaction in social anxiety disorder and borderline personality disorder.社交焦虑障碍和边缘型人格障碍中社会互动频率增加的处理。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 9;11(1):5489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85027-6.
5
Electroencephalographic correlates of temporal Bayesian belief updating and surprise.脑电活动与时间贝叶斯信念更新和惊讶的关系。
Neuroimage. 2021 May 1;231:117867. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117867. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
6
Social exclusion reliably engages the default network: A meta-analysis of Cyberball.社会排斥可靠地激活默认网络:对赛博球实验的元分析。
Neuroimage. 2021 Feb 15;227:117666. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117666. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
7
The vicious circle of social exclusion and psychopathology: a systematic review of experimental ostracism research in psychiatric disorders.社会排斥与精神病理学的恶性循环:对精神疾病中实验性排斥研究的系统评价
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Aug;270(5):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s00406-019-01074-1. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
8
Loss of control as a violation of expectations: Testing the predictions of a common inconsistency compensation approach in an inclusionary cyberball game.失控违反期望:在包容的网络球游戏中测试常见不一致性补偿方法的预测。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 9;14(9):e0221817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221817. eCollection 2019.
9
Violated Expectations in the Cyberball Paradigm: Testing the Expectancy Account of Social Participation With ERP.网络投球范式中违背的预期:用事件相关电位测试社会参与的预期账户
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 25;9:1762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01762. eCollection 2018.
10
Feeling excluded no matter what? Bias in the processing of social participation in borderline personality disorder.无论如何都感到被排斥?边缘型人格障碍中社会参与处理的偏见。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 26;19:343-350. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.031. eCollection 2018.