Tsagkalidis Vasileios, Blaszczyk Maryjka B, In Haejin
Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 18;15(14):3662. doi: 10.3390/cancers15143662.
Gastric cancer is among the top five causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Preoperative chemotherapy has been established as an option in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. However, chemotherapy yields variable results, owing to the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of this disease. Identifying patients who did or did not respond to preoperative therapy can allow clinicians to alter treatment modalities and provide important information related to prognostication. A pathologic response to preoperative therapies, called the Tumor Response Grade (TRG), has been evaluated to quantify treatment response. Multiple systems for TRG have been established. However, the literature has demonstrated inconsistent results for TRG systems and prognosis, possibly due to variability in interpretation of tumor response between systems and interobserver variability. Radiographic responses to preoperative therapies using RECIST 1.1 criteria and endoscopically assessed tumor response have demonstrated association with survival; however, their use in gastric cancer remains challenging given the inability to accurately and consistently identify and measure the tumor, especially in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy, where treatment-related changes can obscure the gastric wall layers. While the response to preoperative therapies with positron emission tomography (PET) has shown promising results in esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) malignancies, its role in gastric cancer is still under investigation. This review is focused on summarizing the available literature related to evaluating TRG in gastric cancer, as well as providing a brief overview of the use of radiographic and endoscopic methods to assess response to preoperative therapies. Lastly, we outline future directions regarding the use of a universal TRG system to guide care and assist with prognosis.
胃癌是全球癌症相关死亡的五大主要原因之一。术前化疗已被确立为局部晚期胃癌患者的一种治疗选择。然而,由于该疾病的细胞和分子异质性,化疗效果存在差异。识别对术前治疗有反应或无反应的患者,可以使临床医生改变治疗方式,并提供与预后相关的重要信息。一种对术前治疗的病理反应,称为肿瘤反应分级(TRG),已被用于评估治疗反应。已经建立了多种TRG系统。然而,文献表明TRG系统与预后的结果并不一致,这可能是由于不同系统对肿瘤反应的解释存在差异以及观察者之间的差异。使用RECIST 1.1标准评估术前治疗的影像学反应以及内镜评估的肿瘤反应已证明与生存率相关;然而,鉴于无法准确且一致地识别和测量肿瘤,尤其是在新辅助治疗的情况下,治疗相关的变化会模糊胃壁各层,因此它们在胃癌中的应用仍然具有挑战性。虽然正电子发射断层扫描(PET)对术前治疗的反应在食管癌和食管胃交界(EGJ)恶性肿瘤中已显示出有前景的结果,但其在胃癌中的作用仍在研究中。本综述重点总结了与评估胃癌TRG相关的现有文献,并简要概述了使用影像学和内镜方法评估术前治疗反应的情况。最后,我们概述了关于使用通用TRG系统指导治疗和辅助预后的未来方向。