• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚合物的选择而非网片结构变化可降低体内细菌感染风险。

Choice of Polymer, but Not Mesh Structure Variation, Reduces the Risk of Bacterial Infection with In Vivo.

作者信息

Schmitz Sophia M, Helmedag Marius J, Kroh Andreas, Heise Daniel, Klinge Uwe, Lambertz Andreas, Hornef Mathias W, Neumann Ulf P, Eickhoff Roman M

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Department of Medical Microbiology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2023 Jul 24;11(7):2083. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11072083.

DOI:10.3390/biomedicines11072083
PMID:37509722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10377515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Synthetic mesh material is of great importance for surgical incisional hernia repair. The physical and biochemical characteristics of the mesh influence mechanical stability and the foreign body tissue reaction. The influence on bacterial infections, however, remains ill-defined. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of a modified mesh structure with variation in filament linking on the occurrence of bacterial infection that is indicated by the occurrence of CD68, CD4, and CD8 cells in two different materials.

METHODS

A total of 56 male Sprague Dawley rats received a surgical mesh implant in a subcutaneous abdominal position. The mesh of two different polymers (polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF)) and two different structures (standard structure and bold structure with higher filament linking) were compared. During the implantation, the meshes were infected with . After 7 and 21 days, meshes were explanted, and the early and late tissue responses to infection were histologically evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, the inflammatory tissue response was higher at 7 days when compared to 21 days. At 7 days, PP meshes of the standard structure (PP-S) showed the strongest inflammatory tissue response in comparison to all the other groups. At 21 days, no statistically significant difference between different meshes was detected. CD8 cytotoxic T cells showed a significant difference at 21 days but not at 7 days. PP meshes of both structures showed a higher infiltration of CD8 T cells than PVDF meshes. CD4 T helper cells differed at 7 days but not at 21 days, and PVDF meshes in a bold structure showed the highest CD4 T cell count. The number of CD68 macrophages was also significantly higher in PP meshes in a standard structure when compared to PVDF meshes at 21 days.

CONCLUSION

The inflammatory tissue response to infection appears to be highest during the early period after mesh implantation. PP meshes showed a higher inflammatory response than PVDF meshes. The mesh material appears to be more important for the risk of infection than the variation in filament linking.

摘要

背景

合成网状材料对手术切口疝修补至关重要。网片的物理和生化特性影响机械稳定性和异物组织反应。然而,其对细菌感染的影响仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估细丝连接方式不同的改良网状结构对细菌感染发生率的影响,通过两种不同材料中CD68、CD4和CD8细胞的出现情况来表明。

方法

总共56只雄性Sprague Dawley大鼠在腹部皮下植入手术网片。比较了两种不同聚合物(聚丙烯(PP)和聚偏二氟乙烯(PVDF))以及两种不同结构(标准结构和细丝连接更多的加粗结构)的网片。植入过程中,网片被 感染。7天和21天后,取出网片,通过组织学评估对感染的早期和晚期组织反应。

结果

总体而言,与21天时相比,7天时炎症组织反应更高。7天时,标准结构的PP网片(PP-S)与所有其他组相比显示出最强的炎症组织反应。21天时,不同网片之间未检测到统计学上的显著差异。CD8细胞毒性T细胞在21天时显示出显著差异,但在7天时没有。两种结构的PP网片均显示出比PVDF网片更高的CD8 T细胞浸润。CD4辅助性T细胞在7天时有所不同,但在21天时没有,加粗结构的PVDF网片显示出最高的CD4 T细胞计数。与21天时的PVDF网片相比,标准结构的PP网片中CD68巨噬细胞的数量也显著更高。

结论

网状植入物植入后的早期,对感染的炎症组织反应似乎最高。PP网片比PVDF网片显示出更高的炎症反应。网片材料似乎比细丝连接方式的变化对感染风险更重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/bf7e27c1218c/biomedicines-11-02083-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/6112b132adf3/biomedicines-11-02083-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/5f09e3a2de1e/biomedicines-11-02083-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/07316bf29207/biomedicines-11-02083-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/6fe834d2c21f/biomedicines-11-02083-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/218e72a1b0b2/biomedicines-11-02083-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/8f85e81f2433/biomedicines-11-02083-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/aa59a0ccf045/biomedicines-11-02083-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/bdbdd5a7a47d/biomedicines-11-02083-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/1ae36e13d65d/biomedicines-11-02083-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/7885e2d79610/biomedicines-11-02083-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/bf7e27c1218c/biomedicines-11-02083-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/6112b132adf3/biomedicines-11-02083-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/5f09e3a2de1e/biomedicines-11-02083-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/07316bf29207/biomedicines-11-02083-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/6fe834d2c21f/biomedicines-11-02083-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/218e72a1b0b2/biomedicines-11-02083-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/8f85e81f2433/biomedicines-11-02083-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/aa59a0ccf045/biomedicines-11-02083-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/bdbdd5a7a47d/biomedicines-11-02083-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/1ae36e13d65d/biomedicines-11-02083-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/7885e2d79610/biomedicines-11-02083-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69b7/10377515/bf7e27c1218c/biomedicines-11-02083-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Choice of Polymer, but Not Mesh Structure Variation, Reduces the Risk of Bacterial Infection with In Vivo.聚合物的选择而非网片结构变化可降低体内细菌感染风险。
Biomedicines. 2023 Jul 24;11(7):2083. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11072083.
2
Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model.聚偏二氟乙烯/聚丙烯网片用于啮齿动物腹腔植入的粘连形成
Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):327-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9923-y. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
3
Degradation resistance of PVDF mesh in vivo in comparison to PP mesh.PVDF 网体内降解抗性与 PP 网比较。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Jul;119:104490. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104490. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.体内研究比较各种聚丙烯补片在内镜下完全腹膜外(TEP)修补术中的生物相容性及其操作特性:一项在猪身上的实验研究。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):211-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8113-1. Epub 2003 Dec 29.
5
A preclinical evaluation of alternative synthetic biomaterials for fascial defect repair using a rat abdominal hernia model.一种使用大鼠腹疝模型对替代合成生物材料进行筋膜缺损修复的临床前评估。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050044. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
6
PVDF as a new polymer for the construction of surgical meshes.聚偏二氟乙烯作为一种用于构建手术网片的新型聚合物。
Biomaterials. 2002 Aug;23(16):3487-93. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00070-4.
7
Comparison of long-term biocompability of PVDF and PP meshes.聚偏氟乙烯和聚丙烯网片的长期生物相容性比较。
J Invest Surg. 2011;24(6):292-9. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2011.589883.
8
New polymer for intra-abdominal meshes--PVDF copolymer.用于腹腔内补片的新型聚合物——聚偏二氟乙烯共聚物
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008 Nov;87(2):321-8. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31106.
9
Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.腹疝修补术中粘连预防:一项比较三种推荐用于腹腔内使用的轻质多孔补片的实验研究。
Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1541-3. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
Tissue engineered multifunctional chitosan-modified polypropylene hernia mesh loaded with bioactive phyto-extracts.负载生物活性植物提取物的组织工程多功能壳聚糖改性聚丙烯疝修补补片。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2024 Jun;271(Pt 1):132282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132282. Epub 2024 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Polypropylene surgical mesh induces lipid oxidation in a nonhuman primate model.聚丙烯外科补片在非人灵长类动物模型中诱导脂质氧化。
Acta Biomater. 2025 May 15;198:207-218. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.04.003. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
The early outcomes of complex abdominal wall reconstruction with polyvinylidene (PVDF) mesh in the setting of active infection: a prospective series.活性感染条件下聚偏二氟乙烯(PVDF)网在复杂腹壁重建中的早期结果:一项前瞻性系列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):3089-3099. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02625-2. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
2
CD68+ macrophages as crucial components of the foreign body reaction demonstrate an unconventional pattern of functional markers quantified by analysis with double fluorescence staining.CD68+ 巨噬细胞作为异物反应的关键组成部分,通过双重荧光染色分析显示出非常规的功能标志物模式。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020 Nov;108(8):3134-3146. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34639. Epub 2020 May 30.
3
Mesh implants for hernia repair: an update.
疝修补用网片植入物:更新。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Oct;15(10):735-746. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1529565. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
4
Use of an experimental model to evaluate infection resistance of meshes in abdominal wall surgery.使用实验模型评估腹壁手术中网片的抗感染能力。
J Surg Res. 2016 Dec;206(2):435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.056. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
5
Bacterial adhesion to biological versus polymer prosthetic materials used in abdominal wall defect repair: do these meshes show any differences in vitro?用于腹壁缺损修复的生物材料与聚合物假体材料上细菌的黏附:这些补片在体外是否存在差异?
Hernia. 2015 Dec;19(6):965-73. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1378-1. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
6
An experimental comparison of the effects of bacterial colonization on biologic and synthetic meshes.细菌定植对生物和合成网片影响的实验比较
Hernia. 2015 Apr;19(2):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1290-0. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
7
Characterisation of the cellular infiltrate in the foreign body granuloma of textile meshes with its impact on collagen deposition.纺织网异物肉芽肿中细胞浸润的特征及其对胶原蛋白沉积的影响。
Hernia. 2014 Aug;18(4):571-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1220-1. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
8
Bacterial adherence to different meshes used in abdominal surgery.细菌对腹部手术中使用的不同网片的黏附。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Apr;15(2):90-3. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.032. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
9
An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence.一项体外研究评估了网孔形态和缝线固定对细菌黏附的影响。
Hernia. 2013 Dec;17(6):779-89. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1124-5. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
10
'The ideal mesh?'.“理想的网片?”
Pathobiology. 2013;80(4):169-75. doi: 10.1159/000348446. Epub 2013 May 6.