Freund Ophir, Hadad Yitzhac, Shalmon Tamar, Wand Ori, Schneer Sonia, Perluk Tal Moshe, Kleinhendler Eyal, Hershko Tzlil, Tiran Boaz, Aviram Galit, Gershman Evgeni, Adir Yochai, Shitrit David, Bar-Shai Amir, Unterman Avraham
Center of Excellence for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Institute of Pulmonary Medicine, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo 6801298, Israel.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 11;13(14):2335. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142335.
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a heterogeneous interstitial lung disease (ILD) that may be difficult to confidently diagnose. Recently, the 2020 ATS/JRS/ALAT HP diagnostic guidelines were published, yet data validating their performance in real-life settings are scarce. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of the HP guidelines compared to the gold-standard multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). For this purpose, we included consecutive ILD patients that underwent diagnostic bronchoscopy between 2017 and 2020 in three large medical centers. Four diagnostic factors (antigen exposure history, chest computed tomography pattern, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte count, and histology results) were used to assign guidelines-based HP diagnostic confidence levels for each patient. A sensitivity analysis was performed, with MDD diagnosis as the reference standard. Overall, 213 ILD patients were included, 45 (21%) with an MDD diagnosis of HP. The guidelines' moderate (≥70%) confidence threshold produced optimal performance with 73% sensitivity for HP, 89% specificity, and a J-index of 0.62. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for a correct guidelines-based diagnosis was 0.86. The guidelines had better performance for non-fibrotic than fibrotic HP (AUC 0.92 vs. 0.82). All diagnostic factors, except bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocyte count, were independent predictors for MDD diagnosis of HP in a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the HP guidelines exhibited a good diagnostic performance compared to MDD diagnosis in real-life setting.
过敏性肺炎(HP)是一种异质性间质性肺疾病(ILD),可能难以做出确切诊断。最近,2020年美国胸科学会(ATS)/日本呼吸学会(JRS)/拉丁美洲胸科协会(ALAT)的HP诊断指南已发布,但在现实环境中验证其性能的数据却很稀少。我们旨在评估与金标准多学科讨论(MDD)相比,HP指南的诊断性能。为此,我们纳入了2017年至2020年期间在三个大型医疗中心接受诊断性支气管镜检查的连续性ILD患者。使用四个诊断因素(抗原暴露史、胸部计算机断层扫描模式、支气管肺泡灌洗淋巴细胞计数和组织学结果)为每位患者指定基于指南的HP诊断置信水平。以MDD诊断作为参考标准进行了敏感性分析。总体而言,共纳入213例ILD患者,其中45例(21%)经MDD诊断为HP。该指南的中等(≥70%)置信阈值产生了最佳性能,对HP的敏感性为73%,特异性为89%,J指数为0.62。基于指南的正确诊断的受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为0.86。该指南对非纤维化HP的性能优于纤维化HP(AUC分别为0.92和0.82)。在多变量分析中,除支气管肺泡灌洗淋巴细胞计数外,所有诊断因素都是MDD诊断HP的独立预测因素。总之,在现实环境中,与MDD诊断相比,HP指南表现出良好的诊断性能。