From the Department of Cardiopulmonary Imaging (L.C., J.H.C.), Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary & Critical Care (A.A., M.S., C.T.L., R.J., I.U.), and Department of Pathology (A.N.H.), University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637.
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Aug;6(4):e230068. doi: 10.1148/ryct.230068.
Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ATS/JRS/ALAT) versus the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) imaging classifications for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Materials and Methods Patients in the institutional review board-approved Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) registry referred for multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) at the authors' institution (January 1, 2006-April 1, 2021) were included in this retrospective study when ILD was diagnosed at MDD. MDD diagnoses included HP, connective tissue disease-ILD, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Retrospective review of thin-section CT images was performed in consensus by two cardiothoracic radiologists blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnostic patterns were determined for thin-section CT images using both classifications. Discordance rates were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were assessed using MDD diagnosis as the reference standard. Results A total of 297 patients were included in the study: 200 (67%) with HP, 49 (16%) with connective tissue disease-ILD, and 48 (16%) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis at MDD. The discordance rate between the two classifications was 21%. Assuming low HP prevalence (10%), ATS/JRS/ALAT classification outperformed ACCP classification, with greater accuracy (92.3% vs 87.6%) and greater positive predictive value (60.7% vs 42.9%). Assuming high prevalence (50%), accuracy and negative predictive value were superior using ACCP classification (81.7% vs 79.7% and 77.7% vs 72.6%, respectively), and positive predictive value was superior using ATS/JRS/ALAT classification (93.3% vs 87.1%). Conclusion Accuracy of the ATS/JRS/ALAT and ACCP HP classifications was greater in settings with low and high HP prevalence, respectively. Diagnostic performance of both classifications was discordant in a minority of cases. CT, Thorax, Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis, Interstitial Lung Disease © RSNA, 2024.
目的 比较美国胸科学会(ATS)、日本呼吸学会(JRS)和拉丁美洲胸科学会(ALAT)与美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)对过敏性肺炎(HP)的影像学分类的诊断性能。
材料与方法 本回顾性研究纳入了在机构审查委员会批准的间质性肺病(ILD)注册中心就诊并在作者所在机构接受多学科讨论(MDD)的患者,这些患者的ILD 是在 MDD 时诊断的。MDD 诊断包括 HP、结缔组织病-ILD 和特发性肺纤维化。两名心胸放射科医生在不知道诊断的情况下对薄层 CT 图像进行了共识回顾性审查。使用两种分类方法确定了薄层 CT 图像的诊断模式。确定了不一致率。使用 MDD 诊断作为参考标准,评估了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性。
结果 共有 297 例患者纳入本研究:200 例(67%)为 HP,49 例(16%)为结缔组织病-ILD,48 例(16%)为特发性肺纤维化。两种分类之间的不一致率为 21%。假设 HP 患病率较低(10%),ATS/JRS/ALAT 分类的准确性优于 ACCP 分类,准确性更高(92.3%比 87.6%),阳性预测值更高(60.7%比 42.9%)。假设高患病率(50%),使用 ACCP 分类时准确性和阴性预测值更高(分别为 81.7%比 79.7%和 77.7%比 72.6%),使用 ATS/JRS/ALAT 分类时阳性预测值更高(93.3%比 87.1%)。
结论 在 HP 患病率较低和较高的情况下,ATS/JRS/ALAT 和 ACCP HP 分类的准确性更高。两种分类的诊断性能在少数情况下存在不一致。