• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款商用插电式混合动力汽车锂离子电池从摇篮到大门及使用阶段的碳足迹

Cradle-to-Gate and Use-Phase Carbon Footprint of a Commercial Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Battery.

作者信息

Kim Hyung Chul, Lee Sunghoon, Wallington Timothy J

机构信息

Research and Innovation Center, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan 48121, United States.

ESG Impact Team, LG Energy Solution, Seoul 07335, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Aug 15;57(32):11834-11842. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01346. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.3c01346
PMID:37515579
Abstract

Increased use of vehicle electrification to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has led to the need for an accurate and comprehensive assessment of the carbon footprint of traction batteries. Unfortunately, there are few lifecycle assessments (LCAs) of commercial lithium-ion batteries available in the literature, and those that are available focus on the cradle-to-gate stage, often with little or no consideration of the use phase. To address this shortfall, we report both cradle-to-gate and use-phase GHG emissions for the 2020 Model Year Ford Explorer plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) NMC622 battery. Using primary industry data for battery design and manufacturing, cradle-to-gate emissions are estimated to be 1.38 t COe (101 kg COe/kWh), with 78% from materials and parts production and 22% from cell, module, and pack manufacturing. Using mass-induced energy consumptions of 0.6 and 1.6 kWh/(100 km 100 kg) for charge-depleting and -sustaining modes, respectively, the mass-induced use-phase emission of the battery is estimated to be 1.04 t COe. We show that battery emissions during the cradle-to-gate and use phases are comparable and that both phases need to be considered. A holistic and harmonized LCA approach that includes battery use is required to reduce carbon footprint uncertainties and guide future battery designs.

摘要

为减少温室气体(GHG)排放,车辆电气化的使用日益增加,这就需要对牵引电池的碳足迹进行准确而全面的评估。遗憾的是,文献中关于商用锂离子电池的生命周期评估(LCA)很少,且现有的评估主要集中在从摇篮到大门阶段,通常很少或根本不考虑使用阶段。为弥补这一不足,我们报告了2020款福特探险者插电式混合动力汽车(PHEV)NMC622电池从摇篮到大门阶段以及使用阶段的温室气体排放。利用电池设计和制造的第一手行业数据,估计从摇篮到大门阶段的排放量为1.38吨二氧化碳当量(101千克二氧化碳当量/千瓦时),其中78%来自材料和零部件生产,22%来自电芯、模组和电池组制造。分别使用充电耗尽模式和电量维持模式下每百公里每百千克0.6和1.6千瓦时的质量诱导能耗,估计电池的质量诱导使用阶段排放量为1.04吨二氧化碳当量。我们表明,从摇篮到大门阶段和使用阶段的电池排放相当,两个阶段都需要考虑。需要一种包括电池使用的整体且协调一致的生命周期评估方法,以减少碳足迹的不确定性并指导未来的电池设计。

相似文献

1
Cradle-to-Gate and Use-Phase Carbon Footprint of a Commercial Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Battery.一款商用插电式混合动力汽车锂离子电池从摇篮到大门及使用阶段的碳足迹
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Aug 15;57(32):11834-11842. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01346. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
2
Cradle-to-Gate Emissions from a Commercial Electric Vehicle Li-Ion Battery: A Comparative Analysis.从摇篮到大门:商业电动汽车锂离子电池的排放:比较分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 19;50(14):7715-22. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00830. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
3
Impact of recycling on cradle-to-gate energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive lithium-ion batteries.回收对汽车锂离子电池从摇篮到大门的能源消耗和温室气体排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Nov 20;46(22):12704-10. doi: 10.1021/es302420z. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
4
Carbon footprint of hospital laundry: a life-cycle assessment.医院洗衣房的碳足迹:生命周期评估。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 28;14(2):e080838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080838.
5
Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.当前和未来美国轻型车的发展路径:从摇篮到坟墓全生命周期温室气体排放和经济评估。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Feb 20;52(4):2392-2399. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06006. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues.加拿大乳制品的碳足迹:计算与问题。
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Sep;96(9):6091-104. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6563. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
7
Understanding variability in carbon footprint of smallholder dairy farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia.理解埃塞俄比亚中高原小农户奶牛场碳足迹的变异性。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Dec 2;54(6):411. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03379-1.
8
Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.中国苏州市采用新能源汽车的温室气体排放效益:一项案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(50):76286-76297. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21284-w. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
9
Carbon footprint of South Dakota dairy production system and assessment of mitigation options.南达科他州奶牛养殖系统的碳足迹及减排方案评估
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 30;18(3):e0269076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269076. eCollection 2023.
10
Carbon footprint as an environmental sustainability indicator for the particleboard produced in Pakistan.用碳足迹作为巴基斯坦刨花板生产的环境可持续性指标。
Environ Res. 2017 May;155:385-393. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbon footprint analysis and emission reduction pathways of Bogie frame manufacturing process in Urban Rail Transportation.城市轨道交通转向架制造过程的碳足迹分析与减排途径
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11539. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83407-2.
2
Life cycle assessment of a LiFePO cylindrical battery.LiFePO₄圆柱形电池的生命周期评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Oct;31(46):57242-57258. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32543-3. Epub 2024 Mar 1.