Suppr超能文献

死亡降临到我们所有人身上:将与运动相结合的栖息地选择和社会行为与灰狼中与人类相关及疾病相关的死亡率联系起来。

Death comes for us all: relating movement-integrated habitat selection and social behavior to human-associated and disease-related mortality among gray wolves.

作者信息

Turner Julie W, Prokopenko Christina M, Kingdon Katrien A, Dupont Daniel L J, Zabihi-Seissan Sana, Vander Wal Eric

机构信息

Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 45 Arctic Ave., St. John's, NL, A1B 3X9, Canada.

Département des sciences expérimentales, Université de Saint-Boniface, 200 ave de la Cathédrale, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 0H7, Canada.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2023 Aug;202(4):685-697. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05426-6. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

Abstract

Avoiding death affects biological processes, including behavior. Habitat selection, movement, and sociality are highly flexible behaviors that influence the mortality risks and subsequent fitness of individuals. In the Anthropocene, animals are experiencing increased risks from direct human causes and increased spread of infectious diseases. Using integrated step selection analysis, we tested how the habitat selection, movement, and social behaviors of gray wolves vary in the two months prior to death due to humans (being shot or trapped) or canine distemper virus (CDV). We further tested how those behaviors vary as a prelude to death. We studied populations of wolves that occurred under two different management schemes: a national park managed for conservation and a provincially managed multi-use area. Behaviors that changed prior to death were strongly related to how an animal eventually died. Wolves killed by humans moved slower than wolves that survived and selected to be nearer roads closer in time to their death. Wolves that died due to CDV moved progressively slower as they neared death and reduced their avoidance of wet habitats. All animals, regardless of dying or living, maintained selection to be near packmates across time, which seemingly contributed to disease dynamics in the packs infected with CDV. There were no noticeable differences in behavior between the two management areas. Overall, habitat selection, movement, and sociality interact to put individuals and groups at greater risks, influencing their cause-specific mortality.

摘要

避免死亡会影响包括行为在内的生物过程。栖息地选择、移动和社交是高度灵活的行为,会影响个体的死亡风险及后续的适应性。在人类世,动物正面临着来自人类直接活动的更多风险以及传染病传播的加剧。我们使用综合步长选择分析,测试了灰狼在因人类因素(被射杀或诱捕)或犬瘟热病毒(CDV)死亡前两个月的栖息地选择、移动和社交行为是如何变化的。我们进一步测试了这些行为在死亡前奏阶段是如何变化的。我们研究了在两种不同管理模式下出现的狼群:一个以保护为目的管理的国家公园和一个省级管理的多用途区域。死亡前发生变化的行为与动物最终的死亡方式密切相关。被人类杀死的狼比存活下来的狼移动得更慢,并且在接近死亡时选择更靠近道路栖息。因CDV死亡的狼在接近死亡时移动得越来越慢,并减少了对潮湿栖息地的回避。所有动物,无论生死,都始终选择与同伴靠近,这似乎对感染CDV的狼群中的疾病动态产生了影响。两个管理区域之间的行为没有明显差异。总体而言,栖息地选择、移动和社交相互作用,使个体和群体面临更大风险,影响它们特定原因的死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验