Bisgaard M, Falsen E
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1986 Aug;94(4):215-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03044.x.
Incorrect diagnosis of species belonging to the family Pasteurellaceae Pohl 1981 is often due to inadequate laboratory identification techniques. Reinvestigations of 56 human isolates of Pasteurellaceae and comparison of the results obtained with those obtained from nine reference strains in 65 different tests allowed classification of 26 strains as P. multocida ssp. multocida, 11 strains as P. multocida ssp. septica, 12 strains as P. canis, 4 strains as P. dagmatis and 1 strain as P. stomatitis. Two strains were tentatively classified with P. haemolytica biogroup 2(T) and the SP-group, respectively. The present investigation also showed that the type strains of P. gallinarum and Haemophilus aphrophilus were phenotypically related. Members of the family Pasteurellacea Pohl 1981 should be considered as potential etiologic agents of any local infection following animal bites or scratches.
对属于波氏巴斯德菌科（Pasteurellaceae Pohl 1981）的菌种进行错误诊断，往往是由于实验室鉴定技术不足。对56株人源巴斯德菌科分离株进行重新研究，并在65项不同检测中将所得结果与9株参考菌株的结果进行比较，从而将26株菌株分类为多杀巴斯德菌多杀亚种（P. multocida ssp. multocida），11株为多杀巴斯德菌败血亚种（P. multocida ssp. septica），12株为犬巴斯德菌（P. canis），4株为龈巴斯德菌（P. dagmatis），1株为口炎巴斯德菌（P. stomatitis）。两株菌株分别暂归类于溶血巴斯德菌生物群2（T）和SP组。本研究还表明，鸡巴斯德菌（P. gallinarum）和嗜沫嗜血杆菌（Haemophilus aphrophilus）的模式菌株在表型上相关。1981年的波氏巴斯德菌科成员应被视为动物咬伤或抓伤后任何局部感染的潜在病原体。
