• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久起搏器植入预测模型。

A prediction model for permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 29;28(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01237-w.

DOI:10.1186/s40001-023-01237-w
PMID:37516891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10387194/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to develop a post-procedural risk prediction model for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

METHODS

336 patients undergoing TAVR at a single institution were included for model derivation. For primary analysis, multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate predictors and a risk score system was devised based on the prediction model. For secondary analysis, a Cox proportion hazard model was performed to assess characteristics associated with the time from TAVR to PPMI. The model was validated internally via bootstrap and externally using an independent cohort.

RESULTS

48 (14.3%) patients in the derivation set had PPMI after TAVR. Prior right bundle branch block (RBBB, OR: 10.46; p < 0.001), pre-procedural aortic valve area (AVA, OR: 1.41; p = 0.004) and post- to pre-procedural AVA ratio (OR: 1.72; p = 0.043) were identified as independent predictors for PPMI. AUC was 0.7 and 0.71 in the derivation and external validation set. Prior RBBB (HR: 5.07; p < 0.001), pre-procedural AVA (HR: 1.33; p = 0.001), post-procedural AVA to prosthetic nominal area ratio (HR: 0.02; p = 0.039) and post- to pre-procedural troponin-T difference (HR: 1.72; p = 0.017) are independently associated with time to PPMI.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-procedural prediction model achieved high discriminative power and accuracy for PPMI. The risk score system was constructed and validated, providing an accessible tool in clinical setting regarding the Chinese population.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在为行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)治疗的患者开发一种用于永久性心脏起搏器植入(PPMI)的术后风险预测模型。

方法

在单个机构中,对 336 例接受 TAVR 的患者进行了模型推导。对于主要分析,使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估预测因子,并根据预测模型设计风险评分系统。对于次要分析,进行了 Cox 比例风险模型以评估与 TAVR 至 PPMI 时间相关的特征。该模型通过自举法进行内部验证,并使用独立队列进行外部验证。

结果

在推导组中,有 48 例(14.3%)患者在 TAVR 后发生 PPMI。术前右束支阻滞(RBBB,OR:10.46;p<0.001)、术前主动脉瓣面积(AVA,OR:1.41;p=0.004)和术后至术前 AVA 比值(OR:1.72;p=0.043)被确定为 PPMI 的独立预测因子。AUC 在推导组和外部验证组中分别为 0.7 和 0.71。术前 RBBB(HR:5.07;p<0.001)、术前 AVA(HR:1.33;p=0.001)、术后 AVA 至人工瓣标称面积比值(HR:0.02;p=0.039)和术后至术前肌钙蛋白 T 差值(HR:1.72;p=0.017)与 PPMI 的时间独立相关。

结论

术后预测模型对 PPMI 具有较高的区分能力和准确性。构建并验证了风险评分系统,为中国人群提供了一种在临床环境中易于使用的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/9688591c550a/40001_2023_1237_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/a11a05afdfcf/40001_2023_1237_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/75eafaba415f/40001_2023_1237_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/14ad9e2e9087/40001_2023_1237_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/6e9dd2e91172/40001_2023_1237_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/9688591c550a/40001_2023_1237_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/a11a05afdfcf/40001_2023_1237_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/75eafaba415f/40001_2023_1237_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/14ad9e2e9087/40001_2023_1237_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/6e9dd2e91172/40001_2023_1237_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3da2/10387194/9688591c550a/40001_2023_1237_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A prediction model for permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久起搏器植入预测模型。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 29;28(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01237-w.
2
A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后植入起搏器的高预测风险模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
3
Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后植入永久起搏器的预测因素:SAPIEN 3 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2200-2209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.034.
4
Conduction Abnormalities and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Repositionable LOTUS Device: The United Kingdom Experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用可重定位 LOTUS 装置后的传导异常和永久性起搏器植入:英国经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.044.
5
Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Observation of a Chinese Population.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者永久性起搏器植入的发生率及预测因素:中国人群观察
Cardiology. 2020;145(1):27-34. doi: 10.1159/000502792. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Predictors of right ventricular pacing and pacemaker dependence in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者右心室起搏及起搏器依赖的预测因素
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;51(1):77-86. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0303-1. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
Timing and evolution of advanced conduction disturbances in patients with right bundle branch block undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后右束支传导阻滞患者的高级传导障碍的时间和演变。
Europace. 2020 Oct 1;22(10):1537-1546. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa149.
8
Mean compression ratio of a self-expandable valve is associated with the need for pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.自膨式瓣膜的平均压缩比与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后需要植入起搏器有关。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 29;29(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01070-1.
9
Minimizing Permanent Pacemaker Following Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.最大限度减少可重定位自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器的使用。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1796-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.056. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
Optimizing Care of Patients With Right Bundle Branch Block Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.优化行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的右束支传导阻滞患者的护理。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Sep;42:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors, clinical impact, and management strategies for conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导异常的预测因素、临床影响及管理策略:最新综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 8;11:1370244. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1370244. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Late-onset atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后迟发性房室传导阻滞
Heart Rhythm O2. 2021 Nov 5;2(6Part A):607-613. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.11.001. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Clinical implications of troponin-T elevations following TAVR: Troponin Increase Following TAVR.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后肌钙蛋白 T 升高的临床意义:TAVR 后肌钙蛋白升高。
J Cardiol. 2022 Feb;79(2):240-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.08.030. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
3
Validation of the 2019 Expert Consensus Algorithm for the Management of Conduction Disturbances After TAVR.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后传导障碍管理 2019 专家共识算法验证。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 10;14(9):981-991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.010.
4
Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入预测的机器学习算法
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;14(3):e008941. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008941. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Permanent Pacemaker Requirement After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久起搏器需求的发生率、预测因素及其影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 25;14(2):115-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.063.
6
Machine learning method for predicting pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测起搏器植入的机器学习方法。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):334-340. doi: 10.1111/pace.14163. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
7
2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Conduction Disturbances in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.2020 年美国心脏病学会专家共识决策路径:经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者传导障碍管理——美国心脏病学会解决方案监督委员会报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 17;76(20):2391-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
8
Validation of scoring system predicting permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测永久性起搏器植入的评分系统的验证。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 May;43(5):479-485. doi: 10.1111/pace.13910. Epub 2020 May 2.
9
Prevalence of permanent pacemaker implantation after conventional aortic valve replacement-a propensity-matched analysis in patients with a bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve: a benchmark for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.传统主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入的发生率——双叶或三叶主动脉瓣患者的倾向匹配分析:经导管主动脉瓣置换的一个基准
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jul 1;58(1):130-137. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa053.
10
Risk Prediction Model for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心脏植入式电子装置植入的风险预测模型
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Mar;6(3):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.10.020. Epub 2020 Jan 29.