The Christ Hospital Health Network and The Lindner Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
The Sue and Bill Butler Research Fellow, The Linder Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):334-340. doi: 10.1111/pace.14163. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
An accurate assessment of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) risk following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is important for clinical decision making. The aims of this study were to investigate the significance and utility of pre- and post-TAVR ECG data and compare machine learning approaches with traditional logistic regression in predicting pacemaker risk following TAVR.
Five hundred fifity seven patients in sinus rhythm undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis (AS) were included in the analysis. Baseline demographics, clinical, pre-TAVR ECG, post-TAVR data, post-TAVR ECGs (24 h following TAVR and before PPI), and echocardiographic data were recorded. A Random Forest (RF) algorithm and logistic regression were used to train models for assessing the likelihood of PPI following TAVR.
Average age was 80 ± 9 years, with 52% male. PPI after TAVR occurred in 95 patients (17.1%). The optimal cutoff of delta PR (difference between post and pre TAVR PR intervals) to predict PPI was 20 ms with a sensitivity of 0.82, a specificity of 0.66. With regard to delta QRS, the optimal cutoff was 13 ms with a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.59. The RF model that incorporated post-TAVR ECG data (AUC 0.81) more accurately predicted PPI risk compared to the RF model without post-TAVR ECG data (AUC 0.72). Moreover, the RF model performed better than logistic regression model in predicting PPI risk (AUC: 0.81 vs. 0.69).
Machine learning using RF methodology is significantly more powerful than traditional logistic regression in predicting PPI risk following TAVR.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后准确评估永久起搏器植入(PPI)风险对于临床决策至关重要。本研究旨在探讨术前和术后 TAVR 心电图数据的意义和实用性,并比较机器学习方法与传统逻辑回归在预测 TAVR 后起搏器风险方面的应用。
共纳入 557 例窦性节律行 TAVR 治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的患者。记录基线人口统计学、临床、术前 TAVR 心电图、术后 TAVR 数据、术后 TAVR 心电图(TAVR 后 24 小时和 PPI 前)和超声心动图数据。使用随机森林(RF)算法和逻辑回归对评估 TAVR 后 PPI 发生可能性的模型进行训练。
平均年龄为 80 ± 9 岁,52%为男性。TAVR 后发生 PPI 的患者有 95 例(17.1%)。预测 PPI 的最佳 delta PR(术后和术前 PR 间期差值)截断值为 20 ms,敏感性为 0.82,特异性为 0.66。至于 delta QRS,最佳截断值为 13 ms,敏感性为 0.68,特异性为 0.59。与不包含术后 TAVR 心电图数据的 RF 模型(AUC 0.72)相比,纳入术后 TAVR 心电图数据的 RF 模型(AUC 0.81)更能准确预测 PPI 风险。此外,RF 模型在预测 PPI 风险方面优于逻辑回归模型(AUC:0.81 vs. 0.69)。
使用 RF 方法的机器学习在预测 TAVR 后 PPI 风险方面明显比传统逻辑回归更强大。