• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带刺缝线与标准缝线对全膝关节置换术后伤口并发症的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Effect of barbed versus standard sutures on wound complications in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shengzhou People's Hospital (the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Shengzhou Branch), Shengzhou, P.R. China.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4130-4137. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14307. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.14307
PMID:37519132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10681399/
Abstract

A barbed suture has been demonstrated to be effective in shortening the stitching time and improving the aesthetic appearance of the stitches during the entire knee replacement. However, no meta-analyses have been conducted specifically to evaluate the effect of the barbed thread on wound complications relative to the conventional suture. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database, the Embase database, the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science was performed to obtain search data up to June 2023, and only randomised controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. We used Review Manager 5.3 for data synthesis and analysis. This meta-analysis included eight studies. It was found that the use of barbed sutures did not improve the incidence of the disease, the infection of the wound, the closure of the abscess and the injury. However, because of the limited sample size of the randomised controlled trials for this meta-analysis, the data should be handled with caution. More high-quality, large-sample studies will be required to confirm the results.

摘要

一种带倒刺的缝线已被证明在整个膝关节置换术中有效缩短缝合时间并改善缝线的美观度。然而,尚未有专门的荟萃分析来评估带倒刺缝线相对于传统缝线对伤口并发症的影响。我们对 PubMed 数据库、Embase 数据库、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 进行了全面检索,以获取截至 2023 年 6 月的检索数据,并且仅纳入了这项荟萃分析的随机对照试验。我们使用 Review Manager 5.3 进行数据合成和分析。这项荟萃分析纳入了八项研究。结果发现,使用带倒刺的缝线并没有改善疾病的发生率、伤口感染、脓肿闭合和损伤的情况。然而,由于这项荟萃分析的随机对照试验的样本量有限,应谨慎处理这些数据。需要更多高质量、大样本的研究来证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/4c2ea4524d45/IWJ-20-4130-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/a9f027432ded/IWJ-20-4130-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/25ca6f47d63e/IWJ-20-4130-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/05d3a57b207f/IWJ-20-4130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/080c4dc6b7ed/IWJ-20-4130-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/ffef1c00e188/IWJ-20-4130-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/7cb6cfff8954/IWJ-20-4130-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/70a099c2cfb6/IWJ-20-4130-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/1eddad4432ba/IWJ-20-4130-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/50198dc81c91/IWJ-20-4130-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/4c2ea4524d45/IWJ-20-4130-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/a9f027432ded/IWJ-20-4130-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/25ca6f47d63e/IWJ-20-4130-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/05d3a57b207f/IWJ-20-4130-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/080c4dc6b7ed/IWJ-20-4130-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/ffef1c00e188/IWJ-20-4130-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/7cb6cfff8954/IWJ-20-4130-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/70a099c2cfb6/IWJ-20-4130-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/1eddad4432ba/IWJ-20-4130-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/50198dc81c91/IWJ-20-4130-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc1/10681399/4c2ea4524d45/IWJ-20-4130-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of barbed versus standard sutures on wound complications in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.带刺缝线与标准缝线对全膝关节置换术后伤口并发症的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4130-4137. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14307. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Barbed Sutures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.带倒刺缝线在全膝关节置换术中的应用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Knee Surg. 2021 Dec;34(14):1516-1526. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710373. Epub 2020 May 27.
3
Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.全膝关节置换术伤口闭合中使用免打结倒刺缝线有优势吗?双侧同期全膝关节置换术的随机试验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2019-27. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4157-5. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
4
[Efficacy and safety of barbed sutures in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis].倒刺缝线在全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术中的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 13;99(30):2375-2382. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.30.010.
5
Barbed versus standard sutures in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术中倒刺缝线与标准缝线的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Aug;25(6):1105-10. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1644-z. Epub 2015 May 15.
6
A better strategy using barbed sutures for wound closure in total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术中使用带倒刺缝线进行伤口缝合的更好策略。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jul;8(10):799-814. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0019. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A meta-analysis.全髋关节和膝关节置换术中的倒刺缝线:证据是什么?一项荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2016 Feb;40(2):225-31. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3049-3. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Does Barbed Suture Lower Cost and Improve Outcome in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Controlled Trial.倒刺缝线在全膝关节置换术中是否能降低成本并改善预后?一项随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1474-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
9
Barbed Sutures for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Have Shorter Wound Closure Time and are Cost-Effective in Comparison to Traditional Sutures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials.与传统缝线相比,倒刺缝线用于全髋关节和膝关节置换术时伤口闭合时间更短且具有成本效益:一项对16项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Apr 26;56(7):1156-1173. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00638-z. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Barbed sutures reduce arthrotomy closure duration compared to interrupted conventional sutures for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.在全膝关节置换术中,与间断常规缝线相比,倒刺缝线可缩短关节切开术闭合时间:一项随机对照试验。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Dec;105(3):275-281. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00654-y. Epub 2020 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
RETRACTION: Effect of Barbed versus Standard Sutures on Wound Complications in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.撤稿声明:倒刺缝线与标准缝线对全膝关节置换术伤口并发症的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70508. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70508.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Barbed Sutures Compared to Non-barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.在减重手术中使用带刺缝线与非带刺缝线的安全性和有效性比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3324-3334. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07382-3. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
[Translated article] Wound closure after knee and hip replacement (TKA and THA): Survey results on the clinical practice in Spain.[翻译文章] 膝关节和髋关节置换术后(全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术)的伤口闭合:西班牙临床实践的调查结果。
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2024 Mar-Apr;68(2):T97-T107. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2023.11.005. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
2
Goals, challenges and strategies for wound and bleeding management in total knee arthroplasty: A modified Delphi method.全膝关节置换术中伤口和出血管理的目标、挑战和策略:改良 Delphi 法。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022 Sep-Dec;30(3):10225536221138985. doi: 10.1177/10225536221138985.
3
Barbed Sutures for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Have Shorter Wound Closure Time and are Cost-Effective in Comparison to Traditional Sutures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials.
与传统缝线相比,倒刺缝线用于全髋关节和膝关节置换术时伤口闭合时间更短且具有成本效益:一项对16项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Apr 26;56(7):1156-1173. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00638-z. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Surgical site infection after wound closure with staples versus sutures in elective knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.择期膝关节和髋关节置换术中使用吻合钉与缝线闭合伤口后的手术部位感染:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroplasty. 2022 Mar 4;4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00110-7.
5
Surgical therapy in osteoarthritis.骨关节炎的手术治疗。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Aug;30(8):1019-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
A symmetric anchor designed barbed suture versus conventional interrupted sutures in total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial.对称锚定设计的倒刺缝线与全膝关节置换术中传统间断缝线的比较:一项多中心、随机对照试验。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Sep-Dec;28(3):2309499020965681. doi: 10.1177/2309499020965681.
7
Are There Lower Complication Rates with Bidirectional Barbed Suture in Total Knee Arthroplasty Incision Closure? A Randomized Clinical Trial.全膝关节置换术切口闭合中使用双向倒刺缝线并发症发生率是否更低?一项随机临床试验。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Aug 5;26:e922783. doi: 10.12659/MSM.922783.
8
Barbed sutures reduce arthrotomy closure duration and suture utilisation compared to interrupted conventional sutures for primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial.与间断传统缝线相比,带刺缝线可减少初次全髋关节置换术关节切开闭合时间和缝线使用量:一项随机对照试验。
Hip Int. 2021 Sep;31(5):582-588. doi: 10.1177/1120700020911891. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Barbed sutures reduce arthrotomy closure duration compared to interrupted conventional sutures for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.在全膝关节置换术中,与间断常规缝线相比,倒刺缝线可缩短关节切开术闭合时间:一项随机对照试验。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Dec;105(3):275-281. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00654-y. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
10
Enhanced recovery following hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness evidence.髋关节和膝关节置换术后的快速康复:成本效益证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):e032204. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032204.