Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity, Department of Physiotherapy, Nursing and Health Sceinces, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Sep;58(5):3315-3329. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16090. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
Deficits in postural stability in response to environmental challenges are seen in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients with high fear of pain (HFP). Hence, it is essential to follow effective approaches to treat postural stability deficits and improve the health status of these patients. The current study aimed to compare the effects of cathodal and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS and a-tDCS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on postural stability in non-specific CLBP patients with HFP. In this randomized clinical trial study, 75 patients were randomly assigned to left DLPFC a-tDCS, left DLPFC c-tDCS and sham stimulation groups (n = 25 in each group). All groups received a single-session 2 mA tDCS for 20 min, but the stimulation was slowly turned off after 30 s in the sham group. Before, immediately, 24 h and 1 week after the interventions, postural stability indices were assessed using a Biodex Balance System. A significant reduction in most indices was shown in both a-tDCS and c-tDCS groups after interventions (immediately, 24 h and 1 week follow-up) during static and dynamic postural tasks compared with the sham tDCS group (p < .01). In addition, some tests showed a significant difference between a-tDCS and c-tDCS (p < .05). The findings indicated positive effects of both a-tDCS and c-tDCS on the left DLPFC, with more efficacy of a-tDCS on postural stability in LBP patients with HFP.
在有高疼痛恐惧(HFP)的慢性下背痛(CLBP)患者中,对环境挑战的姿势稳定性会出现缺陷。因此,必须采用有效的方法来治疗姿势稳定性缺陷,并改善这些患者的健康状况。本研究旨在比较经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)左背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)对有 HFP 的非特异性 CLBP 患者的姿势稳定性的影响。在这项随机临床试验研究中,75 名患者被随机分配到左 DLPFC 阳极 tDCS、左 DLPFC 阴极 tDCS 和假刺激组(每组 25 名)。所有组均接受 20 分钟 2 mA 的单次 tDCS,但在假刺激组中,刺激在 30 秒后缓慢关闭。在干预前、干预后即刻、24 小时和 1 周时,使用 Biodex 平衡系统评估姿势稳定性指标。与假 tDCS 组相比,在静态和动态姿势任务中,a-tDCS 和 c-tDCS 组在干预后(即刻、24 小时和 1 周随访)大多数指标均显著降低(p <.01)。此外,一些测试显示 a-tDCS 和 c-tDCS 之间存在显著差异(p <.05)。这些发现表明,a-tDCS 和 c-tDCS 对左 DLPFC 均有积极影响,且 a-tDCS 对有 HFP 的 LBP 患者的姿势稳定性更有效。