• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

彩色主题人机界面(HMI)对自动驾驶汽车中信任度和接管性能的影响。

The influence of a color themed HMI on trust and take-over performance in automated vehicles.

作者信息

El Jouhri Aboubakr, El Sharkawy Ashraf, Paksoy Hakan, Youssif Omar, He Xiaolin, Kim Soyeon, Happee Riender

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Robotics, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

Department of Human Centered Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 13;14:1128285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128285. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128285
PMID:37519355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10382069/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

SAE Level 3 is known as conditional driving automation. As long as certain conditions are met, there is no need to supervise the technology and the driver can engage in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs). However, a human driver must be present and alert to take over when the automation is facing its system limits. When such an emergency takes place, the automation uses the human machine interface (HMI) to send a take-over request (TOR) to the driver.

METHODS

We investigated the influence of a color themed HMI on the trust and take-over performance in automated vehicles. Using a driving simulator, we tested 45 participants divided in three groups with a baseline auditory HMI and two advanced color themed HMIs consisting of a display and ambient lighting with the colors red and blue. Trust in automation was assessed using questionnaires while take-over performance was assessed through response time and success rate.

RESULTS

Compared to the baseline HMI, the color themed HMI is more trustworthy, and participants understood their driving tasks better. Results show that the color themed HMI is perceived as more pleasant compared to the baseline HMI and leads to shorter reaction times. Red ambient lighting is seen as more urging than blue, but HMI color did not significantly affect the general HMI perception and TOR performance.

DISCUSSION

Further research can explore the use of color and other modalities to express varying urgency levels and validate findings in complex on road driving conditions.

摘要

引言

SAE 3级被称为有条件驾驶自动化。只要满足某些条件,就无需对该技术进行监督,驾驶员可以从事与驾驶无关的任务(NDRT)。然而,必须有一名人类驾驶员在场并保持警觉,以便在自动化系统达到其极限时接管。当发生此类紧急情况时,自动化系统会使用人机界面(HMI)向驾驶员发送接管请求(TOR)。

方法

我们研究了以颜色为主题的人机界面对自动驾驶车辆中的信任度和接管性能的影响。我们使用驾驶模拟器对45名参与者进行了测试,他们被分为三组,分别使用基线听觉人机界面以及两种先进的以颜色为主题的人机界面,后者包括带有红色和蓝色的显示屏和环境照明。通过问卷评估对自动化的信任度,同时通过反应时间和成功率评估接管性能。

结果

与基线人机界面相比,以颜色为主题的人机界面更值得信赖,参与者对其驾驶任务的理解也更好。结果表明,与基线人机界面相比,以颜色为主题的人机界面被认为更令人愉悦,并且反应时间更短。红色环境照明比蓝色更具紧迫感,但人机界面的颜色对总体人机界面感知和接管请求性能没有显著影响。

讨论

进一步的研究可以探索使用颜色和其他方式来表达不同的紧急程度,并在复杂的道路驾驶条件下验证研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/719c8060d23e/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/1fe846232a31/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/4c465ef856bb/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/cf511dabf7ae/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/3c8a3a186447/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/615b9ac82a0e/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/65ae5b04c35c/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/771c6fba7843/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/719c8060d23e/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/1fe846232a31/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/4c465ef856bb/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/cf511dabf7ae/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/3c8a3a186447/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/615b9ac82a0e/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/65ae5b04c35c/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/771c6fba7843/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70f4/10382069/719c8060d23e/fpsyg-14-1128285-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of a color themed HMI on trust and take-over performance in automated vehicles.彩色主题人机界面(HMI)对自动驾驶汽车中信任度和接管性能的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 13;14:1128285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128285. eCollection 2023.
2
Get Ready for Take-Overs: Using Head-Up Display for Drivers to Engage in Non-Driving-Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles.为接管做好准备:利用平视显示器让驾驶员在自动驾驶车辆中从事非驾驶相关任务。
Hum Factors. 2023 Dec;65(8):1759-1775. doi: 10.1177/00187208211056200. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
3
Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.通过显示轨迹指针来改善自动驾驶中驾驶员的主动干预——驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S152-S156. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1610170.
4
A user study of directional tactile and auditory user interfaces for take-over requests in conditionally automated vehicles.条件自动化车辆接管请求的定向触觉和听觉用户界面的用户研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Sep;174:106766. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106766. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Evaluation of Imminent Take-Over Requests With Real Automation on a Test Track.在测试轨道上使用实际自动化对即将到来的接管请求进行评估。
Hum Factors. 2023 Dec;65(8):1776-1792. doi: 10.1177/00187208211051435. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
6
From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.从部分自动化到高度自动化再到手动驾驶:非驾驶相关任务、困意与接管性能之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
7
Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation.条件自动化中不同听觉输出的接管请求对驾驶员的遵从性
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Dec;109:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
8
Driver behaviors assisted by different human machine interfaces to avoid rear-end collisions during level 2 automated driving.不同人机界面辅助下的驾驶员行为,以避免 2 级自动驾驶时的追尾碰撞。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(6):475-481. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2222326. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
9
The influence of experienced severe road traffic accidents on take-over reactions and non-driving-related tasks in an automated driving simulator study.在自动驾驶模拟器研究中,经历过严重道路交通事故对接管反应和与驾驶无关任务的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Nov;162:106408. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106408. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
10
Effects of non-driving related tasks on readiness to take over control in conditionally automated driving.非驾驶相关任务对有条件自动驾驶中接管控制权准备状态的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(8):629-633. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1969373. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Collaboration Does Not Shape the Effects Caused by Self-Encoding: Evidence From Ongoing and Enduring Collaboration.社会协作不会塑造自我编码所产生的影响:来自持续协作和持久协作的证据。
Psych J. 2025 Jun;14(3):357-376. doi: 10.1002/pchj.70006. Epub 2025 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.感知到的安全和对 SAE 级别 2 部分自动化汽车的信任:来自在线问卷的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0260953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260953. eCollection 2021.
2
Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.在三级有条件自动化车辆中建模接管性能。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul;116:3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
3
Take-over performance in evasive manoeuvres.规避动作中的接管性能。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:211-222. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
4
Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars.对智能系统的信任:分享驾驶目标和提供信息,以提高智能系统在汽车中的可信度和可接受性。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):799-810. doi: 10.1177/0018720812443825.
5
Color and psychological functioning: the effect of red on performance attainment.颜色与心理功能:红色对绩效达成的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Feb;136(1):154-68. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.154.
6
Psychology: red enhances human performance in contests.心理学:红色可提高人类在竞赛中的表现。
Nature. 2005 May 19;435(7040):293. doi: 10.1038/435293a.
7
Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.对自动化的信任:设计适度的依赖。
Hum Factors. 2004 Spring;46(1):50-80. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.