Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情时代及之后已故学者社交网站的命运

On the fate of social networking sites of deceased academics in the Covid-19 era and beyond.

作者信息

Teixeira da Silva Jaime A

机构信息

Independent researcher, P. O. Box 7, Miki-cho post office, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken 761-0799, Japan.

出版信息

Curr Res Behav Sci. 2020 Nov;1:100007. doi: 10.1016/j.crbeha.2020.100007. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has brought about unprecedented death, and among those touched by this virus are academics who have, at some point in their career, lost their lives, or academic institutes or countries who have lost valuable intellectual contributors. In the shadows of their deaths, it is incumbent upon us - as members of academia and the public - to somberly reflect on the realities of living close to, or alongside, death. One aspect that has not been widely discussed, but that seems to be more pertinent now than ever, is the fate of social media accounts, institutional websites, social networking sites, and other publicly available sites of deceased academics. A deceased academic continues to have responsibilities beyond their death because their work and legendary status may be posthumously challenged at any point in the future. Faced with challenges, absent an active voice that might be able to offer a suitable response, and considering the "fallible" nature of science, that legendary status and literature could change, for example, via the postmortem correction or retraction of their academic papers. While many academics have likely not reflected too deeply - or at all - on this issue, they would do well to ponder on this topic now, especially in these unprecedented times of Covid-19.

摘要

新冠疫情已造成了前所未有的死亡,受这种病毒影响的人群中包括一些学者,他们在职业生涯的某个阶段失去了生命,或是一些学术机构或国家失去了宝贵的知识贡献者。在他们死亡的阴影下,作为学术界和公众的一员,我们有责任严肃地反思与死亡近距离接触或相伴而生的现实。有一个方面尚未得到广泛讨论,但现在似乎比以往任何时候都更相关,那就是已故学者的社交媒体账号、机构网站、社交网络平台以及其他公开可用网站的命运。一位已故学者在去世后仍负有责任,因为他们的作品和传奇地位可能在未来的任何时候受到死后的质疑。面对挑战,由于缺乏一个可能能够给出合适回应的活跃声音,并且考虑到科学的“易错”性质,那种传奇地位和文献可能会改变,例如,通过对他们学术论文的事后修正或撤回。虽然许多学者可能没有对这个问题进行过太深入的思考——甚至根本没有思考过——但他们现在最好思考一下这个话题,尤其是在新冠疫情这个前所未有的时期。

相似文献

2
4
Work-Nonwork boundaries in academia: A problematizing review.学术界的工作与非工作界限:一项问题化综述。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Feb 5;4:245. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18573.2. eCollection 2024.
5
The power of networking in science and academia.科学和学术界的网络力量。
Immunol Cell Biol. 2024 Nov;102(10):871-877. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12832. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
6
Online Academics in Pakistan: COVID-19 and Beyond.巴基斯坦的在线学术:新冠疫情及之后
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jan-Feb;37(1):283-287. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.1.2894.
9
The high scholarly value of grey literature before and during Covid-19.新冠疫情之前及期间灰色文献的高学术价值。
Scientometrics. 2022;127(6):3489-3504. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04398-3. Epub 2022 May 21.

本文引用的文献

3
Anti-science extremism in America: escalating and globalizing.美国的反科学极端主义:愈演愈烈且全球化。
Microbes Infect. 2020 Nov-Dec;22(10):505-507. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
5
Psychological and social impact of COVID-19.COVID-19 的心理和社会影响。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Jul;12(5):468-469. doi: 10.1037/tra0000656. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
Psychosocial impact of COVID-19.新冠疫情的社会心理影响
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):779-788. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 May 27.
8
Social Capital in the Response to COVID-19.应对新冠疫情中的社会资本。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Nov;34(8):942-944. doi: 10.1177/0890117120924531. Epub 2020 May 12.
9
Should the deceased be listed as authors?逝者是否应该被列为作者?
J Med Ethics. 2019 May;45(5):331-338. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105304. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Integration in emerging social networks explains academic failure and success.新兴社交网络中的整合解释了学术的失败与成功。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 15;116(3):792-797. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811388115. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验