• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用层次分析法解决供应商选择问题。

Addressing the supplier selection problem by using the analytical hierarchy process.

作者信息

Manik Mehedi Hasan

机构信息

Marketing Insights, Advanced Chemical Industries (ACI) Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jul 11;9(7):e17997. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17997. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17997
PMID:37519742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10372370/
Abstract

ACI Pharma spends $ 12 to 15 million yearly to promote its brands. The brand promotional activities of the company were hampered, due to supplier selection subjectively, which impacted market share. The study selects the best supplier with supplier management and purchasing policy for printing materials for ACI Pharma based on objective judgments. The required data has been collected from the company. This study uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to address supplier selection and management problems. Five attributes, cost, quality, delivery, flexibility, and communication, and ten suppliers have been evaluated to select the best supplier. Spark Printers is the best supplier for ACI Pharma as it obtains the highest score, 0.968, whereas Marvelous Printers Limited and Lutfur Enterprise are the second-best and third-best suppliers. The application of AHP in the pharmaceutical supply chain industry is very limited. Further, Previous studies emphasized supplier selection rather than management and purchasing policy. Moreover, industry practitioners, especially in developing countries, might not use complex methodologies due to time, money, or technical constraints. Considering these thoughts, this study is conducted to select and manage the right supplier with purchasing policy using AHP in industry-friendly language and analysis patterns. Other organizations suffering from similar problems, such as ACI Pharma, may benefit from this research. The study has selected AHP, purposively, without any methodological justifications, although many Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques are present. Further studies might be conducted to find which MCDM method fits best to address the supplier selection problem in the pharmaceutical supply chain industry.

摘要

ACI制药公司每年花费1200万至1500万美元来推广其品牌。由于供应商选择主观,该公司的品牌推广活动受到阻碍,进而影响了市场份额。本研究基于客观判断,为ACI制药公司选择了具有供应商管理和印刷材料采购政策的最佳供应商。所需数据已从该公司收集。本研究使用层次分析法(AHP)来解决供应商选择和管理问题。对成本、质量、交付、灵活性和沟通这五个属性以及十家供应商进行了评估,以选出最佳供应商。Spark Printers是ACI制药公司的最佳供应商,因为它获得了最高分0.968,而Marvelous Printers Limited和Lutfur Enterprise分别是第二佳和第三佳供应商。层次分析法在制药供应链行业的应用非常有限。此外,以往的研究侧重于供应商选择,而非管理和采购政策。而且,行业从业者,尤其是发展中国家的从业者,可能由于时间、资金或技术限制而不使用复杂方法。考虑到这些因素,本研究旨在使用层次分析法,以行业友好的语言和分析模式选择并管理合适的供应商及其采购政策。其他面临类似问题的组织,如ACI制药公司,可能会从本研究中受益。尽管存在许多多准则决策(MCDM)技术,但本研究有意选择了层次分析法,且未给出任何方法学依据。未来可能会进行进一步研究,以找出哪种多准则决策方法最适合解决制药供应链行业的供应商选择问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1614/10372370/3b072142107a/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1614/10372370/ddfd68a96a4d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1614/10372370/2faddb832b52/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1614/10372370/3b072142107a/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1614/10372370/ddfd68a96a4d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1614/10372370/2faddb832b52/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1614/10372370/3b072142107a/fx2.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing the supplier selection problem by using the analytical hierarchy process.运用层次分析法解决供应商选择问题。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 11;9(7):e17997. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17997. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital.综合多准则决策方法解决供应商选择问题:医院案例研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Oct 10;2019:5614892. doi: 10.1155/2019/5614892. eCollection 2019.
3
Multicriteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management Using FMEA and Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Algorithms.使用 FMEA 和混合层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法的供应链管理中的多准则决策
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;23(8):4041. doi: 10.3390/s23084041.
4
A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.一种基于熵权-层次分析法加权理想解法的新型建筑材料供应商选择多准则决策模型
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 24;22(2):259. doi: 10.3390/e22020259.
5
Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets.基于区间型 2 模糊集的 BWM-TODIM 集成方法在纺织业绿色供应商选择中的应用:案例研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(45):64793-64817. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13832-7. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
6
Clustering sustainable suppliers in the plastics industry: A fuzzy equivalence relation approach.聚类可持续供应商在塑料行业:模糊等价关系方法。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118811. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118811. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
7
A model for green-resilient supplier selection: fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications.绿色弹性供应商选择模型:模糊最优最劣多准则决策方法及其应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):54035-54058. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25749-4. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
8
A supplier selection model in pharmaceutical supply chain using PCA, Z-TOPSIS and MILP: A case study.基于 PCA、Z-TOPSIS 和 MILP 的制药供应链供应商选择模型:案例研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 15;13(8):e0201604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201604. eCollection 2018.
9
Digital twin and fuzzy framework for supply chain sustainability risk assessment and management in supplier selection.供应商选择中供应链可持续性风险评估与管理的数字孪生与模糊框架
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67226-z.
10
Supplier selection in healthcare supply chain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy rough decision-making approach.新冠疫情期间医疗供应链管理中的供应商选择:一种新型模糊粗糙决策方法
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Jan 12:1-43. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-04529-2.

本文引用的文献

1
A multi-criteria decision-making framework for electric vehicle supplier selection of government agencies and public bodies in China.中国政府机构和公共机构电动汽车供应商选择的多准则决策框架。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):10540-10559. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22783-6. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
2
AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method.AHP-express:层次分析法的简化版本。
MethodsX. 2019 Dec 4;7:100748. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021. eCollection 2020.
3
Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection: Rule set database and exemplary decision support system implementation blueprints.
多标准方法选择的通用框架:规则集数据库及示例性决策支持系统实施蓝图
Data Brief. 2018 Dec 12;22:639-642. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.015. eCollection 2019 Feb.