• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基牙间距离对数字化和传统印模方法印模精度的影响。

Effect of inter-dental abutment distance on the impression accuracy of digital and conventional methods.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Med Life. 2023 May;16(5):736-742. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0103.

DOI:10.25122/jml-2023-0103
PMID:37520485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10375351/
Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of inter-dental abutment distance on the accuracy of digital and conventional impression methods. Five maxillary and mandibular models were prepared with different inter-dental abutment distances. Digital scans were obtained using an extraoral laboratory scanner as reference data. Each group was scanned 8 times using the intra-oral scanner for the digital method. For the conventional impression method, 8 additional silicone impression material was used to generate the stone casts from each group. Then casts were scanned. In the next step, stereolithography (STL) data was exported from the scans. The STL files were super-imposed on the reference scans using 3shape dental designer software to make the measurement. Kolmogorov-Smirnoff was used to determine if the data were normally distributed. In the digital impression method, as the abutment distance increased, the accuracy decreased. Various inter-dental abutment distances in digital groups showed significant differences (p=0.016) in impression accuracy, while the difference among conventional groups was not statistically significant (p=0.822). In the digital method, the mean inter-dental abutment between the 4-5 and 3-7 groups, 4-6 and 3-7 groups had a significant difference (p<0.05). However, the conventional method revealed no significant differences (p>0.05) between groups. In conclusion, when the inter-dental abutment distance exists and is surrounded by soft tissue, the possibility of error in the digital impression method is higher than in the conventional impression method.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨牙间支抗距离对数字和传统印模方法准确性的影响。制备了具有不同牙间支抗距离的 5 个上颌和下颌模型。使用口腔外实验室扫描仪获取数字扫描作为参考数据。使用口腔内扫描仪对每个组进行 8 次扫描,用于数字方法。对于传统印模方法,使用 8 个额外的硅橡胶印模材料从每组生成石铸模。然后对铸模进行扫描。在下一步中,从扫描中导出立体光刻 (STL) 数据。使用 3Shape 牙科设计软件将 STL 文件叠加到参考扫描上进行测量。使用 Kolmogorov-Smirnoff 确定数据是否呈正态分布。在数字印模方法中,随着牙间支抗距离的增加,准确性降低。数字组中各种牙间支抗距离的印模准确性显示出显著差异(p=0.016),而传统组之间的差异无统计学意义(p=0.822)。在数字方法中,4-5 组和 3-7 组、4-6 组和 3-7 组之间的牙间支抗距离存在显著差异(p<0.05)。然而,传统方法在组间没有显示出显著差异(p>0.05)。总之,当牙间支抗距离存在且被软组织包围时,数字印模方法的误差可能性高于传统印模方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f24/10375351/2ac973235bf6/JMedLife-16-736-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f24/10375351/2ac973235bf6/JMedLife-16-736-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f24/10375351/2ac973235bf6/JMedLife-16-736-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of inter-dental abutment distance on the impression accuracy of digital and conventional methods.基牙间距离对数字化和传统印模方法印模精度的影响。
J Med Life. 2023 May;16(5):736-742. doi: 10.25122/jml-2023-0103.
2
Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.基牙形态对传统和数字化印模方法准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):392-399. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.021. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.使用不同扫描技术的口内和口外扫描仪制作的3D打印模型和数字模型的准确性:体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Jul;31(6):521-528. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13443. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Accuracy of implant abutment level digital impressions using stereophotogrammetry in edentulous jaws: an in vitro pilot study.在无牙颌中使用立体摄影测量法进行种植体基台水平数字印模的准确性:一项体外初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):1167. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04888-1.
5
A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.一项评估几种口内和口外扫描仪在全牙弓和短跨度(3 单位 FPD)扫描中产生的数字和印刷模型的精度和准确性的对比研究:一项体外研究。
J Prosthodont. 2023 Jun;32(5):423-430. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13568. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
6
Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes.无牙患者的数字化与传统种植体印模:准确性结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):465-72. doi: 10.1111/clr.12567. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
7
Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.游离端鞍式局部牙列缺损患者种植印模技术准确性的数字化评估。一项对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Nov 12;22(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02505-7.
8
Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.椅旁口内扫描仪与实验室扫描仪在全上颌无牙颌中的准确性比较:一项体外三维比较分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Dec;124(6):761.e1-761.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
9
Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.采用传统印模或数字印模制作的 3 单位陶瓷固定义齿边缘适合性和内部适合性的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Sep;116(3):362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.018. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.与传统石膏模型相比,对数字模型和3D打印模型的准确性进行评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):438-444. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.039. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Effect of Distance Between Dental Abutments on the Accuracy of One-Step and Two-Step Impression Techniques With Polyvinyl Siloxane (PVS) Material.评估牙桥基牙间距对使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷(PVS)材料的一步法和两步法印模技术准确性的影响。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Feb;11(1):e70100. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70100.
2
A cross-sectional study on improving clinical efficiency through centralized digital impression.一项关于通过集中式数字印模提高临床效率的横断面研究。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 1;43(1):63-67. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024159.
3
Comparative Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Silicone-Based Putty Reline Impressions with Different Spacer Acquisition Techniques in Fixed Partial Dentures.

本文引用的文献

1
Green Alternatives as Antimicrobial Agents in Mitigating Periodontal Diseases: A Narrative Review.绿色替代物作为减轻牙周疾病的抗菌剂:一项叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2023 May 11;11(5):1269. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11051269.
2
Oral rehabilitation with dental implants in patients with systemic sclerosis: A systematic review.口腔种植修复在系统性硬化症患者中的应用:一项系统性综述。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023 Mar;11(3):e812. doi: 10.1002/iid3.812.
3
Assessing the Surface Modifications of Contaminated Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants Through Diode Lasers of Different Wavelengths: An Study.
固定局部义齿中不同间隔物获取技术的硅基腻子重衬印模尺寸精度的比较评估
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jan 14;31:e946537. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946537.
评估不同波长二极管激光对污染喷砂酸蚀种植体表面改性的研究。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023 May;41(5):201-211. doi: 10.1089/photob.2023.0009. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
4
The current regenerative medicine approaches of craniofacial diseases: A narrative review.颅面疾病的当前再生医学方法:一项叙述性综述。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Feb 28;11:1112378. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1112378. eCollection 2023.
5
Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.牙科水门汀:最新全面综述。
Molecules. 2023 Feb 8;28(4):1619. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041619.
6
Current Infections of the Orofacial Region: Treatment, Diagnosis, and Epidemiology.口腔面部区域的当前感染:治疗、诊断与流行病学
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;13(2):269. doi: 10.3390/life13020269.
7
Effect of abutment tooth location on the accuracy of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner for removable partial dentures.基牙位置对使用口腔内扫描仪获取可摘局部义齿数字印模准确性的影响。
J Prosthodont Res. 2023 Oct 13;67(4):531-538. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00201. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
8
Comparison of the accuracy of impressions made of 2 implants with interfering axial convergence with CAD-CAM impression copings and the altered cast technique: An in vitro study.比较 2 种带有干扰轴向会聚的种植体印模与 CAD-CAM 印模帽的准确性和改良的蜡型技术:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct;128(4):745.e1-745.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.04.004.
9
Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking Using Intraoral Scanner versus the Conventional Technique.使用口内扫描仪与传统技术进行数字印模采集的准确性。
Front Dent. 2021 Feb 10;18:6. doi: 10.18502/fid.v18i6.5649. eCollection 2021.
10
The Current Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activities of Synthetic/Herbal/Biomaterials in Dental Application.口腔应用中合成/草药/生物材料的抗菌和抗生物膜活性的最新研究进展
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 2;2022:8856025. doi: 10.1155/2022/8856025. eCollection 2022.