Center for Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Aug;29(8):970-980. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.8.970.
The mortality, morbidity, health care utilization, and cost attributable to vaccine-preventable diseases are substantial for those aged 50 years and older. Although vaccination is the most cost-effective strategy to prevent common infectious diseases in older adults, vaccination rates remain below US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention benchmarks, especially among racial minorities. Historical mistrust, structural racism within the US medical system, and misinformation contributed to lower immunization rates among minorities, especially Black Americans. To address the critical need to increase knowledge and trust in vaccination, 2 community-based educational interventions were tested: a pharmacist-led didactic session (PHARM) and a peer-led educational workshop (PEER). To determine and compare the effectiveness and costs of PEER and PHARM community-based education models in improving knowledge and trust in vaccinations. The Motivating Older adults to Trust Information about Vaccines And Their Effects (MOTIVATE) study was a cluster-randomized trial conducted in the greater Delaware Valley Region sites from 2017 to 2020. The included sites (7 senior centers, 3 housing units, 1 church, and 1 neighborhood family center) predominantly served Black communities. Participants were randomized to either PHARM or PEER sessions covering influenza, pneumococcal disease, herpes zoster, and beliefs related to vaccines. Peer leaders facilitated smaller workshops (5-10 participants), whereas pharmacists conducted larger didactic lectures with 15-43 participants. Outcomes were captured through a self-administered survey at baseline, postprogram, and 1 month after the program. Intervention costs were measured in 2017 US dollars. 287 participants were included. Their mean age was 74.5 years (SD = 8.94), 80.5% were women, 64.2% were Black, and 48.1% completed some college. Knowledge scores within groups for all 3 diseases significantly increased postprogram for both PEER and PHARM and were sustained at 1 month. Between-group knowledge differences were significant only for influenza (PEER participants had significantly larger improvement vs PHARM). Vaccination trust significantly increased in both groups. Total program costs were $11,411 for PEER and $5,104 for PHARM. Both interventions significantly improved knowledge and trust toward vaccination and retained their effect 1 month after the program. The 2 effective community-based education models should be expanded to ensure timely and trusted information is available to educate older adults about vaccine-preventable diseases. Further research is encouraged to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of these models' utilization on a larger scale. Dr Schafer is an employee of Merck; however, at the time of the project, he was a professor at Thomas Jefferson University. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. This study was supported in part by a research grant from the Investigator-Initiated Studies Program of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. The sponsor played no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the article. NCT03239665.
疫苗可预防疾病导致 50 岁及以上人群的死亡率、发病率、医疗保健利用率和费用相当高。尽管疫苗接种是预防老年人常见传染病最具成本效益的策略,但疫苗接种率仍低于美国疾病控制与预防中心的基准,尤其是在少数族裔中。历史上的不信任、美国医疗体系中的结构性种族主义和错误信息导致少数族裔,尤其是非裔美国人的免疫接种率较低。为了解决增加对疫苗接种的知识和信任的迫切需求,进行了两项基于社区的教育干预措施的测试:药剂师主导的专题讲座(PHARM)和同行主导的教育研讨会(PEER)。 为了确定和比较 PEER 和 PHARM 基于社区的教育模式在提高知识和信任疫苗接种方面的有效性和成本。 “激励老年人信任疫苗及其效果信息”(MOTIVATE)研究是一项 2017 年至 2020 年在特拉华河谷地区的多个地点进行的集群随机试验。纳入的地点(7 个老年人中心、3 个住房单元、1 个教堂和 1 个邻里家庭中心)主要为黑人社区服务。参与者被随机分配到接受涵盖流感、肺炎球菌病、带状疱疹和与疫苗相关的信念的 PHARM 或 PEER 课程。同行领导者主持了规模较小的研讨会(5-10 名参与者),而药剂师则举办了规模较大的有 15-43 名参与者的专题讲座。通过基线、项目后和项目后 1 个月的自我管理调查来获取结果。干预成本以 2017 年的美元衡量。 共有 287 名参与者。他们的平均年龄为 74.5 岁(SD=8.94),80.5%是女性,64.2%是黑人,48.1%完成了一些大学学业。所有 3 种疾病的知识得分在 PEER 和 PHARM 组中均在项目后显著增加,并且在 1 个月后仍保持不变。仅在流感方面,组间知识差异具有统计学意义(PEER 参与者的改善明显大于 PHARM)。疫苗接种信任度在两组中均显著增加。PEER 的总项目成本为 11411 美元,PHARM 的成本为 5104 美元。 两种干预措施均显著提高了对疫苗接种的知识和信任,并在项目结束后 1 个月保持了效果。这两种有效的基于社区的教育模式应该得到扩展,以确保及时和值得信赖的信息可用于向老年人宣传疫苗可预防疾病。鼓励进一步研究评估这些模型在更大规模上利用的长期成本效益。 Schafer 博士是默克公司的员工;然而,在项目进行时,他是托马斯杰斐逊大学的教授。其他作者没有利益冲突需要披露。本研究部分得到默克 Sharp & Dohme 公司发起的研究计划的资助。本文表达的观点是作者的观点,不一定代表默克 Sharp & Dohme 公司的观点。赞助商在研究的设计和实施、数据的收集、分析和解释、文章的准备、审查或批准方面没有任何作用。 NCT03239665。