• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验确定的特征塑造了野火发生后一到五年的细菌群落组成。

Experimentally determined traits shape bacterial community composition one and five years following wildfire.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

出版信息

Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Sep;7(9):1419-1431. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02135-4. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1038/s41559-023-02135-4
PMID:37524797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10482699/
Abstract

Wildfires represent major ecological disturbances, burning 2-3% of Earth's terrestrial area each year with sometimes drastic effects above- and belowground. Soil bacteria offer an ideal, yet understudied system within which to explore fundamental principles of fire ecology. To understand how wildfires restructure soil bacterial communities and alter their functioning, we sought to translate aboveground fire ecology to belowground systems by determining which microbial traits are important post-fire and whether changes in bacterial communities affect carbon cycling. We employed an uncommon approach to assigning bacterial traits, by first running three laboratory experiments to directly determine which microbes survive fires, grow quickly post-fire and/or thrive in the post-fire environment, while tracking CO emissions. We then quantified the abundance of taxa assigned to each trait in a large field dataset of soils one and five years after wildfires in the boreal forest of northern Canada. We found that fast-growing bacteria rapidly dominate post-fire soils but return to pre-burn relative abundances by five years post-fire. Although both fire survival and affinity for the post-fire environment were statistically significant predictors of post-fire community composition, neither are particularly influential. Our results from the incubation trials indicate that soil carbon fluxes post-wildfire are not likely limited by microbial communities, suggesting strong functional resilience. From these findings, we offer a traits-based framework of bacterial responses to wildfire.

摘要

野火是主要的生态干扰因素,每年会燃烧地球上 2-3%的陆地面积,有时会对地上和地下产生剧烈影响。土壤细菌是一个理想的、但研究不足的系统,可以用来探索火生态学的基本原理。为了了解野火如何重塑土壤细菌群落并改变其功能,我们试图通过确定哪些微生物特征在火灾后很重要,以及细菌群落的变化是否会影响碳循环,将地上火生态学转化为地下系统。我们采用了一种不常见的方法来分配细菌特征,首先进行了三个实验室实验,直接确定哪些微生物能够在火灾中存活、在火灾后快速生长和/或在火灾后环境中茁壮成长,同时跟踪 CO 排放。然后,我们在加拿大北部北方森林的野火发生一年和五年后的大型野外土壤数据集上,量化了分配给每个特征的分类群的丰度。我们发现,快速生长的细菌在火灾后土壤中迅速占据主导地位,但到火灾后五年时,它们的相对丰度会恢复到火灾前的水平。尽管火灾后生存能力和对火灾后环境的亲和力都是预测火灾后群落组成的统计学上显著的因素,但它们都不是特别有影响力。我们的培养试验结果表明,野火后土壤碳通量不太可能受到微生物群落的限制,这表明功能具有很强的恢复力。根据这些发现,我们提出了一个基于特征的细菌对野火响应的框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/49c364adf26b/41559_2023_2135_Fig16_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/70883397f39c/41559_2023_2135_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/03cb090186db/41559_2023_2135_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/2e583c0c6556/41559_2023_2135_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/f9ff7fb24eda/41559_2023_2135_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/e13a80262776/41559_2023_2135_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/a921db2c5019/41559_2023_2135_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/f1c3fab5d61d/41559_2023_2135_Fig7_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/edf4dea15b4b/41559_2023_2135_Fig8_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/c97d7d600960/41559_2023_2135_Fig9_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/ff362ef2d011/41559_2023_2135_Fig10_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/3b07cafc3615/41559_2023_2135_Fig11_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/eb2c2bc99c92/41559_2023_2135_Fig12_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/d60a4ba3174e/41559_2023_2135_Fig13_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/6caa38b862aa/41559_2023_2135_Fig14_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/b626e9bc434b/41559_2023_2135_Fig15_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/49c364adf26b/41559_2023_2135_Fig16_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/70883397f39c/41559_2023_2135_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/03cb090186db/41559_2023_2135_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/2e583c0c6556/41559_2023_2135_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/f9ff7fb24eda/41559_2023_2135_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/e13a80262776/41559_2023_2135_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/a921db2c5019/41559_2023_2135_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/f1c3fab5d61d/41559_2023_2135_Fig7_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/edf4dea15b4b/41559_2023_2135_Fig8_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/c97d7d600960/41559_2023_2135_Fig9_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/ff362ef2d011/41559_2023_2135_Fig10_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/3b07cafc3615/41559_2023_2135_Fig11_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/eb2c2bc99c92/41559_2023_2135_Fig12_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/d60a4ba3174e/41559_2023_2135_Fig13_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/6caa38b862aa/41559_2023_2135_Fig14_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/b626e9bc434b/41559_2023_2135_Fig15_ESM.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a3/10482699/49c364adf26b/41559_2023_2135_Fig16_ESM.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimentally determined traits shape bacterial community composition one and five years following wildfire.实验确定的特征塑造了野火发生后一到五年的细菌群落组成。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Sep;7(9):1419-1431. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02135-4. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Boreal forest soil carbon fluxes one year after a wildfire: Effects of burn severity and management.北方森林火烧后一年土壤碳通量:火烧强度和管理的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Sep;27(17):4181-4195. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15721. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
3
Effects of wildfire disturbance on forest soil microbes and colonization of ericoid mycorrhizal fungi in northern China.野火干扰对中国北方森林土壤微生物和杜鹃花类菌根真菌定殖的影响。
Environ Res. 2023 Aug 15;231(Pt 2):116220. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116220. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
How do forest fires affect soil greenhouse gas emissions in upland boreal forests? A review.林火如何影响北方旱地森林土壤温室气体排放?综述。
Environ Res. 2020 May;184:109328. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109328. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
5
Effect of fire and post-fire management on soil microbial communities in a lower subtropical forest ecosystem after a mountain fire.山火后,火烧及火烧后管理对亚热带低地森林生态系统土壤微生物群落的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb;351:119885. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119885. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
6
Wildfire-induced increases in photosynthesis in boreal forest ecosystems of North America.北美北方森林生态系统中野火引起的光合作用增加。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e17151. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17151.
7
Contrasting fungal responses to wildfire across different ecosystem types.不同生态系统类型中真菌对野火的不同反应
Mol Ecol. 2021 Feb;30(3):844-854. doi: 10.1111/mec.15767. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
Climate-induced Arctic-boreal peatland fire and carbon loss in the 21st century.21 世纪气候引发的北极-北方泥炭地火灾和碳损失。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 20;796:148924. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148924. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
9
Burn me twice, shame on who? Interactions between successive forest fires across a temperate mountain region.两度被烧伤,羞煞谁?温带山区连续森林火灾间的相互作用。
Ecology. 2016 Sep;97(9):2272-2282. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1439.
10
Ecological and genomic responses of soil microbiomes to high-severity wildfire: linking community assembly to functional potential.土壤微生物组对高强度野火的生态和基因组响应:将群落组装与功能潜力联系起来。
ISME J. 2022 Jul;16(7):1853-1863. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01232-9. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Fire Limits Soil Microbial Dispersal and Differentially Impacts Bacterial and Fungal Communities.火灾限制土壤微生物扩散并对细菌和真菌群落产生不同影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Aug;31(8):e70386. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70386.
2
Fire Frequency Driven Increases in Burn Heterogeneity Promote Microbial Beta Diversity: A Test of the Pyrodiversity-Biodiversity Hypothesis.火烧频率驱动的火烧异质性增加促进微生物β多样性:火多样性-生物多样性假说的检验
Mol Ecol. 2025 May;34(10):e17756. doi: 10.1111/mec.17756. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
3
Wildfire impact on soil microbiome life history traits and roles in ecosystem carbon cycling.

本文引用的文献

1
Wildfire-dependent changes in soil microbiome diversity and function.依赖野火的土壤微生物组多样性和功能变化。
Nat Microbiol. 2022 Sep;7(9):1419-1430. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01203-y. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
Effects of short-interval reburns in the boreal forest on soil bacterial communities compared to long-interval reburns.短间隔再燃对北方森林土壤细菌群落的影响与长间隔再燃相比。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2022 Jul 21;98(8). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiac069.
3
MODELING MICROBIAL ABUNDANCES AND DYSBIOSIS WITH BETA-BINOMIAL REGRESSION.使用贝塔二项式回归对微生物丰度和生态失调进行建模。
野火对土壤微生物群落生活史特征及其在生态系统碳循环中的作用的影响。
ISME Commun. 2024 Aug 27;4(1):ycae108. doi: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae108. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Central Taxa Are Keystone Microbes During Early Succession.核心分类群是早期演替过程中的关键微生物。
Ecol Lett. 2025 Jan;28(1):e70031. doi: 10.1111/ele.70031.
Ann Appl Stat. 2020 Mar;14(1):94-115. doi: 10.1214/19-aoas1283. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
4
Nitrogen speciation and transformations in fire-derived organic matter.火成有机物中的氮形态与转化
Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2020 May 1;276:170-185. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2020.02.034.
5
Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories.基于推断的宏基因组预测工具的准确性在样本类型和功能类别上有所不同。
Microbiome. 2020 Apr 2;8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00815-y.
6
Dormancy dynamics and dispersal contribute to soil microbiome resilience.休眠动态和扩散有助于土壤微生物组的恢复力。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 May 11;375(1798):20190255. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0255. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
7
A simple pyrocosm for studying soil microbial response to fire reveals a rapid, massive response by Pyronema species.一种简单的热灰烬用于研究土壤微生物对火灾的反应,揭示了 Pyronema 物种的快速、大规模反应。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0222691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222691. eCollection 2020.
8
Influence of Substrate Concentration on the Culturability of Heterotrophic Soil Microbes Isolated by High-Throughput Dilution-to-Extinction Cultivation.基质浓度对高通量稀释-灭绝培养分离的异养土壤微生物可培养性的影响。
mSphere. 2020 Jan 29;5(1):e00024-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00024-20.
9
High-severity wildfire leads to multi-decadal impacts on soil biogeochemistry in mixed-conifer forests.高强度野火导致混交针叶林土壤生物地球化学出现数十年的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jun;30(4):e02072. doi: 10.1002/eap.2072. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
10
Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change.定义基于性状的微生物策略及其在气候变化下对土壤碳循环的影响。
ISME J. 2020 Jan;14(1):1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0510-0. Epub 2019 Sep 25.