University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Kentucky, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2023 Aug;50(4):493-499. doi: 10.1177/10901981231178828.
Assimilation theories dominate immigration scholarship to examine differential life chances, opportunities, and health of immigrants across three waves of immigrants in the United States. Assimilation theories are widely used in public health to explain the health status of immigrants despite the embedded White supremacist ideology while ignoring the role of whiteness. This article reviews and critiques assimilation theories to propose a critical analysis of whiteness in immigrant health scholarship. Critically analyzing whiteness in immigrant health studies allows us to recognize (a) the problematic framing of assimilation theories because of the theories' devotion to a White-European vision of upward mobility and a mainstream characterized as elite and White and (b) how a purportedly colorblind immigration law reinforces White supremacy through possessive investment in whiteness. To highlight whiteness in immigrant health, we examine the anti-immigration rhetoric and anti-immigrant policies and surveillance while providing implications for future research in the scholarship of immigrant health.
同化理论主导着移民学术研究,以考察美国三波移民中移民的不同生活机会、机会和健康。尽管同化理论中嵌入了白人至上主义意识形态,但却忽略了白人的作用,因此该理论被广泛应用于公共卫生领域,用以解释移民的健康状况。本文回顾并批判了同化理论,以提出对移民健康研究中白人问题的批判性分析。批判性地分析移民健康研究中的白人问题,使我们能够认识到:(a)由于这些理论致力于白人至上的欧洲式向上流动愿景,以及主流精英和白人特征,同化理论的框架存在问题;(b)所谓的“色盲”移民法如何通过对白人的占有性投资来强化白人至上。为了突出移民健康中的白人问题,我们考察了反移民言论、反移民政策和监视,同时为移民健康学术研究中的未来研究提供了启示。