• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体力活动干预精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者的成本效益分析:系统评价。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of physical activity interventions for people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: systematic review.

机构信息

King's Health Economics (KHE), Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;223(2):362-376. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2023.52. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.2023.52
PMID:37526007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10405045/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines recommend providing physical activity interventions (PAIs) to people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder for weight management. However, the cost-effectiveness of PAIs is unknown.

AIMS

To evaluate the availability and methodological quality of economic evaluations of PAIs for people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

METHOD

Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo and Scopus) were searched on 5 July 2022. Based on the retrieved studies, forward and backward citation searches were conducted. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the Drummond checklist. Review results were presented using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles reporting nine studies were included. All included studies assessed PAIs within a multicomponent lifestyle intervention. Mixed findings were reported on the cost-effectiveness of multicomponent lifestyle intervention: three studies reported it as cost-effective; four studies reported it as not cost-effective; and two studies did not conclude whether it was cost-effective or not. Very limited evidence suggests that certain patient subgroups might be more likely to benefit from multicomponent lifestyle interventions with a PAI component: men; individuals with comorbid type 2 diabetes; and individuals who have been psychiatric hospital in-patients for ≥1 year. The quality of included studies ranged from moderate to high.

CONCLUSIONS

The current economic evidence suggests that not all modalities of multicomponent lifestyle intervention including a PAI component are cost-effective for people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder; and not all people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder would benefit equally from the intervention. Future research is urgently needed to identify the cost-effective modality of PAI for different patient subgroups.

摘要

背景

临床指南建议为患有精神分裂症或双相情感障碍的患者提供身体活动干预(PAI)以进行体重管理。然而,PAI 的成本效益尚不清楚。

目的

评估针对精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者的 PAI 的经济评估的可用性和方法学质量。

方法

于 2022 年 7 月 5 日在 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycInfo 和 Scopus 这四个数据库中进行了检索。基于检索到的研究,进行了正向和反向引文搜索。两名审查员独立选择纳入的研究。使用 Drummond 清单评估研究质量。使用叙述性综合法呈现审查结果。

结果

纳入了 14 篇报道了 9 项研究的文章。所有纳入的研究均评估了多组分生活方式干预中的 PAI。多组分生活方式干预的成本效益结果存在混合发现:三项研究报告其具有成本效益;四项研究报告其不具有成本效益;两项研究未得出其是否具有成本效益的结论。有非常有限的证据表明,某些患者亚组可能更有可能从包含 PAI 成分的多组分生活方式干预中获益:男性;合并 2 型糖尿病的个体;以及曾因精神疾病住院治疗≥1 年的个体。纳入研究的质量从中等至高不等。

结论

目前的经济证据表明,并非所有包含 PAI 成分的多组分生活方式干预模式对精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者都是具有成本效益的;并非所有精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者都会从干预中平等受益。迫切需要开展未来研究以确定针对不同患者亚组的 PAI 的成本效益模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/10405045/b79f7de5f7d7/S0007125023000521_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/10405045/a12fd64c363f/S0007125023000521_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/10405045/b79f7de5f7d7/S0007125023000521_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/10405045/a12fd64c363f/S0007125023000521_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3fc/10405045/b79f7de5f7d7/S0007125023000521_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of physical activity interventions for people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: systematic review.体力活动干预精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者的成本效益分析:系统评价。
Br J Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;223(2):362-376. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2023.52. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
3
Management of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.冻结肩的治疗:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(11):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta16110.
4
What is the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using drugs in treating obese patients in primary care? A systematic review.在初级保健中使用药物治疗肥胖患者的临床效果和成本效益如何?系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(5):iii-xiv, 1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta16050.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of long-term weight management schemes for adults: a systematic review.长期成人体重管理计划的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(2):1-182. doi: 10.3310/hta15020.
7
A rapid and systematic review and economic evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for treatment of mania associated with bipolar affective disorder.对用于治疗双相情感障碍相关躁狂症的新型药物的临床疗效及成本效益进行快速系统评价与经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 May;8(19):iii-iv, 1-187. doi: 10.3310/hta8190.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of exercise on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.运动对 COVID-19 大流行期间心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 4;11:1279599. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1279599. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Lifestyle-Enhancing Treatment for Inpatients With Severe Mental Illness: The MULTI Study V.针对重度精神疾病住院患者的多学科生活方式强化治疗的成本效益:MULTI研究V
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Feb 23;3(1):sgac022. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac022. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of a lifestyle intervention to improve cardiometabolic health in patients with severe mental illness.一项生活方式干预对改善重度精神疾病患者心脏代谢健康的成本效益和预算影响。
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2020 Dec 14;7:131-138. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2020.2027. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
3
The Societal Cost of Schizophrenia: An Updated Systematic Review of Cost-of-Illness Studies.
精神分裂症的社会成本:疾病成本研究的最新系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Feb;41(2):139-153. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01217-8. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
4
Combining cost-effectiveness results into a single measurement: What is the value?将成本效益结果整合为单一衡量指标:其价值何在?
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jul 14;51:101563. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101563. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Implementation of a lifestyle intervention for people with a severe mental illness (SMILE): a process evaluation.严重精神障碍患者生活方式干预的实施(SMILE):过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 5;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07391-3.
6
Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in People With Severe Mental Illness: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.患有严重精神疾病的人群中超重和肥胖的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 25;12:769309. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.769309. eCollection 2021.
7
Factors Limiting Subgroup Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and a Call for Transparency.限制成本效益分析中亚组分析的因素及透明度呼吁。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Feb;40(2):149-156. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01108-4. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
8
The roles of motivational interviewing and self-efficacy on outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a community-based exercise intervention for inactive middle-older aged adults.动机性访谈和自我效能感对社区为基础的中老年不活跃人群运动干预的结果和成本效益的作用。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Jul;30(4):e1048-e1060. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13510. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
9
Mindfulness-based group therapy for in-patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders - Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of a rater-blinded randomized controlled trial.基于正念的团体治疗对精神分裂症谱系障碍住院患者的可行性、可接受性和初步结果:一项设盲随机对照试验。
Schizophr Res. 2021 Feb;228:134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.12.008. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
GRADE Guidelines 30: the GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of modeled evidence-An overview in the context of health decision-making.GRADE 指南 30:建模证据确定性评估的 GRADE 方法——在卫生决策背景下的概述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;129:138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 24.