Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Jan;35(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01757-0. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
Five-year relative survival for ovarian cancer remains below 50%. Strategies to improve outcomes are needed. Higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations [measure of vitamin D status] at and before diagnosis have been associated with longer survival in cancer patients; however, data for ovarian cancer are limited. We aimed to determine if 25(OH)D concentrations during and after primary treatment were associated with ovarian cancer-specific survival.
We used data from a nationwide prospective cohort study of women with ovarian cancer. Among 886 participants treated with chemotherapy, 700 (79%) had a blood sample collected during (n = 591) and/or after (n = 458) primary treatment. These were tested for 25(OH)D. Clinical and survival data were abstracted from medical records. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between 25(OH)D and ovarian cancer-specific survival.
Mean 25(OH)D concentrations were lower during than after primary treatment (82 and 91 nmol/L, respectively); only 14% and 8% had concentrations below 50 nmol/L during and after primary treatment, respectively. There was no association between 25(OH)D and ovarian cancer-specific survival during five years of follow-up [HR 1.10 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.61) and 0.95 (0.54, 1.68) for the highest vs. lowest quintile during and after treatment, respectively].
We did not observe any association between serum 25(OH)D concentration and ovarian cancer-specific survival. Our results suggest that, in the absence of vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D supplementation to improve ovarian cancer survival is not warranted.
卵巢癌的 5 年相对生存率仍低于 50%。需要采取策略来改善治疗效果。癌症患者在诊断时和诊断前血清 25-羟维生素 D [25(OH)D]浓度[维生素 D 状态的衡量指标]较高与生存时间延长有关;然而,关于卵巢癌的数据有限。我们旨在确定原发性治疗期间和之后的 25(OH)D 浓度是否与卵巢癌特异性生存相关。
我们使用了一项全国性前瞻性卵巢癌患者队列研究的数据。在 886 名接受化疗的患者中,有 700 名(79%)在原发性治疗期间(n=591)和/或之后(n=458)采集了血液样本进行 25(OH)D 检测。从病历中提取临床和生存数据。我们使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归来估计 25(OH)D 与卵巢癌特异性生存之间的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
原发性治疗期间的平均 25(OH)D 浓度低于治疗后(分别为 82 和 91 nmol/L);仅 14%和 8%在原发性治疗期间和之后的浓度低于 50 nmol/L。在五年的随访期间,25(OH)D 与卵巢癌特异性生存之间没有关联[治疗期间和治疗后最高五分位数与最低五分位数的 HR 分别为 1.10(95%CI:0.76,1.61)和 0.95(0.54,1.68)]。
我们没有观察到血清 25(OH)D 浓度与卵巢癌特异性生存之间存在任何关联。我们的结果表明,在不存在维生素 D 缺乏的情况下,维生素 D 补充剂并不能改善卵巢癌的生存。