Cummings S R, Lillington G A, Richard R J
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986 Sep;134(3):453-60. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1986.134.3.453.
The best approach to the initial management of solitary pulmonary nodules is controversial. Using decision analysis, we compared the average life expectancy produced by alternative strategies for managing the patient with a solitary pulmonary nodule: thoracotomy for diagnosis and potential resection (IMMEDIATE SURGERY); needle aspiration biopsy or bronchoscopy (BIOPSY) followed by either thoracotomy or extended observation, depending on the results of the biopsy; and serial chest films with thoracotomy if the nodule grows at a potentially malignant rate (OBSERVATION). IMMEDIATE SURGERY produced a slightly longer average life expectancy when the probability of cancer was very high; BIOPSY had a narrow advantage when the probability of cancer was intermediate; and OBSERVATION produced slightly longer average life-expectancy when the probability of malignancy was very low. But the differences between strategies were so small that, in most circumstances, the decision was a "close call." Therefore, when choosing between these management strategies, physicians should give greater weight to considerations besides life expectancy, and should encourage patients to actively participate in the decisions about how to manage their solitary pulmonary nodules.
孤立性肺结节初始管理的最佳方法存在争议。通过决策分析,我们比较了针对孤立性肺结节患者的不同管理策略所产生的平均预期寿命:开胸手术用于诊断及可能的切除(立即手术);针吸活检或支气管镜检查(活检),然后根据活检结果进行开胸手术或延长观察期;以及如果结节以潜在恶性速度生长则进行系列胸部X光检查并开胸手术(观察)。当癌症概率非常高时,立即手术产生的平均预期寿命略长;当癌症概率为中等时,活检有微弱优势;当恶性概率非常低时,观察产生的平均预期寿命略长。但不同策略之间的差异非常小,在大多数情况下,决策都“难以抉择”。因此,在这些管理策略之间进行选择时,医生应更重视预期寿命之外的因素,并应鼓励患者积极参与关于如何管理其孤立性肺结节的决策。