• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恐怖袭击加剧了“我们”与“他们”的二元对立观念。

Terrorist attacks sharpen the binary perception of "Us" vs. "Them".

作者信息

Jović Milan, Šubelj Lovro, Golob Tea, Makarovič Matej, Yasseri Taha, Krstićev Danijela Boberić, Škrbić Srdjan, Levnajić Zoran

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.

Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 1;13(1):12451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39035-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-39035-3
PMID:37528134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10394060/
Abstract

Terrorist attacks not only harm citizens but also shift their attention, which has long-lasting impacts on public opinion and government policies. Yet measuring the changes in public attention beyond media coverage has been methodologically challenging. Here we approach this problem by starting from Wikipedia's répertoire of 5.8 million articles and a sample of 15 recent terrorist attacks. We deploy a complex exclusion procedure to identify topics and themes that consistently received a significant increase in attention due to these incidents. Examining their contents reveals a clear picture: terrorist attacks foster establishing a sharp boundary between "Us" (the target society) and "Them" (the terrorist as the enemy). In the midst of this, one seeks to construct identities of both sides. This triggers curiosity to learn more about "Them" and soul-search for a clearer understanding of "Us". This systematic analysis of public reactions to disruptive events could help mitigate their societal consequences.

摘要

恐怖袭击不仅会伤害公民,还会转移他们的注意力,这对公众舆论和政府政策有着持久的影响。然而,衡量媒体报道之外公众注意力的变化在方法上具有挑战性。在这里,我们从维基百科的580万篇文章和15起近期恐怖袭击事件的样本入手来解决这个问题。我们采用了一个复杂的排除程序,以识别因这些事件而持续获得显著关注度提升的主题。对其内容进行审视会呈现出一幅清晰的画面:恐怖袭击促使在“我们”(目标社会)和“他们”(作为敌人的恐怖分子)之间建立起鲜明的界限。在此过程中,人们试图构建双方的身份认同。这引发了对了解“他们”更多信息的好奇心,并促使人们进行深刻反思以更清楚地了解“我们”。这种对公众对破坏性事件反应的系统分析有助于减轻其社会后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/2c29609d4183/41598_2023_39035_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/0212e611d566/41598_2023_39035_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/a1360b334332/41598_2023_39035_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/c72d624b0a6f/41598_2023_39035_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/e3bdc6e78c03/41598_2023_39035_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/bee262715277/41598_2023_39035_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/09562f6b9397/41598_2023_39035_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/c5838b1df113/41598_2023_39035_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/125ae2b8808e/41598_2023_39035_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/2c29609d4183/41598_2023_39035_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/0212e611d566/41598_2023_39035_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/a1360b334332/41598_2023_39035_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/c72d624b0a6f/41598_2023_39035_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/e3bdc6e78c03/41598_2023_39035_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/bee262715277/41598_2023_39035_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/09562f6b9397/41598_2023_39035_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/c5838b1df113/41598_2023_39035_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/125ae2b8808e/41598_2023_39035_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa1/10394060/2c29609d4183/41598_2023_39035_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Terrorist attacks sharpen the binary perception of "Us" vs. "Them".恐怖袭击加剧了“我们”与“他们”的二元对立观念。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 1;13(1):12451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39035-3.
2
Terrorists Use of Ambulances for Terror Attacks: A Review.恐怖分子利用救护车实施恐怖袭击:综述
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Feb;36(1):14-17. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20001260. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Terrorist attacks escalate in frequency and fatalities preceding highly lethal attacks.在高致死性袭击发生之前,恐怖袭击的频率和死亡人数会上升。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e93732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093732. eCollection 2014.
4
Public health preparedness for maritime terrorist attacks on ports and coastal waters.针对港口和沿海水域海上恐怖袭击的公共卫生防范措施。
Am J Disaster Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;3(6):377-84.
5
Terrorist Attacks against Hospitals: World-Wide Trends and Attack Types.恐怖袭击医院:全球趋势和袭击类型。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Feb;37(1):25-32. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000012. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
6
Mass casualty response in the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks.2008 年孟买恐怖袭击事件中的大规模伤亡应对。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011 Dec;5(4):273-9. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2011.80. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
7
The Rising Threat of Terrorist Attacks Against Hospitals.恐怖袭击医院的威胁日益严重。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Apr;37(2):223-229. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000413.
8
Effects of terrorist attacks on access to maternal healthcare services: a national longitudinal study in Burkina Faso.恐怖袭击对获得孕产妇医疗保健服务的影响:布基纳法索的一项全国纵向研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002879.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Assessing the relationship between terrorist attacks against ingroup or outgroup members and public support for terrorism.评估针对内群体或外群体成员的恐怖袭击与公众对恐怖主义的支持之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 3;13:778714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.778714. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Terrorism group prediction using feature combination and BiGRU with self-attention mechanism.基于特征组合和带自注意力机制的双向门控循环单元的恐怖主义组织预测
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 Sep 20;10:e2252. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2252. eCollection 2024.
2
The shadow of fear: hate crime victimization and stress after Charlottesville.恐惧的阴影:夏洛茨维尔事件后的仇恨犯罪受害情况与压力
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1384470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384470. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting non-state terrorism worldwide.预测全球范围内的非国家恐怖主义活动。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jul 30;7(31). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg4778. Print 2021 Jul.
2
Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science.计算社会科学中的解释与预测融合。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7866):181-188. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
Hurricanes and hashtags: Characterizing online collective attention for natural disasters.飓风与话题标签:自然灾害的在线集体关注度分析
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0251762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251762. eCollection 2021.
4
The breakdown of antiracist norms: A natural experiment on hate speech after terrorist attacks.反种族主义规范的崩溃:恐怖袭击后仇恨言论的自然实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 15;117(37):22800-22804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007977117. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Why Humans Are Vulnerable to Conspiracy Theories.为何人类容易相信阴谋论。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jan 1;72(1):3-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000348. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
6
Media exposure to mass violence events can fuel a cycle of distress.媒体对大规模暴力事件的曝光可能会加剧痛苦的循环。
Sci Adv. 2019 Apr 17;5(4):eaav3502. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav3502. eCollection 2019 Apr.
7
Accelerating dynamics of collective attention.集体关注的加速动力学。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 15;10(1):1759. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09311-w.
8
The universal decay of collective memory and attention.普遍的集体记忆和注意力衰退。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jan;3(1):82-91. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0474-5. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
9
Collective Emotions and Social Resilience in the Digital Traces After a Terrorist Attack.恐怖袭击后的数字痕迹中的集体情绪和社会弹性。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Apr;30(4):617-628. doi: 10.1177/0956797619831964. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural.连点成线:虚幻的模式认知预示着对阴谋论和超自然现象的笃信。
Eur J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;48(3):320-335. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2331. Epub 2017 Sep 25.