• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压远程监测的促进因素和障碍:一项混合方法研究。

Facilitators and barriers to blood pressure telemonitoring: A mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Eze Chinwe E, Dorsch Michael P, Coe Antoinette B, Lester Corey A, Buis Lorraine R, Farris Karen B

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2023 Jul 25;9:20552076231187585. doi: 10.1177/20552076231187585. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076231187585
PMID:37529536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10387707/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Telemonitoring of blood pressure (BP) may improve BP control. However, many patients are not using BP telemonitoring due to personal, technological, and health system barriers. Individuals are required to have electronic health literacy (e-HL), defined as knowledge and skills to use technology services effectively, such as BP telemonitoring.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to determine the facilitators and barriers experienced by patients with hypertension in telemonitoring of BP using the e-HL framework (e-HLF).

METHODS

This study was a prospective mixed-methods study using a convergent design. We recruited a convenience sample of 21 patients with hypertension. The qualitative section was online or phone individual in-depth interviews based on the e-HLF, which has seven domains. The quantitative section was an online survey consisting of demographics, an e-HL questionnaire, and patient-provider communication preferences. A joint display was used in the mixed-methods analysis.

RESULTS

Five themes including knowledge, motivation, skills, systems, and behaviors along with 28 subthemes comprising facilitators or barriers of BP telemonitoring were identified. The mixed-methods results showed concordance between the participants' e-HL status and their experiences in the ability to actively engage with BP monitoring and managing digital services (domain 3) of the e-HLF. Other e-HL domains showed discordance.

CONCLUSION

Patients may engage with BP telemonitoring when they feel the usefulness of concurrent access to telemonitoring services that suit their needs.

摘要

背景

血压远程监测可能会改善血压控制情况。然而,由于个人、技术和卫生系统等方面的障碍,许多患者并未使用血压远程监测。个人需要具备电子健康素养(e-HL),即有效使用技术服务(如血压远程监测)的知识和技能。

目的

目的是使用电子健康素养框架(e-HLF)确定高血压患者在血压远程监测中所经历的促进因素和障碍。

方法

本研究是一项采用聚合设计的前瞻性混合方法研究。我们招募了21名高血压患者的便利样本。定性部分是基于具有七个领域的e-HLF进行的在线或电话个人深度访谈。定量部分是一项在线调查,包括人口统计学、电子健康素养问卷以及患者与提供者的沟通偏好。在混合方法分析中使用了联合展示。

结果

确定了五个主题,包括知识、动机、技能、系统和行为,以及28个子主题,涵盖血压远程监测的促进因素或障碍。混合方法结果显示,参与者的电子健康素养状况与他们在积极参与血压监测和管理e-HLF数字服务(领域3)的能力方面的经历之间存在一致性。其他电子健康素养领域则存在不一致。

结论

当患者认为同时使用符合其需求的远程监测服务有用时,他们可能会参与血压远程监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd8/10387707/f219c25fc71d/10.1177_20552076231187585-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd8/10387707/f219c25fc71d/10.1177_20552076231187585-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dd8/10387707/f219c25fc71d/10.1177_20552076231187585-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to blood pressure telemonitoring: A mixed-methods study.血压远程监测的促进因素和障碍:一项混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2023 Jul 25;9:20552076231187585. doi: 10.1177/20552076231187585. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Exploring the patient experience of remote hypertension management in Scotland during COVID-19: a qualitative study.探索 COVID-19 期间苏格兰远程高血压管理中患者的体验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e078944. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078944.
3
Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring: Rationale for Use, Required Elements, and Barriers to Implementation in Canada.家庭血压远程监测:在加拿大的使用理由、必备要素和实施障碍。
Can J Cardiol. 2017 May;33(5):619-625. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.12.018. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
4
What influences patients' acceptance of a blood pressure telemonitoring service in primary care? A qualitative study.在初级保健中,哪些因素会影响患者对血压远程监测服务的接受度?一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jan 27;10:99-106. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S94687. eCollection 2016.
5
Evaluating the Implementation of a Mobile Phone-Based Telemonitoring Program: Longitudinal Study Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.评估基于手机的远程监测项目的实施情况:以实施研究整合框架为指导的纵向研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jul 31;6(7):e10768. doi: 10.2196/10768.
6
Telemonitoring at scale for hypertension in primary care: An implementation study.大规模远程监控在初级保健中的高血压应用:一项实施研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jun 17;17(6):e1003124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003124. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Patient and Health Professional Perceptions of Telemonitoring for Hypertension Management: Qualitative Study.患者与医疗专业人员对高血压管理远程监测的认知:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 10;6(6):e32874. doi: 10.2196/32874.
8
Usability and Acceptability of a Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring Device Among Community-Dwelling Senior Citizens With Hypertension: Qualitative Study.社区高血压老年居民家庭血压远程监测设备的可用性和可接受性:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2018 Jul 24;1(2):e10975. doi: 10.2196/10975.
9
Feasibility of a noninvasive heart failure telemonitoring system: A mixed methods study.非侵入性心力衰竭远程监测系统的可行性:一项混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 12;10:20552076241272633. doi: 10.1177/20552076241272633. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Telemonitoring and Protocolized Case Management for Hypertensive Community-Dwelling Seniors With Diabetes: Protocol of the TECHNOMED Randomized Controlled Trial.针对患有糖尿病的社区老年高血压患者的远程监测与标准化病例管理:TECHNOMED随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jun 24;5(2):e107. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5775.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Primary Care Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Quality Improvement Pilot.一项针对基层医疗远程血压监测质量改进试点项目的混合方法评估。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251358000. doi: 10.1177/21501319251358000. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Facilitators and barriers of a subscriber identity module enabled, remote blood pressure monitoring system for residents of a low-income housing: A feasibility study.针对低收入住房居民的、启用用户身份模块的远程血压监测系统的促进因素和障碍:一项可行性研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 2;11:20552076251347732. doi: 10.1177/20552076251347732. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2022 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
Predictors of Smartphone and Tablet Use Among Patients With Hypertension: Secondary Analysis of Health Information National Trends Survey Data.高血压患者使用智能手机和平板电脑的预测因素:健康信息国家趋势调查数据的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 24;24(1):e33188. doi: 10.2196/33188.
3
Comparing the Acceptance of Mobile Hypertension Apps for Disease Management Among Patients Versus Clinical Use Among Physicians: Cross-sectional Survey.
Patient Engagement in a Hybrid Care Pathway for Hypertension: Not One Size Fits All.
高血压混合护理路径中的患者参与:并非一概而论。
J Patient Exp. 2024 Dec 8;11:23743735241297626. doi: 10.1177/23743735241297626. eCollection 2024.
4
Hospital Is Not the Home: Lessons From Implementing Remote Technology to Support Acute Inpatient and Transitional Care in the Home in the United States and United Kingdom.医院不是家:美国和英国实施远程技术支持急性住院和居家过渡护理的经验教训。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 11;26:e58888. doi: 10.2196/58888.
比较患者对用于疾病管理的移动高血压应用程序的接受度与医生的临床使用情况:横断面调查。
JMIR Cardio. 2022 Jan 6;6(1):e31617. doi: 10.2196/31617.
4
eHealth Literacy Instruments: Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.电子健康素养测评工具:系统评价测量特性
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 15;23(11):e30644. doi: 10.2196/30644.
5
Patients' Technology Readiness and eHealth Literacy: Implications for Adoption and Deployment of eHealth in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.患者的技术准备和电子健康素养:对 COVID-19 时代及以后电子健康的采用和部署的影响。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Nov 2;40(4):244-250. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000854.
6
An Updated Meta-Analysis of Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring in Urban-Dwelling Patients with Hypertension.一项关于城市高血压患者远程血压监测的更新荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 9;18(20):10583. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010583.
7
Validity Evidence Based on Relations to Other Variables of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ): Bayesian Approach to Test for Known-Groups Validity.基于与其他变量关系的电子健康素养问卷 (eHLQ) 的有效性证据:用于检验已知组有效性的贝叶斯方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 14;23(10):e30243. doi: 10.2196/30243.
8
Internet Use, Electronic Health Literacy, and Hypertension Control among the Elderly at an Urban Primary Care Center in Thailand: A Cross-Sectional Study.互联网使用、电子健康素养与泰国城市基层医疗中心老年高血压控制:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 11;18(18):9574. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189574.
9
Factors influencing the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring interventions: a realist review.影响远程患者监护干预效果的因素:一个现实主义综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 25;11(8):e051844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051844.
10
Telehealth is here to stay.远程医疗将持续存在。
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1121. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01447-x.