• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活体肝移植中供肝剩余体积小于 30%的供者安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2023 Sep;37(9):e15080. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15080. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.15080
PMID:37529969
Abstract

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the acceptability of donor remnant liver volume (RLV) to total liver volume (TLV) ratio (RLV/TLV) being <30% as safe in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs).

METHODS

Online databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2022. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

One prospective and seven retrospective studies comprising 1935 patients (164 RLV/TLV <30% vs. 1771 RLV/TLV ≥30%) were included. Overall (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002) and minor (OR = 1.88; 95% CI [1.23, 2.88]; p = .004) morbidities were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002). No significant differences were noted in the major morbidity, biliary complications, and hepatic dysfunction. Peak levels of bilirubin (SMD = .50; 95% CI [.07, .93]; p = .02) and international normalized ratio (SMD = .68; 95% CI [.04, 1.32]; p = .04) were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥ 30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group. No significant differences were noted in the peak alanine transferase and aspartate transaminase levels and hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the safety of the donor as the top priority, the eligibility of a potential liver donor in LDLT whose RLV/TLV is expected to be <30% should not be accepted.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在探讨活体肝移植(LDLT)中供肝残留肝体积(RLV)与总肝体积(TLV)的比值(RLV/TLV)<30%的可接受性是否安全。

方法

从 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月,在线数据库进行检索。使用固定效应或随机效应模型计算汇总比值比(OR)和标准化均数差(SMD)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共纳入 1 项前瞻性研究和 7 项回顾性研究,共纳入 1935 例患者(164 例 RLV/TLV<30%与 1771 例 RLV/TLV≥30%)。总体(OR=1.82;95%CI[1.24,2.67];p=0.002)和轻微(OR=1.88;95%CI[1.23,2.88];p=0.004)并发症发生率在 RLV/TLV≥30%组显著低于 RLV/TLV<30%组(OR=1.82;95%CI[1.24,2.67];p=0.002)。在主要并发症、胆漏和肝功能不全方面无显著差异。RLV/TLV≥30%组胆红素(SMD=0.50;95%CI[0.07,0.93];p=0.02)和国际标准化比值(SMD=0.68;95%CI[0.04,1.32];p=0.04)的峰值显著低于 RLV/TLV<30%组。RLV/TLV≥30%组的丙氨酸转氨酶和天冬氨酸转氨酶峰值水平和住院时间与 RLV/TLV<30%组无显著差异。

结论

鉴于供者安全是重中之重,对于预计 RLV/TLV 小于 30%的潜在肝移植供者,不应接受其作为肝移植供者的资格。

相似文献

1
Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.活体肝移植中供肝剩余体积小于 30%的供者安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Sep;37(9):e15080. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15080. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Clinical outcomes after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.ABO 不相容肝移植后的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transpl Immunol. 2021 Dec;69:101476. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101476. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
Methods to decrease blood loss during liver resection: a network meta-analysis.肝切除术中减少失血的方法:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 31;10(10):CD010683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010683.pub3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Clinically Related Factors of Liver Failure in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis After Hepatectomy.肝切除术后肝硬化患者肝衰竭的临床相关因素
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2025 Aug 1;35(4):e1387. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001387.
9
WITHDRAWN: Methods of vascular occlusion for elective liver resections.撤回:择期肝切除术中的血管闭塞方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD006409. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006409.pub3.
10
Methods of vascular occlusion for elective liver resections.选择性肝切除术中的血管阻断方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006409. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006409.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive deep learning-based assessment of living liver donor CT angiography: from vascular segmentation to volumetric analysis.基于深度学习的活体肝供体CT血管造影综合评估:从血管分割到容积分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6551-6557. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001829.
2
Clinical Factors Affecting the Rate of Liver Regeneration in Living Donors after Right Hepatectomy.影响活体供者右半肝切除术后肝脏再生速率的临床因素
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 26;14(5):458. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050458.
3
Older living liver donors can enlarge the donor pool: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
老年活体肝供者可扩大供者池:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):5022-5033. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001419.