Suppr超能文献

低危急性亚段肺栓塞成人中不抗凝监测的流行率和适宜性。

Prevalence of and Eligibility for Surveillance Without Anticoagulation Among Adults With Lower-Risk Acute Subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis Health, University of California, Davis, Sacramento.

The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2326898. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26898.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Approximately 8% of acute pulmonary emboli are confined to the subsegmental arteries. The 2016 and 2021 American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) guidelines and expert panel reports suggest the use of structured surveillance without anticoagulation for select ambulatory patients with subsegmental pulmonary embolism who do not have active cancer, deep vein thrombosis, impaired cardiopulmonary reserve, marked symptoms, or increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism; however, guideline uptake in community practice is unknown, as is the proportion of outpatients eligible for surveillance.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of surveillance among outpatients with acute subsegmental pulmonary embolism and to estimate the proportion of patients eligible for structured surveillance using modified CHEST criteria.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted across 21 US community hospitals in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California integrated health system from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. Adult outpatients with acute subsegmental pulmonary embolism were included. Patients with the following higher-risk characteristics were excluded: codiagnoses requiring hospitalization, non-low-risk vital signs (ie, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, pulse ≥110 bpm, or peripheral cutaneous pulse oximetry ≤92%), prediagnosis anticoagulant use, or hospice care. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to February 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were the (1) prevalence of surveillance and (2) eligibility for surveillance using 2 sets of criteria: the CHEST criteria modified by excluding patients with higher-risk characteristics or right ventricular dysfunction and a stricter set of criteria requiring age younger than 65 years and no more than 1 embolus. The prevalence of structured surveillance was calculated and the proportion of patients eligible for surveillance was estimated.

RESULTS

Of the 666 outpatients with acute subsegmental pulmonary embolism included in this study, 229 with lower-risk characteristics were examined. Their median age was 58 (IQR, 42-68) years; more than half were men (120 [52.4%]) and self-identified as non-Hispanic White (128 [55.9%]). Six patients (2.6%) were initially not treated with anticoagulants. Among the lower-risk cohort, only 1 patient (0.4% [95% CI, 0.01%-2.4%]) underwent structured surveillance, without 90-day sequelae. Thirty-five patients (15.3% of the lower-risk group and 5.3% of the full cohort) were surveillance eligible using modified CHEST criteria. Fifteen patients (6.6% of the lower-risk group and 2.3% of the full cohort) were surveillance eligible using stricter criteria.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of lower-risk outpatients with subsegmental pulmonary embolism, few were eligible for structured surveillance, and only a small proportion of eligible patients underwent surveillance despite the CHEST guideline. If forthcoming trials find surveillance safe and effective, substantial uptake into clinical practice may require more than passive diffusion.

摘要

重要性

大约有 8%的急性肺栓塞局限于亚段动脉。2016 年和 2021 年美国胸科医师学会(CHEST)指南和专家小组报告建议,对于没有活动性癌症、深静脉血栓形成、心肺储备受损、明显症状或静脉血栓栓塞复发风险增加的亚段性肺栓塞的选择门诊患者,在不抗凝的情况下进行有结构的监测;然而,社区实践中指南的采用情况尚不清楚,符合监测条件的门诊患者的比例也不清楚。

目的

描述急性亚段性肺栓塞门诊患者监测的流行情况,并使用改良的 CHEST 标准估计适合进行结构化监测的患者比例。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,在 Kaiser Permanente 北加州综合医疗系统的 21 家美国社区医院进行,时间为 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日。纳入急性亚段性肺栓塞的成年门诊患者。排除具有以下更高风险特征的患者:需要住院的合并诊断、非低风险生命体征(即收缩压<90mmHg、脉搏≥110bpm 或外周皮肤脉搏血氧饱和度≤92%)、预诊断抗凝治疗或临终关怀。数据分析于 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月进行。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是(1)监测的流行率和(2)使用 2 套标准的监测资格:一套是修改后的 CHEST 标准,排除了具有更高风险特征或右心室功能障碍的患者;另一套标准更严格,要求年龄小于 65 岁,且栓塞数不超过 1 个。计算了结构化监测的流行率,并估计了监测合格的患者比例。

结果

本研究共纳入 666 例急性亚段性肺栓塞门诊患者,其中 229 例具有较低风险特征。他们的中位年龄为 58(IQR,42-68)岁;超过一半为男性(120[52.4%]),自我认定为非西班牙裔白人(128[55.9%])。6 名患者(2.6%)最初未接受抗凝治疗。在低风险队列中,只有 1 名患者(0.4%[95%CI,0.01%-2.4%])接受了结构化监测,90 天内无后遗症。在 35 名患者(低风险组的 15.3%和全组的 5.3%)中,使用改良的 CHEST 标准符合监测标准。15 名患者(低风险组的 6.6%和全组的 2.3%)符合更严格的监测标准。

结论和相关性

在这项亚段性肺栓塞低风险门诊患者的队列研究中,很少有患者符合结构化监测条件,尽管 CHEST 指南建议,但只有一小部分符合条件的患者接受了监测。如果即将进行的试验发现监测是安全有效的,那么大量采用可能需要的不仅仅是被动传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef91/10398409/709bbf41e65f/jamanetwopen-e2326898-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验