Suppr超能文献

比较马里兰州新冠病毒替代护理中心(ACS)与常规医院住院医师士气。

Comparison of hospitalist morale in a COVID-19 alternate care site (ACS) to hospitalist morale in conventional hospitals in Maryland.

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Baltimore Convention Center Field Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0288981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288981. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Morale and burnout were concerns for hospitalists prior to the COVID-19 pandemic; these concerns were amplified as COVID-19 spread and hospitals experienced unprecedented stress. In contrast to prior literature, our study assesses both satisfaction and the importance of various factors. This study examines morale of hospitalists early in the COVID-19 pandemic in two settings: conventional hospitals and a COVID-19 Alternate Care site (ACS) in the same geographic region in Maryland. Multiple studies published early in the pandemic show low morale in COVID-19 hospitals.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional survey study, we analyze data from the Hospitalist Morale Index (HMI) administered between September 2020 and March 2021 to determine the pandemic's impact on hospitalist morale.

RESULTS

Surprisingly, our study found morale in the ACS was better than morale at the conventional hospitals. ACS hospitalists and conventional hospitalists were demographically similar. Our results show that a significantly higher proportion of conventional hospitalists reported burnout compared to the ACS hospitalists. General quality of life was rated significantly higher in the ACS group than the conventional group. Significantly more ACS hospitalists were invested in making their group outstanding. Five main HMI domains were examined with questions on a 5-point rating scale: Clinical Factors, Workload, Material Rewards, Leadership, and Appreciation/Acknowledgement. ACS hospitalists rated most measures higher than conventional hospitalists; largest differences were observed in Clinical Factors and Appreciation/Acknowledgement domains. Narrative comments from ACS hospitalists revealed strong identification with the mission of the ACS and pride in contributing during a crisis. One key difference between the two groups explains these findings: provider autonomy. The ACS staff chose the position and the assignment, while conventional hospitalists caring for COVID-19 patients could not readily opt out of this work.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that autonomy in assignments with risk has implications for morale and burnout.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行之前,医院医生就已经关注士气和倦怠问题;随着 COVID-19 的传播和医院经历前所未有的压力,这些问题更加严重。与之前的文献不同,我们的研究评估了满意度和各种因素的重要性。本研究在马里兰州同一地理区域的常规医院和 COVID-19 替代护理场所 (ACS) 两个环境中,评估 COVID-19 大流行早期医院医生的士气。早期发表的多项研究表明 COVID-19 医院士气低落。

方法

在一项横断面调查研究中,我们分析了 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 3 月间进行的医院医生士气指数 (HMI) 调查数据,以确定大流行对医院医生士气的影响。

结果

令人惊讶的是,我们的研究发现 ACS 的士气要好于常规医院。ACS 医院医生和常规医院医生在人口统计学方面相似。我们的研究结果表明,与 ACS 医院医生相比,常规医院医生中有更高比例的人报告倦怠。ACS 组的一般生活质量评分明显高于常规组。ACS 医院医生中有更多人致力于使自己的团队脱颖而出。使用 5 分制评估了五个主要 HMI 领域的问题:临床因素、工作量、物质奖励、领导力和赞赏/认可。ACS 医院医生对大多数指标的评分均高于常规医院医生;在临床因素和赞赏/认可领域的差异最大。ACS 医院医生的意见反映了他们对 ACS 使命的强烈认同,并为在危机期间做出贡献感到自豪。两组之间的一个关键区别解释了这些发现:提供者自主权。ACS 工作人员选择了职位和任务,而照顾 COVID-19 患者的常规医院医生则无法轻易选择退出这项工作。

结论

我们的数据表明,具有风险的任务自主权对士气和倦怠有影响。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验