• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inter-rating reliability of the Swiss easy-read integrated palliative care outcome scale for people with dementia.痴呆患者瑞士简易阅读综合姑息治疗结局量表的评定者间信度。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0286557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286557. eCollection 2023.
2
Improving caring quality for people with dementia in nursing homes using IPOS-Dem: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial protocol.采用 IPOS-Dem 提高养老院痴呆症患者护理质量:一项递进式窝块随机对照试验方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4234-4245. doi: 10.1111/jan.14953. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
3
Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for People with Dementia: easy language adaption and translation.痴呆症患者综合姑息治疗结果量表:简易语言改编与翻译
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Feb 15;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00420-7.
4
How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem.如何通过一种措施来改善养老院中痴呆症患者的症状和问题的评估和管理?IPOS-Dem 的一项混合方法可行性和过程评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0200240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200240. eCollection 2018.
5
Comparison between patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes: Validation of the Japanese version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for staff.患者报告结局与临床医生报告结局的比较:《综合姑息治疗结局量表》日语版对医护人员的效度验证
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Dec;19(6):702-708. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000018.
6
Translation and cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) to Swedish.《痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表》(IPOS-Dem)的瑞典语翻译及文化调适
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 2;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00859-5.
7
Validity and reliability of the English and translated Chinese versions of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in Singapore.新加坡综合姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的英文和中文翻译版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 9;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00737-y.
8
Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: reliability and content validity analysis.捷克综合姑息治疗结局量表的心理测量学特性:信度和内容效度分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 25;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00552-x.
9
Culture in the spotlight-cultural adaptation and content validity of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for dementia: A cognitive interview study.聚光灯下的文化——痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表的文化适应与内容效度:一项认知访谈研究
Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):962-971. doi: 10.1177/02692163211004403. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
10
Towards patient-centred cancer care: cross-cultural validity and responsiveness of the Turkish Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale.迈向以患者为中心的癌症护理:土耳其综合姑息治疗结局量表的跨文化有效性和反应性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 22;18(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01535-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Who's in the House? Staffing in Long-Term Care Homes Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic.谁在养老院?新冠疫情大流行之前及期间长期护理机构的人员配备情况。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 May 4;8:23337214221090803. doi: 10.1177/23337214221090803. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for People with Dementia: easy language adaption and translation.痴呆症患者综合姑息治疗结果量表:简易语言改编与翻译
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Feb 15;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00420-7.
3
Large differences in the organization of palliative care in nursing homes in six European countries: findings from the PACE cross-sectional study.六个欧洲国家养老院姑息治疗组织的巨大差异:PACE 横断面研究的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Aug 25;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00827-x.
4
Improving caring quality for people with dementia in nursing homes using IPOS-Dem: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial protocol.采用 IPOS-Dem 提高养老院痴呆症患者护理质量:一项递进式窝块随机对照试验方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4234-4245. doi: 10.1111/jan.14953. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
5
Culture in the spotlight-cultural adaptation and content validity of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for dementia: A cognitive interview study.聚光灯下的文化——痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表的文化适应与内容效度:一项认知访谈研究
Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):962-971. doi: 10.1177/02692163211004403. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
6
Interventions to foster family inclusion in nursing homes for people with dementia: a systematic review.促进痴呆患者养老院中家庭参与的干预措施:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 30;20(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01836-w.
7
Palliative Care in Advanced Dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 21;11:699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00699. eCollection 2020.
8
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.《痴呆症的预防、干预与照护:柳叶刀委员会2020年报告》
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
9
A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).一种简明的、针对晚期疾病患者及其代理人的结局测量工具:综合性姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的有效性、信度和反应度。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):1045-1057. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854264. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
10
The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions.全球严重健康相关痛苦负担不断加剧:按世界区域、年龄组和健康状况预测到 2060 年的情况。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jul;7(7):e883-e892. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30172-X. Epub 2019 May 22.

痴呆患者瑞士简易阅读综合姑息治疗结局量表的评定者间信度。

Inter-rating reliability of the Swiss easy-read integrated palliative care outcome scale for people with dementia.

机构信息

UNIL, Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare, Lausanne, Switzerland.

HES-So, School of Health Sciences Fribourg, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0286557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286557. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0286557
PMID:37531385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10395940/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with Dementia is a promising instrument for nursing home quality improvement and research in dementia care. It enables frontline staff in nursing homes to understand and rate the needs and concerns of people with dementia. We recently adapted the measure to include easy language for users from various educational backgrounds.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we examine the inter-rating reliability of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with Dementia for frontline staff in nursing homes.

METHODS

In this secondary analysis of an experimental study, 317 frontline staff members in 23 Swiss nursing homes assessed 240 people with dementia from a convenience sample. Reliability for individual items was computed using Fleiss Kappa. Because of the nested nature of the primary data, a generalisability and dependability study was performed for an experimental IPOS-Dem sum score.

RESULTS

The individual Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with Dementia items showed kappa values between .38 (95% CI .3-.48) and .15 (95% CI .08-.22). For the experimental IPOS-Dem sum score, a dependability index of .57 was found. The different ratings and time between ratings explain less than 2% of the variance in the sum score. The different nursing homes make up 12% and the people with dementia make up 43% of the sum score variance. The dependability study indicates that an experimental IPOS-Dem sum score could be acceptable for research by averaging two ratings.

CONCLUSION

Limited research has been conducted on the measurement error and reliability of patient-centred outcome measures for people with dementia who are living in nursing homes. The Swiss Easy-Read IPOS-Dem is a promising instrument but requires further improvement to be reliable for research or decision making. Future studies may look at its measurement properties for different rater populations or at different stages of dementia. Furthermore, there is a need to establish the construct validity and internal consistency of the easy-read IPOS-Dem.

摘要

背景

《痴呆患者综合姑息治疗结局量表》是一种很有前途的工具,可用于改善疗养院的护理质量和研究痴呆症护理。它使疗养院的一线工作人员能够了解和评估痴呆症患者的需求和关注点。我们最近对该量表进行了改编,使其更易于具有不同教育背景的用户使用。

目的

本研究旨在检验疗养院一线工作人员对《痴呆患者综合姑息治疗结局量表》的评分者间信度。

方法

在这项对一项实验研究的二次分析中,来自瑞士 23 家疗养院的 317 名一线工作人员从方便样本中评估了 240 名痴呆症患者。使用 Fleiss Kappa 计算个体项目的可靠性。由于原始数据的嵌套性质,对实验性 IPOS-Dem 总分进行了可推广性和可靠性研究。

结果

个体《痴呆患者综合姑息治疗结局量表》项目的 Kappa 值在 0.38(95%CI:0.3-0.48)至 0.15(95%CI:0.08-0.22)之间。对于实验性 IPOS-Dem 总分,发现可靠性指数为 0.57。评分和评分之间时间的不同仅解释了总分变异的小于 2%。不同的疗养院占总分变异的 12%,不同的痴呆症患者占总分变异的 43%。可靠性研究表明,通过平均两次评分,实验性 IPOS-Dem 总分可能适用于研究。

结论

针对居住在疗养院的痴呆症患者的以患者为中心的结局测量工具的测量误差和可靠性研究有限。瑞士易读版 IPOS-Dem 是一种很有前途的工具,但需要进一步改进,才能在研究或决策制定中可靠使用。未来的研究可能会针对不同的评分者群体或痴呆症的不同阶段,研究其测量特性。此外,需要确定易读版 IPOS-Dem 的构念效度和内部一致性。