• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚光灯下的文化——痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表的文化适应与内容效度:一项认知访谈研究

Culture in the spotlight-cultural adaptation and content validity of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for dementia: A cognitive interview study.

作者信息

Hodiamont Farina, Hock Helena, Ellis-Smith Clare, Evans Catherine, de Wolf-Linder Susanne, Jünger Saskia, Diehl-Schmid Janine, Burner-Fritsch Isabel, Bausewein Claudia

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):962-971. doi: 10.1177/02692163211004403. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1177/02692163211004403
PMID:33863246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8114430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dementia is a life-limiting disease with high symptom burden. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) is the first comprehensive person-centered measure to identify and measure palliative care needs of people with dementia. However, such a measure is missing in the German health care system.

AIM

To develop a culturally adapted German version of the IPOS-Dem and determine its content validity as a foundation for comprehensive psychometric testing.

DESIGN

Cognitive interview study with intermittent analysis and questionnaire adaptation. Interview guide and coding frame followed thematic analysis according to Willis complemented by Tourangeau's model of cognitive aspects of survey methodology: comprehension, retrieval, judgment, response.

PARTICIPANTS

Purposive sample with professionals ( = 29) and family carers ( = 6) of people with advanced dementia in seven nursing homes and person's own home care in four interview rounds ( = 11; 10; 7; 7).

RESULTS

IPOS-Dem was regarded as comprehensive and accessible. Cultural adaption pertained to issues of comprehension and judgment. Comprehension challenges referred to the person-centered concept of "being affected by" used in the POS-measures. Judgment problems related to persons with limited communication causing challenges in assessment.

CONCLUSION

Most issues of cultural adaptation could be addressed by questionnaire modifications. However, interviews unveiled fundamental challenges for using proxy reported person-centered assessments. Continuous training on how to use the instrument is imperative to integrate the person-centered approach of palliative care into nursing homes as a key provider of generalist palliative care for people with dementia. The refined version is ready for psychometric testing.

摘要

背景

痴呆症是一种会影响寿命且症状负担沉重的疾病。痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS-Dem)是首个以患者为中心的综合性工具,用于识别和衡量痴呆症患者的姑息治疗需求。然而,德国医疗体系中缺少这样一种工具。

目的

开发经过文化调适的德语版IPOS-Dem,并确定其内容效度,为全面的心理测量测试奠定基础。

设计

采用认知访谈研究,进行间歇分析和问卷调适。访谈指南和编码框架遵循威利斯提出的主题分析,并辅以图兰乔的调查方法认知方面模型:理解、检索、判断、回应。

参与者

采用目的抽样法,选取了来自七家养老院中晚期痴呆症患者的专业人员(n = 29)和家庭护理人员(n = 6),以及来自四家接受居家护理患者的人员,分四轮进行访谈(n = 11;10;7;7)。

结果

IPOS-Dem被认为具有全面性和易用性。文化调适涉及理解和判断方面的问题。理解方面的挑战涉及POS量表中使用的以患者为中心的“受影响”概念。判断问题与沟通能力有限的患者有关,这给评估带来了挑战。

结论

大多数文化调适问题可通过修改问卷来解决。然而,访谈揭示了使用代理报告的以患者为中心评估方法存在的根本挑战。必须持续开展关于如何使用该工具的培训,以便将姑息治疗的以患者为中心方法融入养老院,因为养老院是为痴呆症患者提供全科姑息治疗的主要机构。经过完善的版本已准备好进行心理测量测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a86/8114430/b8d6b4d49607/10.1177_02692163211004403-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a86/8114430/b8d6b4d49607/10.1177_02692163211004403-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a86/8114430/b8d6b4d49607/10.1177_02692163211004403-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Culture in the spotlight-cultural adaptation and content validity of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for dementia: A cognitive interview study.聚光灯下的文化——痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表的文化适应与内容效度:一项认知访谈研究
Palliat Med. 2021 May;35(5):962-971. doi: 10.1177/02692163211004403. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Translation and cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) to Swedish.《痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表》(IPOS-Dem)的瑞典语翻译及文化调适
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 2;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00859-5.
3
Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for People with Dementia: easy language adaption and translation.痴呆症患者综合姑息治疗结果量表:简易语言改编与翻译
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Feb 15;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00420-7.
4
Development of a caregiver-reported measure to support systematic assessment of people with dementia in long-term care: The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia.开发一种由照护者报告的测量工具,以支持对长期护理中的痴呆症患者进行系统评估:痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表。
Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;31(7):651-660. doi: 10.1177/0269216316675096. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
5
Translation and cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale including cognitive interviewing with patients and staff.整体舒缓治疗结局量表的翻译与文化调适:包括对患者和工作人员的认知访谈。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Sep 11;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0232-x.
6
Inter-rating reliability of the Swiss easy-read integrated palliative care outcome scale for people with dementia.痴呆患者瑞士简易阅读综合姑息治疗结局量表的评定者间信度。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0286557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286557. eCollection 2023.
7
How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem.如何通过一种措施来改善养老院中痴呆症患者的症状和问题的评估和管理?IPOS-Dem 的一项混合方法可行性和过程评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0200240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200240. eCollection 2018.
8
Translation and cognitive testing of the Italian Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS) among patients and healthcare professionals.意大利综合姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)在患者和医疗保健专业人员中的翻译和认知测试。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 2;14(1):e0208536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208536. eCollection 2019.
9
Towards patient-centred cancer care: cross-cultural validity and responsiveness of the Turkish Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale.迈向以患者为中心的癌症护理:土耳其综合姑息治疗结局量表的跨文化有效性和反应性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 22;18(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01535-5.
10
Improving caring quality for people with dementia in nursing homes using IPOS-Dem: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial protocol.采用 IPOS-Dem 提高养老院痴呆症患者护理质量:一项递进式窝块随机对照试验方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4234-4245. doi: 10.1111/jan.14953. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-cultural translation and linguistic validation of the eating motivation survey among older adults in the Chinese context.中国老年人饮食动机调查问卷的跨文化翻译与语言验证
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 30;12:1610598. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1610598. eCollection 2025.
2
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for Dementia.《痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表》的翻译及跨文化调适
Palliat Med. 2025 Sep;39(8):897-909. doi: 10.1177/02692163251347826. Epub 2025 Jul 13.
3
Internal consistency and structural validity of the Swiss easy-read Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with dementia: a secondary exploratory factor analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in the cultural adaptation of the German Myeloma Patient Outcome Scale (MyPOS): an outcome measure to support routine symptom assessment in myeloma care.德国多发性骨髓瘤患者结局量表(MyPOS)文化调适的挑战:一种支持多发性骨髓瘤护理常规症状评估的结局指标。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06730-7.
2
Relationships between the quality and nurses' and patient' characteristics: A cross-sectional study.质量与护士和患者特征之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2019 Nov 8;7(1):419-429. doi: 10.1002/nop2.405. eCollection 2020 Jan.
3
A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).
瑞士痴呆症患者简易阅读综合姑息治疗结果量表的内部一致性和结构效度:二次探索性因素分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 22;24(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01691-9.
4
Empowering informal caregivers and nurses to take a person-centred view: adaptation and clinical utility of the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS-Dem) for use in acute and community care settings.增强非正式照护者和护士以患者为中心的观念:综合姑息治疗结果量表(IPOS-Dem)在急性和社区护理环境中的适应性及临床效用
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):1030. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05608-8.
5
The e-cigarette assessment for youth-Revised (EAsY-R): Preliminary results of a pilot study of measure refinement via cognitive interviewing.电子香烟青少年评估修订版(EAsY-R):通过认知访谈进行测量细化的初步研究结果。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Sep;34(3):845-856. doi: 10.1111/jora.12957. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
6
Inter-rating reliability of the Swiss easy-read integrated palliative care outcome scale for people with dementia.痴呆患者瑞士简易阅读综合姑息治疗结局量表的评定者间信度。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0286557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286557. eCollection 2023.
7
Validation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for the oldest-old.高龄老人心理弹性量表中文版的效度验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1055301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1055301. eCollection 2023.
8
Level of Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Palliative Care for People with Advanced Dementia in Spain: Role of Professional and Academic Factors.西班牙晚期痴呆症患者对姑息治疗的认知水平和态度:专业及学术因素的作用
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2022;19(11):785-794. doi: 10.2174/1567205020666221221145259.
9
Translation and cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia (IPOS-Dem) to Swedish.《痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表》(IPOS-Dem)的瑞典语翻译及文化调适
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 2;21(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00859-5.
10
Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale for People with Dementia: easy language adaption and translation.痴呆症患者综合姑息治疗结果量表:简易语言改编与翻译
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Feb 15;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00420-7.
一种简明的、针对晚期疾病患者及其代理人的结局测量工具:综合性姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的有效性、信度和反应度。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):1045-1057. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854264. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
4
Facilitators and Barriers to Interdisciplinary Communication between Providers in Primary Care and Palliative Care.促进和阻碍初级保健与姑息治疗提供者之间跨学科交流的因素。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):243-249. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0231. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
5
Perspectives of patients, family caregivers and health professionals on the use of outcome measures in palliative care and lessons for implementation: a multi-method qualitative study.患者、家庭护理人员和卫生专业人员对姑息治疗中结局指标使用的看法及实施经验:一项多方法定性研究
Ann Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;7(Suppl 3):S137-S150. doi: 10.21037/apm.2018.09.02.
6
Recent Patterns of Multimorbidity Among Older Adults in High-Income Countries.高收入国家老年人多病共存的近期模式。
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Apr;22(2):127-137. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0069. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
7
How can a measure improve assessment and management of symptoms and concerns for people with dementia in care homes? A mixed-methods feasibility and process evaluation of IPOS-Dem.如何通过一种措施来改善养老院中痴呆症患者的症状和问题的评估和管理?IPOS-Dem 的一项混合方法可行性和过程评估。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0200240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200240. eCollection 2018.
8
Living and dying with advanced dementia: A prospective cohort study of symptoms, service use and care at the end of life.在晚期痴呆症中生活和死亡:一项关于症状、服务使用和生命末期护理的前瞻性队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;32(3):668-681. doi: 10.1177/0269216317726443. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Development of a caregiver-reported measure to support systematic assessment of people with dementia in long-term care: The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Dementia.开发一种由照护者报告的测量工具,以支持对长期护理中的痴呆症患者进行系统评估:痴呆症综合姑息治疗结果量表。
Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;31(7):651-660. doi: 10.1177/0269216316675096. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
10
Measures to assess commonly experienced symptoms for people with dementia in long-term care settings: a systematic review.长期护理机构中评估痴呆症患者常见症状的措施:一项系统综述
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 26;14:38. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0582-x.