• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于 COVID-19 大流行,医学教学方法发生变化。

Changes in the methodology of medical teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2023 Jul 31;21:eAO0101. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0101. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0101
PMID:37531475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10382074/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perceptions of students and teachers regarding remote teaching modality in comparison with the traditional face-to-face method.

METHODS

In this observational, retrospective, comparative, single-center study, questionnaires containing three major assessment domains were sent to two groups: university professors and undergraduate and graduate students. The first domain collected demographic and general data on the platforms used. The second and third domains contained questions that compared the perception of the quality of information offered by the two systems.

RESULTS

Between May and September 2020, 162 students and 71 teachers participated in the study. A greater proportion of students demonstrated previous contact with the online method, while professors had presented a greater number of courses. Most participants reported that their expectations regarding the remote teaching method were met (students, 80.3%; teachers, 94.4%). A significant number of students (83.3%) and teachers (88.7%) rated the classes as easier to attend and manage. Despite difficulties, such as concentration retention, most of the participants agree (at least partially) that the format should be maintained.

CONCLUSION

The remote teaching methodology, although still incipient in Brazil, has become a reality in light of current health restrictions. Our study demonstrated a high level of overall satisfaction and a high sense of learning from both students and faculty. However, new challenges associated with this system have been identified, such as retention of attention and interference from the external environment. Longitudinal comparative studies that incorporate various aspects of medical education in all cycles are necessary to corroborate the findings of this study.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study, level III evidence.

摘要

目的

评估学生和教师对远程教学模式的看法,与传统的面对面教学方法进行比较。

方法

在这项观察性、回顾性、对比性、单中心研究中,我们向两组人员(大学教授和本科生及研究生)发送了包含三个主要评估领域的问卷。第一个领域收集了有关使用平台的人口统计学和一般数据。第二和第三个领域包含了比较两种系统提供的信息质量的感知问题。

结果

2020 年 5 月至 9 月期间,有 162 名学生和 71 名教师参与了这项研究。更多的学生表示之前接触过在线教学方法,而教授则开设了更多的课程。大多数参与者表示,他们对远程教学方法的期望得到了满足(学生,80.3%;教师,94.4%)。相当数量的学生(83.3%)和教师(88.7%)认为课程更容易参加和管理。尽管存在注意力保持等困难,但大多数参与者(至少部分同意)认为应该保持这种教学形式。

结论

远程教学方法虽然在巴西仍处于起步阶段,但由于目前的健康限制,它已经成为现实。我们的研究表明,学生和教师都对整体满意度和学习感都很高。然而,也发现了与这种系统相关的新挑战,例如注意力的保持和外部环境的干扰。需要进行包含医学教育各个方面的长期比较研究,以证实本研究的结果。

设计

回顾性对比研究,III 级证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a56/10382074/09a39d3a6ffc/2317-6385-eins-21-eAO0101-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a56/10382074/09a39d3a6ffc/2317-6385-eins-21-eAO0101-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a56/10382074/09a39d3a6ffc/2317-6385-eins-21-eAO0101-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Changes in the methodology of medical teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic.由于 COVID-19 大流行,医学教学方法发生变化。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2023 Jul 31;21:eAO0101. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0101. eCollection 2023.
2
How far has the digitization of medical teaching progressed in times of COVID-19? A multinational survey among medical students and lecturers in German-speaking central Europe.在 COVID-19 时代,医学教学的数字化进程进展如何?一项针对德语区中欧医学生和讲师的跨国调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 20;22(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03470-z.
3
Barriers and facilitators to online medical and nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives from international students from low- and middle-income countries and their teaching staff.新冠疫情期间在线医学与护理教育的障碍及促进因素:来自低收入和中等收入国家的国际学生及其教师的观点
Hum Resour Health. 2021 May 12;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00609-9.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning in health professional education: a mixed methods study protocol.COVID-19 大流行对健康专业教育中教学的影响:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 19;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02871-w.
5
Perception of learning by anatomy teachers in the COVID-19.COVID-19 期间解剖学教师对学习的认知
Morphologie. 2024 Mar;108(360):100727. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2023.100727. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
6
Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching.学习者和教师对 COVID-19 大流行期间医学教育的看法:在线教学的横断面调查。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1919042. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1919042.
7
[Impact of Nurse Practitioners and Nursing Education on COVID-19 Pandemics: Innovative Strategies of Authentic Technology-Integrated Clinical Simulation].[执业护士及护理教育对COVID-19大流行的影响:真实技术整合临床模拟的创新策略]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2021 Oct;68(5):4-6. doi: 10.6224/JN.202110_68(5).01.
8
Online education at the medical School of Tongji University during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间同济大学医学院的在线教育:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 28;21(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02951-x.
9
Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students.COVID-19 大流行期间医学生对在线教学的看法:对 2721 名英国医学生的全国横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e042378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378.
10
Remote Pathology teaching under the COVID-19 pandemic: Medical students' perceptions.COVID-19 大流行下的远程病理学教学:医学生的看法。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2022 Feb;56:151875. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2021.151875. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Twelve tips for teaching medical students online under COVID-19.新冠疫情期间在线教授医学生的 12 个技巧
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1854066. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1854066.
2
Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在线学习是否优于本科医学教育中的离线学习?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1666538. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538.
3
Development of an Instructional Design Evaluation Survey for Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Content Validation Study.
研究生医学电子学习教学设计评估调查的开发:内容效度研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 9;21(8):e13921. doi: 10.2196/13921.
4
Health Professions' Digital Education: Review of Learning Theories in Randomized Controlled Trials by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.卫生专业的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织对随机对照试验中学习理论的综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 12;21(3):e12912. doi: 10.2196/12912.
5
A cross-sectional study to assess Evidence-Based Medicine teaching method: online or face-to-face?一项评估循证医学教学方法的横断面研究:在线还是面对面?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Apr;24(2):59-62. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111117. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
6
Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education.传统与强化在线研究生健康专业教育项目学生成果比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1343-7.
7
Student Evaluation of Distance Learning for Health Care Professionals.
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jun;25(6):485-491. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0065. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
The flipped classroom allows for more class time devoted to critical thinking.翻转课堂能让更多课堂时间用于批判性思维。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Dec 1;40(4):522-528. doi: 10.1152/advan.00033.2016.
9
What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review.我们在医学教育中基于计算机的学习干预措施中寻求什么?一项系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 1;18(8):e204. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5461.
10
Using student satisfaction data to evaluate a new online accelerated nursing education program.利用学生满意度数据评估一项新的在线加速护理教育项目。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Oct;58:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 27.