Suppr超能文献

理解儿童健康相关生活质量的评估:一项定性研究方案。

Understanding the valuation of paediatric health-related quality of life: a qualitative study protocol.

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 2;13(8):e073039. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073039.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is evidence from previous studies that adults value paediatric health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adult HRQoL differently. Less is known about how adolescents value paediatric HRQoL and whether their valuation and decision-making processes differ from those of adults. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are widely used to develop value sets for measures of HRQoL, but there is still much to understand about whether and how the methods choices in the implementation of DCE valuation tasks, such as format, presentation and perspective, affect the decision-making process of participants. This paper describes the protocol for a qualitative study that aims to explore the decision-making process of adults and adolescents when completing DCE valuation tasks. The study will also explore the impact of methodological choices in the design of DCE studies (including decisions about format and presentation) on participants' thinking process.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An interview protocol has been developed using DCE valuation tasks. Interviews will be conducted online via Zoom with both an adolescent and adult sample. In the interview, the participant will be asked to go through some DCE valuation tasks while 'thinking aloud'. After completion of the survey, participants will then be asked some predetermined questions in relation to various aspects of the DCE tasks. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval for this study has been received for the adult sample (UTS ETH20-9632) as well as the youth sample (UTS ETH22-6970) from the University of Technology Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee. Results from this study will inform the methods to be used in development of value sets for use in the health technology assessment of paediatric interventions and treatments. Findings from this study will also be disseminated through national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals.

摘要

简介

先前的研究表明,成年人重视儿童健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和成人 HRQoL,但对于青少年如何重视儿童 HRQoL以及他们的评估和决策过程是否与成年人不同,了解较少。离散选择实验(DCE)被广泛用于开发 HRQoL 测量的价值集,但对于实施 DCE 评估任务时的方法选择(例如格式、呈现和视角)是否以及如何影响参与者的决策过程,仍有很多需要了解。本文描述了一项定性研究的方案,该研究旨在探讨成年人和青少年在完成 DCE 评估任务时的决策过程。该研究还将探讨 DCE 研究设计中的方法选择(包括格式和呈现决策)对参与者思维过程的影响。

方法和分析

本研究使用 DCE 评估任务制定了访谈方案。将通过 Zoom 在线对青少年和成年人样本进行访谈。在访谈中,将要求参与者在“边想边说”的情况下完成一些 DCE 评估任务。完成调查后,将向参与者提出与 DCE 任务的各个方面有关的一些预定问题。访谈将进行录音和转录,并使用主题分析方法进行分析。

伦理和传播

本研究已获得悉尼科技大学人类研究伦理委员会对成人样本(UTS ETH20-9632)和青少年样本(UTS ETH22-6970)的伦理批准。本研究的结果将为开发用于儿科干预和治疗的健康技术评估的价值集所使用的方法提供信息。本研究的结果还将通过全国/国际会议和同行评议期刊传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3866/10401228/52e19173b674/bmjopen-2023-073039f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验