Suppr超能文献

《健康成年和青少年志愿者参与预防性疫苗临床试验的毒性分级标准》的严格性评价综述。

A review of criteria strictness in "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials".

机构信息

Center for Translational Research, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Center for Translational Research, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Advanced Medicine Promotion, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2023 Aug 31;41(38):5622-5629. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.072. Epub 2023 Aug 1.

Abstract

To assess safety in vaccine development, stricter grading scales, such as the "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials" issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA grading scale), are required. However, concern exists that their strictness may lead to an overestimation of some adverse events (AEs). We analyzed the details of AEs in a phase I clinical trial of a preventive vaccine for infectious diseases. In this trial, we observed the high occurrence of Grade 1 or greater AEs in hemoglobin changes from baseline value, and hypernatremia, and hypokalemia by FDA grading scale. The range considered as non-AE according to the FDA grading scale shifted or became narrower when compared to reference intervals, especially for a Japanese cohort. For sodium grading, the criterion for hypernatremia was around 2 to mEq/L lower than the upper limit of most standards in several countries. Also, the criterion for hypokalemia was around 0.2 mEq/L higher than the lower limit of most standards. Regarding a decrease in hemoglobin from baseline, the criterion of "any decrease" used for a Grade 1 AE was too strict and we suggest this be omitted. Upper and lower limits of AE criteria for sodium and potassium should be equal to, or 10-20% above, the reference interval consistent with other toxicities determined by laboratory tests. Consideration should be given to the issues surrounding the criteria that determine AEs before conducting clinical trials.

摘要

为了评估疫苗开发的安全性,需要更严格的分级标准,例如美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)发布的“健康成年和青少年志愿者参加预防性疫苗临床试验的毒性分级标准”。然而,人们担心这种严格性可能导致对某些不良事件(AE)的高估。我们分析了传染病预防疫苗的 I 期临床试验中 AE 的细节。在这项试验中,我们观察到根据 FDA 分级标准,血红蛋白从基线值变化、高钠血症和低钾血症的 1 级或更高级别的 AE 发生率较高。与参考区间相比,根据 FDA 分级标准考虑的非 AE 范围发生了变化或变窄,尤其是对于日本队列。对于钠分级,高钠血症的标准比大多数国家的标准上限低约 2 至 mEq/L。此外,低钾血症的标准比大多数标准的下限高约 0.2 mEq/L。关于血红蛋白从基线下降,用于 1 级 AE 的“任何下降”标准过于严格,我们建议将其删除。钠和钾的 AE 标准的上限和下限应等于或比实验室检查确定的其他毒性的参考区间高 10-20%。在进行临床试验之前,应考虑与确定 AE 的标准相关的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验