Suppr超能文献

一项开放性标签随机试验,旨在评估IntegriMedical®无针注射系统与传统针剂系统在健康志愿者中使用生理盐水作为安慰剂时的安全性、耐受性和可接受性。

A Pilot Open-Label Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Acceptability of the IntegriMedical® Needle Free Injection System versus a Conventional Needle-Based System in Healthy Volunteers, Using Normal Saline as a Placebo.

作者信息

Pathan Almas, Shetty Narasimha Kavitha, Naik Ankur, Ranade Arati

机构信息

Jehangir Clinical Development Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

IntegriMedical Private Limited, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Med Devices (Auckl). 2024 Dec 27;17:525-536. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S491883. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of the IntegriMedical® Needle Free Injection System (IM-NFIS) compared to conventional hypodermic needle injections (CHN) in healthy adult subjects across multiple injection sites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty healthy male subjects aged 18-45 years were enrolled in this open-label study. Each subject received both NF and CHN injections at five different sites (forearm, abdomen, thigh, buttocks, and arm). In the study, participants in the forearm cohort received 0.1 mL of saline, whereas, for all other injection sites, 0.5 mL of saline was administered. Both needle-free and hypodermic needle injections were used at the designated sites, with a 5- to 10-minute interval between each injection. Since no active drug was used, saline served as a placebo in both methods. Safety assessments included local and systemic reactions, pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and acceptability questionnaires. The study adhered to ethical guidelines and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.

RESULTS

NF injections demonstrated significantly lower pain scores compared to CHN injections (mean VAS score 0.23 vs 1.07, p < 0.01). Local site reactions were minimal and similar between NF and CHN injections, with no significant differences observed at 20-30 minutes post-injection. Systemic reactions were absent in both groups throughout the study period. The NF injection system was highly acceptable, with a majority of subjects reporting reduced anxiety and pain compared to CHN injections (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

IM-NFIS proved to be safe, well tolerated, and highly acceptable for delivering pharmaceuticals compared to conventional needle and syringe injections. This needle-free technology offers potential advantages in improving patient compliance and reducing injection-related anxieties, suggesting its promising role in future medical practices, including pediatric vaccinations and frequent medication administration.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估IntegriMedical®无针注射系统(IM-NFIS)与传统皮下注射针(CHN)相比,在健康成年受试者多个注射部位的安全性、耐受性和可接受性。

患者与方法

30名年龄在18至45岁之间的健康男性受试者参与了这项开放标签研究。每个受试者在五个不同部位(前臂、腹部、大腿、臀部和手臂)接受了无针和传统皮下注射针注射。在研究中,前臂组的参与者接受了0.1 mL生理盐水注射,而在所有其他注射部位,注射了0.5 mL生理盐水。在指定部位使用了无针注射和皮下注射针注射,每次注射间隔5至10分钟。由于未使用活性药物,生理盐水在两种方法中均用作安慰剂。安全性评估包括局部和全身反应、使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)的疼痛评分以及可接受性问卷。该研究遵循伦理准则,并获得了机构伦理委员会的批准。

结果

与传统皮下注射针注射相比,无针注射的疼痛评分显著更低(平均VAS评分为0.23对1.07,p < 0.01)。局部部位反应轻微,无针注射和传统皮下注射针注射之间相似,注射后20至30分钟未观察到显著差异。在整个研究期间,两组均未出现全身反应。无针注射系统具有高度可接受性,与传统皮下注射针注射相比,大多数受试者报告焦虑和疼痛减轻(p < 0.01)。

结论

与传统的针头和注射器注射相比,IM-NFIS被证明在给药方面是安全、耐受性良好且高度可接受的。这种无针技术在提高患者依从性和减少注射相关焦虑方面具有潜在优势,表明其在未来医疗实践中,包括儿科疫苗接种和频繁给药方面具有广阔前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe3/11687312/72db5565d23a/MDER-17-525-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验