• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症幸存者健康相关生命质量测评工具的心理计量学特性:系统综述。

Psychometric properties of health-related quality of life instruments used in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review.

机构信息

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2024 Jan;33(1):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03487-x. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-023-03487-x
PMID:37532887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784337/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a patient-reported measure of health status. However, research on the psychometric properties of HRQoL instruments used post-critical care is less common. We conducted a systematic review assessing the psychometric properties of HRQoL instruments used in adult survivors following critical illness.

METHODS

Three databases were systematically searched between 1990 and June 2022. Screening articles for eligibility, we selected either development studies for new tools or studies that evaluated psychometric properties, and whose target population represented adult survivors following critical illness. Methodological quality was assessed using the COnsensus-Based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. The results of each psychometric property were then assessed for criteria of good psychometric properties (sufficient, insufficient or indeterminate) and qualitatively summarised. Finally, we graded the quality of the evidence using a modified GRADE approach.

RESULTS

We retrieved 13 eligible studies from 2,983 records identifying 10 HRQoL instruments used post-critical illness. While high-quality evidence for the considered PROMs was limited primarily due to risk of bias, seven instruments demonstrated sufficient levels of reliability, four instruments presented sufficient hypothesis testing, and two instruments showed sufficient responsiveness. Except the Short Form-36, evidence for psychometric properties of other individual measures was limited to a few studies.

CONCLUSION

There was limited evidence demonstrated for the psychometric properties of the included PROMs evaluating HRQoL. Further research is warranted to evaluate the psychometric properties of HRQoL measures, strengthening the evidence for administering these instruments in survivors following critical illness.

摘要

背景与目的

健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)是一种患者报告的健康状况衡量标准。然而,针对重症监护后使用的 HRQoL 工具的心理测量学特性的研究则相对较少。我们进行了一项系统综述,评估了用于重症后成年幸存者的 HRQoL 工具的心理测量学特性。

方法

我们于 1990 年至 2022 年 6 月期间系统地检索了三个数据库。通过筛选文章以确定其是否符合纳入标准,我们选择了新工具的开发研究或评估心理测量学特性的研究,且其目标人群为重症后成年幸存者。使用共识基础的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单评估方法学质量。然后,我们根据良好心理测量学特性的标准(充分、不充分或不确定)评估每个心理测量特性的结果,并进行定性总结。最后,我们使用改良的 GRADE 方法对证据质量进行分级。

结果

我们从 2983 条记录中检索到 13 项符合纳入标准的研究,确定了 10 种用于重症后患者的 HRQoL 工具。由于存在偏倚风险,主要考虑的 PROM 工具的高质量证据有限,但有 7 种工具的可靠性达到了充分水平,4 种工具的假设检验达到了充分水平,2 种工具的反应度达到了充分水平。除了简短表单-36 外,其他个别测量工具的心理测量特性证据仅限于少数研究。

结论

纳入的用于评估 HRQoL 的 PROM 工具的心理测量学特性的证据有限。需要进一步研究来评估 HRQoL 测量工具的心理测量学特性,以加强在重症后幸存者中使用这些工具的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e793/10784337/99e27bdadfcc/11136_2023_3487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e793/10784337/99e27bdadfcc/11136_2023_3487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e793/10784337/99e27bdadfcc/11136_2023_3487_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of health-related quality of life instruments used in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review.重症幸存者健康相关生命质量测评工具的心理计量学特性:系统综述。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jan;33(1):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03487-x. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
Measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments for people living with scoliosis in China: A systematic review.中国脊柱侧弯患者健康相关生活质量量表的测量属性:一项系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0325382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325382. eCollection 2025.
5
HIV-Specific Reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.HIV 特异性报告结局指标:心理计量学特性的系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Dec 8;8(12):e39015. doi: 10.2196/39015.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Psychometric properties of measurement tools of active aging: A systematic review.积极老龄化测量工具的心理测量学特性:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Jan;137:104388. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104388. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
8
A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors.一项系统评价发现,关于测量成年重症监护病房幸存者结局的工具的测量特性的数据有限。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in maternal postpartum anxiety.系统评价用于产妇产后焦虑的患者报告结局测量指标。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Sep;5(9):101076. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101076. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
10
Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.评价成人脊柱侧弯生活质量的评估方法:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Spine Deform. 2022 Sep;10(5):991-1002. doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00498-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of updated population norms for the SF-36 for Hungary and comparison with 1997-1998 norms.匈牙利SF-36更新版人群常模的制定及与1997 - 1998年常模的比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Feb 17;23(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02343-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of hospital survivors following an ICU stay: A multi-centre retrospective cohort study.ICU 住院后医院幸存者的长期结局:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 28;17(3):e0266038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266038. eCollection 2022.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Long-term health-related quality of life and burden of disease after intensive care: development of a patient-reported outcome measure.
长期重症监护后的健康相关生活质量和疾病负担:患者报告结局测量工具的开发。
Crit Care. 2021 Feb 25;25(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03496-7.
4
Prevalence of post-intensive care syndrome among Japanese intensive care unit patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational J-PICS study.日本重症监护病房患者 ICU 后综合征的患病率:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性 J-PICS 研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Feb 16;25(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03501-z.
5
Core outcomes sets for studies evaluating critical illness and patient recovery.评估危重病和患者康复的研究的核心结局集。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020 Oct;26(5):489-499. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000750.
6
The Effect of ICU Diaries on Psychological Outcomes and Quality of Life of Survivors of Critical Illness and Their Relatives: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.《重症加强治疗病房日记对危重症幸存者及其亲属心理结局和生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析》
Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):273-279. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003547.
7
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
8
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
9
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
10
A systematic review finds limited data on measurement properties of instruments measuring outcomes in adult intensive care unit survivors.一项系统评价发现,关于测量成年重症监护病房幸存者结局的工具的测量特性的数据有限。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;82:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Nov 16.