• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物制剂随机对照试验中注射部位反应的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Injection Site Reactions in Randomized-Controlled Trials of Biologic Injections.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

J Cutan Med Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(4):358-367. doi: 10.1177/12034754231188444. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1177/12034754231188444
PMID:37533141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10486173/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biologic agents are emerging as an important treatment option for immune-mediated diseases. Injection site reactions following subcutaneous injection of biologic agents is not well described in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize injection site reaction data in phase 3 trials of all biologic agents.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched on February 8, 2022. Proportional meta-analysis was conducted to summarize injection site reaction prevalence for each biologic.

RESULTS

There were 158 articles included in the review. The most common types of injection site reactions were erythema (42.8%), unspecified reaction (23.3%), pain (12.4%), and pruritus (5.7%). No patients discontinued their treatment due to injection site reactions in 39 of the 48 studies that reported on discontinuation data. There were 16 biologics included in meta-analysis across 80 eligible studies. The biologics with the highest point prevalence of patients reporting injection site reactions were Canakinumab (15.5%; 294 patients), Dupilumab (11.4%; 1888 patients), Etanercept (11.4%; 4363 patients), and Ixekizumab (11.2%; 2205 patients). The biologics with the lowest point prevalence of injection site reactions were Risankizumab (0.8%; 707 patients), Brodalumab (1.3%; 1365 patients), Guselkumab (1.3%; 1852 patients), Secukinumab (1.9%; 1277 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of injection site reaction in response to biologics ranges from 0.08 to 15.5%. Canakinumab, Dupilumab, Etanercept, and Ixekizumab had the highest prevalence of injection site reactions. Risankizumab, Brodalumab, Guselkumab, and Secukinumab had the lowest prevalence of injection site reactions. Recommendations are made regarding the improvement of adverse event reporting to better understand the epidemiology of injection site reactions.

摘要

背景

生物制剂作为治疗免疫介导性疾病的重要手段正在不断涌现。然而,生物制剂皮下注射后的注射部位反应在文献中描述得并不充分。

目的

总结所有生物制剂 3 期临床试验中的注射部位反应数据。

方法

于 2022 年 2 月 8 日系统性检索 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 数据库。采用比例荟萃分析汇总每种生物制剂的注射部位反应发生率。

结果

共纳入 158 篇文章。最常见的注射部位反应类型包括红斑(42.8%)、未特指反应(23.3%)、疼痛(12.4%)和瘙痒(5.7%)。在报告停药数据的 48 项研究中,有 39 项研究无患者因注射部位反应而停药。在纳入 80 项合格研究的 16 项生物制剂的荟萃分析中,报告注射部位反应的患者比例最高的生物制剂依次为康纳单抗(15.5%,294 例)、度普利尤单抗(11.4%,1888 例)、依那西普(11.4%,4363 例)和依奇珠单抗(11.2%,2205 例)。注射部位反应发生率最低的生物制剂依次为里沙鲁单抗(0.8%,707 例)、布罗达单抗(1.3%,1365 例)、古塞库单抗(1.3%,1852 例)、司库奇尤单抗(1.9%,1277 例)。

结论

生物制剂治疗引起的注射部位反应发生率为 0.08%~15.5%。康纳单抗、度普利尤单抗、依那西普和依奇珠单抗的注射部位反应发生率最高,里沙鲁单抗、布罗达单抗、古塞库单抗和司库奇尤单抗的发生率最低。我们建议改进不良事件报告,以更好地了解注射部位反应的流行病学情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/368f92360b61/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/0032229142f5/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/91a30e79a6f7/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/421a825452ce/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/3fa1fa3fb731/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/db4b643b9627/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/368f92360b61/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/0032229142f5/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/91a30e79a6f7/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/421a825452ce/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/3fa1fa3fb731/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/db4b643b9627/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b865/10486173/368f92360b61/10.1177_12034754231188444-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Injection Site Reactions in Randomized-Controlled Trials of Biologic Injections.生物制剂随机对照试验中注射部位反应的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(4):358-367. doi: 10.1177/12034754231188444. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
3
Injection site reactions resulting from the use of biological therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.生物疗法治疗中重度斑块状银屑病引起的注射部位反应。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024 Sep;23(9):1115-1126. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2392007. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
4
Number Needed to Treat Network Meta-Analysis to Compare Biologic Drugs for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.比较中重度银屑病生物制剂的网络荟萃分析所需治疗人数
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):2256-2269. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02065-w. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
5
Short-term effectiveness of biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂治疗中重度斑块状银屑病患者的短期疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Dermatol Sci. 2020 Jul;99(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Formation and clinical effects of anti-drug antibodies against biologics in psoriasis treatment: An analysis of current evidence.治疗银屑病中生物制剂的抗药物抗体的形成和临床影响:对当前证据的分析。
Autoimmun Rev. 2024 Apr;23(4):103530. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103530. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
7
Assessing the 5-year persistence in positive clinical response with innovative psoriasis treatments: a network meta-analysis of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score.评估创新型银屑病治疗方案的 5 年持续临床应答率:基于银屑病面积和严重程度指数评分的网络荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2024 Sep 18;49(10):1148-1155. doi: 10.1093/ced/llae131.
8
Drug Survival of Interleukin (IL)‑17 and IL‑23 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Psoriasis: A Retrospective Multi‑country, Multicentric Cohort Study.药物生存分析:白细胞介素(IL)-17 和 IL-23 抑制剂治疗银屑病的回顾性多国、多中心队列研究。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022 Nov;23(6):891-904. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00722-y. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
Comparative Efficacy and Relative Ranking of Biologics and Oral Therapies for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-analysis.生物制剂与口服疗法治疗中重度斑块状银屑病的疗效比较及相对排名:一项网状Meta分析
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Jun;11(3):885-905. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00511-1. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
10
Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 Inhibitors Brodalumab, Secukinumab, Ixekizumab, Ustekinumab, Guselkumab, Tildrakizumab, and Risankizumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.短期疗效和安全性的白介素-17、白介素-12/23 和白介素-23 抑制剂布罗达单抗、司库奇尤单抗、依奇珠单抗、乌司奴单抗、古塞库单抗、替西珠单抗和瑞莎珠单抗治疗中度至重度斑块状银屑病:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Immunol Res. 2019 Sep 10;2019:2546161. doi: 10.1155/2019/2546161. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Minipigs as a Non-clinical Model for Screening and Derisking Injection Site Reactions in Clinical Trials.评估小型猪作为临床试验中筛选和降低注射部位反应风险的非临床模型。
Pharm Res. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s11095-025-03907-2.
2
Marstacimab for the Treatment of Hemophilia A or B.玛斯塔西单抗用于治疗甲型或乙型血友病。
Biologics. 2025 Jun 24;19:379-386. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S500480. eCollection 2025.
3
Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, in Healthy Subjects.

本文引用的文献

1
Ixekizumab Citrate-Free Formulation: Results from Two Clinical Trials.依奇珠单抗无枸橼酸盐配方:两项临床试验结果。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2862-2872. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02126-0. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence.在不同类型的系统评价中进行比例荟萃分析:证据综合者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Sep 20;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01381-z.
3
Bimekizumab versus Secukinumab in Plaque Psoriasis.比美吉珠单抗与司库奇尤单抗治疗斑块状银屑病的疗效比较。
铁调素模拟物皮下注射鲁司非肽在健康受试者中的多剂量药代动力学、药效学、安全性及耐受性研究
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025 Apr;14(4):311-323. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1514. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
4
Demographics, Disease Characteristics, and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Biological Drugs: The Experience of a Single-Centre Study in Poland.接受生物药物治疗的斑块状银屑病患者的人口统计学、疾病特征及治疗模式:波兰一项单中心研究的经验
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 16;13(24):7647. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247647.
5
Patient self-reported experience and satisfaction with golimumab and etanercept treatments for rheumatic diseases: A cohort study.患者对治疗风湿性疾病的戈利木单抗和依那西普治疗的自我报告体验和满意度:一项队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 23;103(8):e36982. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036982.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 8;385(2):142-152. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102383. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Injection Site Reactions in the Federal Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Post-Marketing Database Vary Among Biologics Approved to Treat Moderate-To-Severe Psoriasis.在联邦不良事件报告系统(FAERS)上市后数据库中,获批用于治疗中度至重度银屑病的生物制剂的注射部位反应存在差异。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Feb;10(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s13555-019-00341-2. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
6
Analysis and reporting of adverse events in randomised controlled trials: a review.随机对照试验中不良事件的分析和报告:综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):e024537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024537.
7
Injection site reactions with the use of biological agents.生物制剂使用中的注射部位反应。
Dermatol Ther. 2019 Mar;32(2):e12817. doi: 10.1111/dth.12817. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
8
Safety and Tolerability of Ixekizumab: Integrated Analysis of Injection-Site Reactions from 11 Clinical Trials.司库奇尤单抗的安全性和耐受性:来自11项临床试验的注射部位反应综合分析。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Feb 1;17(2):200-206.
9
Biologics in Inflammatory Immune-mediated Systemic Diseases.炎症性免疫介导的全身性疾病中的生物制剂
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2017;18(12):1008-1016. doi: 10.2174/1389201019666171226152448.
10
Second-line biologic therapy optimization in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎二线生物制剂治疗的优化。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Oct;47(2):183-192. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 22.