Zaki Hany A, Hamdi Alkahlout Baha, Basharat Kaleem, Elsayed Wael Abdelrehem Elnabawy, Abdelrahim Mohammed Gafar, Al-Marri Nood Dhafi R, Masood Maarij, Shaban Eman
Emergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Cardiology, Al Jufairi Diagnosis and Treatment, Doha, QAT.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 1;15(7):e41268. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41268. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a condition often seen in patients diagnosed with cancer and is recognized as a predictor of poor outcomes in these patients. The probability of VTE recurring is generally higher in people with cancer than in those without; hence, addressing this issue is essential when making healthcare decisions. Therefore, our systematic review was primarily designed to compare low-weight- molecular heparin (LMWH) to warfarin in reducing recurrent VTE among cancer patients. However, other outcomes were also evaluated, such as mortality and bleeding events observed more in cancer patients. The selection of relevant articles was carried out using a database search and a manual search, which involved reviewing reference lists of articles eligible for inclusion in the current review. The methodological quality of each included study was then assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool in the Review Manager software (RevMan 5.4.1). Additionally, pooled results were examined using the Review Manager software and presented as forest plots. Our search of electronic databases elicited a total of 2163 articles, of which only six were deemed eligible for inclusion and analysis. Data pooled from the six studies demonstrated the effectiveness of LMWH in minimizing the reoccurrence of VTE over warfarin [risk ratio (RR): 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47 - 0.95; p = 0.03]. However, LMWH had a similar effect statistically as warfarin on the major bleeding events (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.62 - 1.77; p = 0.85), minor bleeding events (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.54 - 1.20; p = 0.28), and all-cause mortality (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.88 - 1.13; p = 0.99). While LMWH demonstrated its effectiveness in minimizing the incidence of VTE recurrence over warfarin in cancer patients, it had no statistical difference in terms of mortality or bleeding events when compared to warfarin. Based on our findings, we recommend that LMWH continues to be used as a first-line treatment regimen to mitigate recurrent VTE in cancer patients.
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是癌症患者中常见的病症,被认为是这些患者预后不良的一个预测指标。癌症患者发生VTE复发的概率通常高于非癌症患者;因此,在做出医疗决策时解决这个问题至关重要。因此,我们的系统评价主要旨在比较低分子量肝素(LMWH)与华法林在降低癌症患者VTE复发方面的效果。然而,我们也评估了其他结果,如癌症患者中更常见的死亡率和出血事件。通过数据库检索和手动检索来选择相关文章,手动检索包括查阅符合纳入本评价标准的文章的参考文献列表。然后使用Review Manager软件(RevMan 5.4.1)中的Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估每项纳入研究的方法学质量。此外,使用Review Manager软件检查汇总结果并以森林图形式呈现。我们对电子数据库的检索共得到2163篇文章,其中只有6篇被认为符合纳入和分析标准。六项研究汇总的数据表明,与华法林相比,LMWH在降低VTE复发方面有效[风险比(RR):0.67;95%置信区间(CI):0.47 - 0.95;p = 0.03]。然而,LMWH在主要出血事件(RR:1.05;95% CI:0.62 - 1.77;p = 0.85)、轻微出血事件(RR:0.80;95% CI:0.54 - 1.20;p = 0.28)和全因死亡率(RR:1.00;95% CI:0.88 - 1.13;p = 0.99)方面与华法林在统计学上效果相似。虽然与华法林相比,LMWH在降低癌症患者VTE复发发生率方面显示出有效性,但在死亡率或出血事件方面与华法林没有统计学差异。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议继续将LMWH用作减轻癌症患者VTE复发的一线治疗方案。