Shek Daniel T L, Chai Wenyu, Li Xiang, Dou Diya
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 18;14:1211229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1211229. eCollection 2023.
This study investigated the mental health problems of university students in Hong Kong and related sociodemographic and psychosocial predictors under the pandemic. A total of 978 undergraduate students (mean age = 20.69 ± 1.61) completed an online questionnaire measuring sociodemographic factors, psychological morbidity, positive well-being, COVID-19 related stress and self-efficacy, and positive psychosocial attributes. Psychosocial risk factors included psychological morbidity, COVID-19 related stress, and difficulties encountered under the pandemic, whereas protective factors comprised pandemic related self-efficacy, positive psychological attributes, positive environmental factors, need satisfaction and positive perception toward service. Results showed that psychological morbidity in the participants was widespread, and it was related to sociodemographic factors, particularly family financial difficulties. While pandemic related stress positively predicted psychological morbidity and negatively predicted well-being indicators, COVID-19 self-efficacy showed an opposite effect. Besides, positive psychological attributes (resilience, emotional competence, and positive beliefs related to adversity) and environmental factors (healthy family functioning, peer support, and supportive community atmosphere) negatively predicted psychological morbidity and positively predicted well-being. Furthermore, need satisfaction and positive perception toward service were negatively associated with psychological morbidity and positively associated with well-being, while perceived difficulties showed an opposite effect.
本研究调查了香港大学生在疫情下的心理健康问题以及相关的社会人口统计学和心理社会预测因素。共有978名本科生(平均年龄=20.69±1.61)完成了一份在线问卷,该问卷测量社会人口统计学因素、心理疾病、积极幸福感、与新冠疫情相关的压力和自我效能感,以及积极的心理社会属性。心理社会风险因素包括心理疾病、与新冠疫情相关的压力以及疫情下遇到的困难,而保护因素包括与疫情相关的自我效能感、积极的心理属性、积极的环境因素、需求满足感以及对服务的积极认知。结果表明,参与者中的心理疾病普遍存在,且与社会人口统计学因素有关,尤其是家庭经济困难。虽然与疫情相关的压力正向预测心理疾病,负向预测幸福感指标,但新冠疫情自我效能感则呈现相反的效果。此外,积极的心理属性(复原力、情绪能力以及与逆境相关的积极信念)和环境因素(健康的家庭功能、同伴支持以及支持性的社区氛围)负向预测心理疾病,正向预测幸福感。此外,需求满足感和对服务的积极认知与心理疾病呈负相关,与幸福感呈正相关,而感知到的困难则呈现相反的效果。