Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤躯干评定量表(TASS)和躯干控制测试在脊髓损伤患者中的有效性。

Validity of the trunk assessment scale for spinal cord injury (TASS) and the trunk control test in individuals with spinal cord injury.

机构信息

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation, Iwate Prefectural Central Hospital, Morioka, Japan.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Nov;47(6):944-951. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2228583. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

The Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the Trunk Control Test for individuals with a Spinal Cord Injury (TCT-SCI) are highly reliable assessment tools for evaluating the trunk function of individuals with SCIs. However, the potential differences in the validity of these two scales are unclear. To evaluate the criterion validity of the TASS and the construct validity of the TASS and TCT-SCI. We evaluated 30 individuals with SCIs (age 63.8 ± 10.7 yrs, 17 with tetraplegia). To evaluate criterion validity, we calculated Spearman's rho between the TASS and the gold standard (the TCT-SCI). To determine construct validity, we used the following hypothesis testing approaches: () calculating Spearman's rho between each scale and the upper and lower extremity motor scores (UEMS, LEMS), the Walking Index for SCI-II (WISCI-II), and the motor score of the Functional Independence Measure (mFIM); and () determining the cut-off point for identifying ambulators with SCIs (≥ 3 points on item 12 of Spinal Cord Independent Measure III) by a receiver operating characteristics analysis. A moderate correlation was confirmed between the TASS and the TCT-SCI ( = 0.68). Construct validity was supported by six of the eight prior hypotheses. The cut-off points for identifying ambulators with SCIs were 26 points (TASS) and 18 points (TCT-SCI). Our results indicate that the contents of the TASS and the TCT-SCI might reflect the epidemiological characteristics of the populations in which they were developed.

摘要

脊髓损伤躯干评估量表(TASS)和脊髓损伤个体躯干控制测试(TCT-SCI)是评估脊髓损伤个体躯干功能的高度可靠评估工具。然而,这两个量表的有效性的潜在差异尚不清楚。为了评估 TASS 的效标效度和 TASS 和 TCT-SCI 的结构效度。我们评估了 30 名脊髓损伤个体(年龄 63.8±10.7 岁,17 名四肢瘫痪)。为了评估效标效度,我们计算了 TASS 与金标准(TCT-SCI)之间的斯皮尔曼 rho。为了确定结构效度,我们使用了以下假设检验方法:()计算每个量表与上、下肢运动评分(UEMS、LEMS)、脊髓损伤步行指数 II(WISCI-II)和功能独立性测量的运动评分(mFIM)之间的斯皮尔曼 rho;和()通过受试者工作特征分析确定能够识别脊髓损伤步行者的分界点(脊髓损伤独立测量 III 第 12 项得分为≥3 分)。TASS 与 TCT-SCI 之间存在中度相关性( = 0.68)。八个假设中有六个得到了结构效度的支持。能够识别脊髓损伤步行者的分界点为 26 分(TASS)和 18 分(TCT-SCI)。我们的结果表明,TASS 和 TCT-SCI 的内容可能反映了它们所开发人群的流行病学特征。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland.芬兰外伤性脊髓损伤的流行病学。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Jul;59(7):761-768. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00575-4. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
9
User's guide to correlation coefficients.相关系数用户指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验