• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[化学感官障碍的检测——受影响者对健康状况的评估]

[Detection of disorders of the chemical senses-assessment of state of health by those affected].

作者信息

Schönherr Max-Vincent, Hummel Thomas

机构信息

Klinik- und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.

出版信息

HNO. 2023 Sep;71(9):566-571. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01345-3. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00106-023-01345-3
PMID:37535151
Abstract

Although hundreds of thousands of people seek medical help every year because of smell and taste disorders, the burden on patients is often underestimated by health care professionals. Numerous studies have demonstrated the impact of disorders of the chemical senses on quality of life. In clinical practice, the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) has proven to be a good measure of the impact of olfactory loss on everyday life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) should therefore be used more frequently for better recording and assessing the needs of patients. In addition to education and treatment by specialized clinics, the provision and optimization of information platforms, support groups, and organizations should be promoted in Germany.

摘要

尽管每年有数十万人因嗅觉和味觉障碍寻求医疗帮助,但医护人员往往低估了患者所承受的负担。大量研究已经证明了化学感官障碍对生活质量的影响。在临床实践中,嗅觉障碍问卷(QOD)已被证明是衡量嗅觉丧失对日常生活影响的一种有效方式。因此,应更频繁地使用患者报告结局指标(PROMs),以便更好地记录和评估患者的需求。除了由专业诊所进行教育和治疗外,德国还应推动信息平台、支持团体和组织的提供与优化。

相似文献

1
[Detection of disorders of the chemical senses-assessment of state of health by those affected].[化学感官障碍的检测——受影响者对健康状况的评估]
HNO. 2023 Sep;71(9):566-571. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01345-3. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Self-perceived Taste and Flavor Perception: Associations With Quality of Life in Patients With Olfactory Loss.自我感知的味觉和风味感知:与嗅觉丧失患者生活质量的关联。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jun;164(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1177/0194599820965242. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Olfactory-related Quality of Life Adjustments in Smell Loss during the Coronavirus-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间嗅觉丧失相关的生活质量调整。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Mar;36(2):253-260. doi: 10.1177/19458924211053118. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
4
Psychophysical testing of smell and taste function.嗅觉和味觉功能的心理物理学测试。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;164:229-246. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63855-7.00015-0.
5
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders.《嗅觉障碍问卷》韩文版的信度和效度。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Dec;8(12):1481-1485. doi: 10.1002/alr.22186. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
6
Predictive significance of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders-negative statements for olfactory loss in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.嗅觉障碍阴性陈述问卷对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者嗅觉丧失的预测意义。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov;279(11):5253-5262. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07438-z. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
7
Reliability and validity of a brief version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (brief QOD) in patients with olfactory dysfunction.嗅觉障碍问卷(brief QOD)简短版在嗅觉功能障碍患者中的可靠性和有效性。
Rhinology. 2022 Feb 1;60(1):56-62. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.059.
8
Olfaction and quality of life in patients with nasal septal deviation treated with septoplasty.鼻中隔偏曲矫正术后患者的嗅觉和生活质量。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Sep-Oct;40(5):747-754. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
9
Olfactory dysfunction and daily life.嗅觉功能障碍与日常生活。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Mar;262(3):231-5. doi: 10.1007/s00405-004-0796-y. Epub 2004 May 5.
10
Depression Symptoms and Olfactory-related Quality of Life.抑郁症状与嗅觉相关的生活质量。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Sep;132(9):1829-1834. doi: 10.1002/lary.30122. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
US experience with transparent medical records should reassure doctors.美国在透明医疗记录方面的经验应该能让医生们安心。
BMJ. 2022 Dec 9;379:o2969. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o2969.
2
Sorting of Odor Dilutions Is a Meaningful Addition to Assessments of Olfactory Function as Suggested by Machine-Learning-Based Analyses.正如基于机器学习的分析所表明的那样,对气味稀释度进行分类是嗅觉功能评估的一项有意义的补充。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 11;11(14):4012. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144012.
3
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:嗅觉。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Apr;12(4):327-680. doi: 10.1002/alr.22929.
4
Clinical assessment of olfactory function.嗅觉功能的临床评估。
Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab053.
5
Reliability and validity of a brief version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (brief QOD) in patients with olfactory dysfunction.嗅觉障碍问卷(brief QOD)简短版在嗅觉功能障碍患者中的可靠性和有效性。
Rhinology. 2022 Feb 1;60(1):56-62. doi: 10.4193/Rhin21.059.
6
Association between olfactory function and quality of life in patients with olfactory disorders: a multicenter study in over 760 participants.嗅觉障碍患者嗅觉功能与生活质量的关联:一项针对760多名参与者的多中心研究。
Rhinology. 2021 Apr 1;59(2):164-172. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.403.
7
A brief version of the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者嗅觉障碍问卷的简表。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Oct;9(10):1144-1150. doi: 10.1002/alr.22392. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Updated Sniffin' Sticks normative data based on an extended sample of 9139 subjects.基于9139名受试者的扩展样本更新的嗅觉棒常模数据。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5248-1. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
9
Olfactory implant: Demand for a future treatment option in patients with olfactory dysfunction.嗅觉植入物:嗅觉功能障碍患者对未来治疗选择的需求。
Laryngoscope. 2019 Feb;129(2):312-316. doi: 10.1002/lary.27476. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
10
Methods for shortening patient-reported outcome measures.缩短患者报告结局测量工具的方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):2992-3011. doi: 10.1177/0962280218795187. Epub 2018 Aug 20.