Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2023 Aug;54(8):462-469. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20230707-01. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) is altered in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and correlates inversely with visual acuity. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is an imaging tool to visualize FAZ safely and easily. Automated measurements can facilitate interpretation of OCTA images. In this comparative cross-sectional study, we compare the results of manual measurement of the FAZ with automated measurement by built-in application (Metrix).
The study included patients with RVO who underwent OCTA. Manual measurement was compared with automated evaluation by Metrix in 3 mm x 3 mm and 6 mm x 6 mm scan sizes and correlations of the circularity, circumference, and size of the FAZ were calculated.
Forty-seven eyes were included in the study. A reliable measurement result in both Metrix 3 mm x 3 mm and 6 mm x 6 mm was found in only 25 of 47 eyes. The mean FAZ in these eyes by manual measurement was 0.50 mm compared with 0.20 mm and 0.24 mm, respectively, by automated measurement. A statistically significant inverse correlation was found in both the automated 3 mm x 3 mm and 6 mm x 6 mm measurements for FAZ circumference with FAZ circularity but not FAZ area.
The two automated measurements showed no significant bias regarding the size of the FAZ, but the plausibility of the data should be checked on a case-by-case basis. The manual measurements were higher, indicating limited agreement of manual and automated measurements. The information on circularity can point to ischemic maculopathy early in the course of the disease. .
视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者的中心凹无血管区(FAZ)发生改变,与视力呈负相关。光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)是一种安全、简便地显示 FAZ 的成像工具。自动测量有助于 OCTA 图像的解读。在这项横断面对比研究中,我们比较了手动测量 FAZ 与内置应用程序(Metrix)自动测量的结果。
该研究纳入了接受 OCTA 检查的 RVO 患者。手动测量与 Metrix 的自动评估在 3mm×3mm 和 6mm×6mm 两种扫描大小下进行比较,并计算 FAZ 圆度、周长和大小的相关性。
共有 47 只眼纳入研究。仅在 47 只眼中的 25 只眼中发现了 Metrix 3mm×3mm 和 6mm×6mm 两种方法都能获得可靠的测量结果。这些眼中 FAZ 的平均直径通过手动测量为 0.50mm,而通过自动测量分别为 0.20mm 和 0.24mm。在 FAZ 周长与 FAZ 圆度的自动 3mm×3mm 和 6mm×6mm 测量中均发现了统计学上显著的负相关,但与 FAZ 面积无关。
两种自动测量方法在 FAZ 大小方面均无显著偏差,但应逐例检查数据的合理性。手动测量值较高,表明手动和自动测量之间的一致性有限。圆度信息可早期提示疾病过程中是否存在缺血性黄斑病变。